• gleb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    in my honest opinion, it’s a real shame that webp isn’t widely supported. it’s actually really great: it has awesome lossless compression, it’s so much smaller than a png while not losing any quality, it supports animation and loops, etc. it’s like jpg, png, and gif rolled into one format.

  • skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 months ago

    The giant jpeg square artefact on the side of Homer’s head in the first frame undermines the message somewhat.

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m not sure that’s a JPEG artifact. It looks more like a video compression artifact (since the image is probably taken from a video).

        • Scrollone@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          lol there’s a specific AVI format based on JPEG, but other file formats use different algorithms

          • Aux@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Pretty much all compression algorithms work similar to JPEG. The newer formats only add even more crazy maths to the mix, but the base is pretty much the same.

  • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    The real difference is between gif and animated webp… Even fewer places accept animated webp than normal webp and those that do often don’t even show it right (looking at you slack emojis) which is a travesty as the file size difference is huge

      • saltesc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Wait till you find out what’s inside when you change Office files from .***x to .zip

    • randomname@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Why does this even work though? WEBP and PNG are very different file formats yet for some reason this has always worked for me as well. Is windows automatically converting the files? I haven’t checked if changing the file extension changes the file size.

      • odelik@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        WebP is an extended container around the RIFF file format, and contains the RIFF header info. So any container that is built off RIFF, or supports RIFF, can at least interpret the container data that is RIFF compatible and will lose anything that has been extended upon.

  • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    4 months ago

    for my use cases of memes or a PowerPoint type thing once in a while for school. Literally any image format works for me. I don’t care about quality (as long as it’s not REALLY bad) and just want to get the image from Google to the PowerPoint, and somehow GOOGLES own image format fails to work for GOOGLES PowerPoint product.
    I don’t understand how you can not support your own format 10 years after it came out.

    pro tip by the way, you can open it in Microsoft paint then “save as -> .PNG” to get Google slides/whatever to accept it.

    (before someone recommends alternatives, im talking about use on a locked down school computer. I can’t use alternative software that’s better because they block images in WIKIPEDIA, no shot for using an actual foss software lmao)

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Plus, it makes a bunch of users resort to adding extensions to their browser such as

      “Save webP as PNG or JPEG 1.5.4”

      which is fine but absolutely not as secure as without extensions.

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      use on a locked down school computer.

      Shift + Win + S

      I’ll bet they didn’t disable that in Group Policy. Lasso that sumbitch right off your screen and then just paste it into whatever.

      • Liz@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        Paint trick would leave the option for higher quality, a screen grab leaves you at screen grab resolution.

        • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          True, but I’ll wager most of the things people are filching for these purposes get displayed on the screen at 100% scale anyway. Unless you’re sniping a picture for large format print, in which case I figure you’d probably be under less restrictive conditions… Hopefully.

    • Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      You don’t even have to open it in Microsoft paint, you can just save it as a new format from the standard image viewer software.

  • SatyrSack@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    What is being implied here? That Website A encourages you to download an image from them in WEBP format, but you cannot then upload that image to Websites B through Z because those sites do not support WEBP?

  • manxu@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    The funniest thing is that even some of Google’s own products don’t accept Webp, like Google Voice.

    • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Shhhh just be happy Google Voice still exists, and isn’t in the graveyard. Personally I’d take RCS over webp in Google Voice.

      • manxu@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        I feel with you. The product idea is awesome, the implementation is so-so, and progress is backwards. It’s heart-breaking, really, and so sad nobody has a real alternative.