Biden’s office announced his illness Sunday afternoon.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          139
          ·
          2 months ago

          I stomached looking at his truth social account so you don’t have to:

          Melania and I are saddened to hear about Joe Biden’s recent medical diagnosis. We extend our warmest and best wishes to Jill and the family, and we wish Joe a fast and successful recovery.

          I guess some pr person has his phone today. He’ll probably say something stupid in an interview later.

            • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              2 months ago

              Yeah the comments ITT are pretty awful. I’m no fan of Biden, but some of the comments here are depraved.

              • Krono@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                15
                arrow-down
                12
                ·
                2 months ago

                Aiding and abetting a genocide is depraved.

                Going on national TV and lying about seeing “pictures of 40 beheaded babies” is depraved.

                Celebrating when a war criminal gets prostate cancer? Not depraved at all in my opinion. He deserves much worse.

                • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Aiding and abetting a genocide is depraved.

                  Agreed.

                  Going on national TV and lying about seeing “pictures of 40 beheaded babies” is depraved.

                  Agreed.

                  He deserves much worse.

                  Agreed.

                  Celebrating when a war criminal gets prostate cancer? Not depraved at all in my opinion.

                  Hard disagree.

                  You can acknowledge that he’s an awful person while refraining from celebrating his misfortune.

                  If someone deserves punishment, celebrating that punishment is basically just hatred. I might want to get that looked at.

            • catloaf@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Yeah. Turns out he posted on twitter last night, less than three hours from the OP’s countdown:

              What I want to know is how did Dr. Jill Biden miss stage five metastatic cancer or is this yet another coverup???

              I should note that there is no such thing as stage five cancer, only 1-4. And Jill Biden’s doctorate is in education.

          • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            64
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            I checked the Conservative subreddit to see what their reaction was and it’s pretty sympathetic. This made me laugh though

              • catloaf@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                25
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Cancer doesn’t care about ideology, but it sure seems like one ideology in the US cares about giving you cancer and denying treatment for it.

                If cancer could vote, it would vote Republican.

                • LanguageIsCool@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Yes. That’s a big reason why a democrat posting in r/conservative calling them classy and wonderful almost made me puke.

            • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              29
              ·
              2 months ago

              As if this isn’t the most basic norm of the presidency?

              Has any other president trashed an ex presidents diagnosis (or something similar)?

  • the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Why can’t the current president get aggressive cancer? Everyone would love that (although I would pity the cancer).

  • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    2 months ago

    Maybe I’m cynical but I feel like this is suspicious timing to release this information a day after videos of his memory issues in 2023 surfaced. Feels like a cynical attempt by his PR team to change the narrative.

    In all honesty, an 82 year old man having prostate cancer is not very surprising. It is a personal issue and I have sympathy but it’s frankly not important to the world. A US president with memory issues concealed from voters and his own party in 2023 when it could have seriously changed decisions about the Democratic party nominations is surprising. That is an issue for everyone and very important to the world.

    • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Biden’s PR team trying to change the topic about his health and his track record? Unheard of!

      But yeah it’s not a shock an old man has a form of cancer that affects men more as they age.

      Shame Trump hasn’t had something similar.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s not just Biden s team. Its the entire media consent apparatus build around the DNC that was responsible for Biden being around as long as he was.

        They’re all culpable.

        • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          And then people were mad about “why are they talking about Biden when Trump is unhealthy?!”

          Maybe we don’t want either unhealthy presidents, and only one side would listen to public outcry, and the other wouldn’t listen.

          God damn, America is just fucked. Actual criticism was called unfair, and actual evidence of documented crimes of domestic and abroad was considered things paid for by $BAD_NATION.

          I am a bit salty that one of my favorite people on .world was banned from this community due to a mod getting mad at them refusing to support genocide and proving they voted for Harris.

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    2 months ago

    I wish him ease of his suffering in direct proportion to how much he eased innocent Palestinians suffering. Seems only fair.

  • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    With all the best doctors the presidents have, they discover it only at the fourth stage?

    I’m a lowly peasant and my work let me do a yearly blood+pee test, I assumed that for presidents it would be something like a weekly checkup

    • blakenong@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      122
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s likely that they knew a long time ago but they are just now announcing it. This would probably also explain why he was so mentally foggy or, seeming like he had dementia. Many cancer drug drugs can do that toyou.

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        85
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        If that’s the case he was even more wrong about running than everyone assumed.

          • Honytawk@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Compared to Trump winning? Which was the only viable other option during that term.

            • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 months ago

              Viable!?! Given Biden only really won because of Covid, I think Bernie would’ve actually had a shot in the general, especially in energizing the base and working class. Warren could’ve also stood a better chance, even if she might not have done as great of a job in office.

              Biden was the worst choice, I thought Buttigieg, Klobuchar, and especially Harris in 2020 were far better, but the capitalist elites wanted a weak old man, so we got Biden, dooming us for 2024 because there was no way he’d be selfless enough to step aside. He might’ve said he’d be one term, but he was lying and that’s why no one took him seriously.

          • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I mean, Biden is quoted as calling it a campaign promise.

            Which is is less binding than a pinky promise, but in 2024, he at least saw that he had made the commitment in 2020. Plenty of people in 2024 then were also incorrectly saying that Biden didn’t make that promise.

      • Gismonda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        This was exactly my first thought.

        And if so, that’s a double “fuck you” to Joe and everyone on his staff trying to keep this shit under wraps.

        He should have just resigned the goddamn Presidency when he was first diagnosed JFC

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      cancers can grow very quickly in the short amount of time, only takes weeks for a tumor to grow large suddenly if its an aggressive type. also many cancers, like melanoma can spread with a small tumor extremely fast. the staging depends on how much its spread, and also by the biopsy how much it infilitrated the layers of tissues.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    2 months ago

    I always love the cognitive dissonance people have seeing others hope that a man directly responsible for a metric ton of civilian deaths, succumbing to a painful death, is not ethically correct.

    I mean people seem to have zero issue with United Healthcare. Exorbitant Healthcare costs is the equivalent of death, but literally bombing hospitals and refugee camps isn’t?

    Not to mention that he’ll be receiving the latest and greatest in medical aid anyway, so there’s a fair chance he’ll survive. A lot of geriatric asshat world leaders contracted covid and still lived.

    I can’t even tell if this is DNC shilling because several people have implied they would treat Trump the same. Wth kind of moral compass are yall following lol?

    • Custard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I heard recently it’s incredibly common for men to get diagnosed with prostate cancer and then just die normally from something else. Likely the same happens with him

    • errer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      2 months ago

      While this represents a more aggressive form of the disease, the cancer appears to be hormone-sensitive which allows for effective management.

      Feels like more of the same strategy of downplaying Biden’s symptoms. I bet when he dies they’ll deny it for a few days.

      • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        51
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I don’t disagree that there is a strategy of downplaying not just Biden’s, but every politician’s health conditions.

        I used to have this absolutely incredible writing professor, who, at 85, told us on the first day of class that he was dying, and had been for 4 years. He even had a blog about his reflections on mortality that he invited us to read. He had prostate cancer. I don’t remember the details, but they couldn’t operate to remove it or do chemo, but it was the kind that is hormone sensitive. They gave him a drug that destroyed his body’s ability to produce testosterone, so the cancer just stopped growing. He died at 90 - 9 years after his diagnosis. 10% extra life for him.

        No two people and prognosis’ are alike but the possibility exists they might be telling the truth about managing it.

        • TwanHE@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Some people just defy the odds sometimes, my grandpa was supposed to die 5 or 6 times before he finally did. Multiple times the doctors told us they could no longer do anything for him, only for him to recover and get into the same situation with another issue some years later.

          He lived on borrowed time ever since my mom was born yet lived to see his first grand-grandchild born some 30+ years later.

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      the form is still hormone sensitive so its treatable, to an extent, obvious with metasis is lower, but prostate usually have good prognosis, but that depends other factors.

      much like breast cancers that are hormone sensitive, they are treatable, the ones that triple negative or the rare IBC those are very aggressive and they are not affected by anti-hormone therapy.