• magic_lobster_party@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    Leave Heather alone. There’s nothing wrong with this desktop background. Please refrain from remote connecting to her computer in the future.

    • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      It sounds far more likely to me that she right-clicked on some image file and picked “Set as desktop background”.

      • lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Which almost makes it worst. I mean I get the last part. Why ever she right clicked, she took the wrong option, fine. But how did she even end up on an image like that at work? What did she research?

    • glitch1985@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      You know they have one of those calculators on their desk with the spool of paper so they can check the math.

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Real talk it was probably Heather works under her and asked “hey what do I do when a large picture of mustard appears on my screen” and Director Of Finance said "reboot and if it’s still their I’ll let so-and-so know from IT, then emailed it off to so-and-so from IT directly instead of entering a ticket

      • turtlesareneat@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        My headcannon is more like, Director stops by and wants to know why Heather is looking at mustard bottles again, she has been warned about this, you see. She suddenly jumps and says “Oh, it uh, I was just working and then this happened.” Well that’s not fair is it? It’s not like she was intentionally looking at mustard again

        And that’s the thing about IT, we save people’s jobs. Even freaks. Blame us, Heather, our shoulders are broad.

        • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          True. I tell my clients when they do something dumb to blame IT. We can take the heat. It’s part of the job.

          • OldChicoAle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            It’s like being a day care center employee. You’re always responsible even when little Johnny puts a fork in the electrical socket.

  • M.int@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Since this seems like a preventable issue for me, I wanted to disable the Set As Desktop Background… option in Firefox.
    That was not as straightforward as I thought it would be:

    • Settings: nope
    • about:config: nope
    • userChrome.css: The Internet, and LLMs tell you yes, but actually nope

    What you have to do is create a policies.json file and put that somewhere…
    Here is the deeply buried site from Mozilla about that. There you will find where to put it and all the options.

    For this problem a short policies.json with the following content is enough:

    {
      "policies": {
        "DisableSetDesktopBackground": true
      }
    }
    

    Why did I do this in the middle of the night instead of browsing ich_iel or I dunno sleeping. Who knows…

    • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Instead of locking down the the ability to set the wallpaper via Firefox, just set a static image as the wallpaper via GPO. A company logo or something. Then it will apply at every restart.

    • AndyTheAbsurd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      In a corporate environment where you care about such things, you really want to disable the functionality of the user setting the background in the operating system, not in a specific application. Otherwise, you’re going to have to track down every application that includes this functionality, figure out how to disable it it in that application, and find a way to apply that change to every PC. (Microsoft’s Photos app, for example, can set pictures as either background or lock screen.)

  • Klear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Crop to selection in Paint.net: ctrl + shift + x
    Set as wallpaper in IrfanView: ctrl + shift + x

    Happens to me all the fucking time.

    • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      We used to shout in the company chat about how much “i” love the company.
      Very bad spanish sentences were fun too.

    • almost1337@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      My favorite was to screenshot the desktop, set that as the background, then move everything on it to a different folder.

      • Klear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        You can just disable desktop icons in windows. It’s both less destructive and more infuriating.

      • Honytawk@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Flip the image upside down and then flip the screen upside down as well so it looks normal. Except for the cursor, which will be upside down and moving in the wrong direction.

        • ryedaft@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          In the good old days we would just do that prank by taking the ball out of the mouse and putting in again backwards.

  • ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    And this is why we have a GPO that locks the background to a corporate image.

    • x00z@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I think it’s nice if people can set their own background picture. They can put a picture of their pets or family members which lowers the stress.

      A better policy would be to hire people who can actually do basic things with the thing they’ll be working 8 hours a day with.

      • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        One place I worked they happened to roll out a desktop background group policy while I was there and I learned that one person would open the image they wanted as their background in an image viewer cirst first and leave it open while they opened everything else for the day so they could pretend their preferred background was still their background.

        Honestly I’m of two minds on setting a background as a group policy, because on one hand having a set corporate-friendly background is good for maintaining a professional look, I’ve really yet to see any inappropriate backgrounds amongst the too many places and people I’ve supported that dont lock down backgrounds. Like at worst its sometimes awkward pictures of someone’s loved ones that are just really bad photos, but usually if they have set something it’s something that means something to them so it’s a nice little touch of personalization that might be the thing that helps them make it through the day

        • x00z@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          having a set corporate-friendly background is good for maintaining a professional look

          That kind of depends. When meeting with customers it might be preferred. But in most companies most of the computer screens are only seen by a handful of people who already work at the company.

          I’ve really yet to see any inappropriate backgrounds

          Inappropriate backgrounds would fall under the general inappropriate rules. Like watching porn at work. I’ve never seen that.

          it’s something that means something to them

          It might even be a nice icebreaker at times. Like a vacation picture could spark a nice little talk about the destination.

          • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yeah I think if I were in a decision making position and that was a decision to make, I’d include a standard corporate desktop image in my standard computer config but only enforce it by policy on customer-facing PCs