• barsoap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    7 months ago

    There’s a much better reason to not be violent: So that you can get more people onto the streets. Figures that most people don’t fancy dodging burning trash cans and you want everybody on the streets, not just your polycule. People need to feel like they’re safe at the protest, the only danger there is is coming from the state.

    • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 months ago

      I know, right? These fuvking anachronistic world war mashup re-enacters, fucking tear gassing and shooting random people as they get so mean towards the cops!

    • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      That’s a nice argument when the cops are not yet shooting random passerbys with rubber bullets and teargas. People don’t stay home because they’re afraid of other protestors.

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        There’s a massive fucking vibe difference between a crowd taking cover behind whatever is at hand and one setting fire to shit and throwing back stones is all I’m saying. Be the former vibe. Stones aren’t going to stop them. Assault rifles and tanks wouldn’t stop them. Pining for escalation hands them excuses on a platter for no strategic gain whatsoever, it’s pissing in the wind. The only law you should be breaking is refusing to follow a dispersal order, or at least take your sweet time with it, everything else is fedposting.

        • anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          The only law you should be breaking is refusing to follow a dispersal order

          And that’s the one they point to as an excuse to start shooting, you shitlib.

          They don’t need an excuse. They will escalate it long before anyone in the street does. It’s also wild to me that ‘throwing stones’ is somehow seen as more violent than literal fucking munitions and chemical weapons. “Just stand there and let them shoot at you” is quite a take from someone who has clearly never been shot at by fascists in riot gear.

          If this were an ordinary liberal riot guard we might be able to count on deescalation, but as libs have so been eager to point out when votemaxxing online, this isn’t an ordinary liberal riot guard. Either bend over and spread for the next phase of american fascist policing or shut the fuck up about how people are choosing to resist it. Communities are fighting against unaccountable and un-identifiable gestapo pigs blackbagging innocent children - don’t concern troll us about deescalation.

          • barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            They don’t need an excuse.

            To shoot? No. To justify themselves in the media, in the public eye? Yes.

            It’s also wild to me that ‘throwing stones’ is somehow seen as more violent than literal fucking munitions and chemical weapons.

            It’s not. That’s as much a shitlib take as “police violence isn’t violence because it’s state violence”.

            But it’s the perception that exists among the population, you’re not going to change it by throwing stones.

            Communities are fighting against unaccountable and un-identifiable gestapo pigs blackbagging innocent children

            You know what people did to protect Jews from the Gestapo? Hide them. You can’t protect them by throwing stones for the simple reason that police dgaf when they’re hit by stones, they’ll just blackbag you alongside.


            Look there’s exactly one thing I’m saying here: Act strategically. I’m not arguing against violence because it’s evil – at most, violence is unaesthetic. I’m arguing against it because, unless you start an actual insurrection with plans to take on and take out the military, it’s ineffective. Just because your pigs are worse than what we’re dealing with over here doesn’t mean that lashing out at them suddenly becomes good praxis. You’re there to have an effect, not to blow off steam.

            • anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              7 months ago

              To justify themselves in the media, in the public eye? Yes.

              No they don’t. Just look at how often they use footage from completely unrelated events in their coverage. Anyone with even a slight predilection against protestors or a law enforcement bias will accept any willful misrepresentation as ‘aesthetic’ and condemn the whole group regardless.

              But it’s the perception that exists among the population, you’re not going to change it by throwing stones.

              Nothing the protestors actually do will move the needle - it’s the extreme overreaction of the fed that will.

              You know what people did to protect Jews from the Gestapo? Hide them.

              Only after the Nazis had actually banned extra-party protests and clamped down on all opposition, and only after they had already carted away several million jews and political opponents off to concentration camps. You want to wait that long do something? Be my guest.

              I’m arguing against it because, unless you start an actual insurrection with plans to take on and take out the military, it’s ineffective.

              The goal of most rebellions isn’t to take control of the reigns of power - the goal is to make it so costly to suppress that the state is forced to cut their loss, or else risk the resistance spreading. There is no version of resisting a fascist movement in the US that involves armed militias overpowering federal forces. Liberals are desperate to maintain the illusion of democracy by simply resisting at the fringes - if they don’t piss Trump off too much, then maybe there will still be enough democracy left for them to vote him away without any real conflict! What a wonderful fantasy that is.

              Liberals need to pick a lane - either trump is a dictator who must be removed before he solidifies his hold on power, or we need to conduct ourselves until the midterms so that we can vote our way out. It can’t be both.

              • barsoap@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                7 months ago

                You want to wait that long do something? Be my guest.

                Who said anything about waiting? Stop posting and organise that shit. Don’t look at me I’m on the other side of the Atlantic.

                Nothing the protestors actually do will move the needle - it’s the extreme overreaction of the fed that will.

                Please look up opinion polling after the Kent State Massacre: It took years for public opinion to shift away from “the National Guard did nothing wrong”. For what you say to occur the overreaction has to not just be extreme, it also has to be obvious – like the Aussie journalist which got shot, that’s a good video. Things don’t become more obviously an overreaction when cars are burning and shopfronts are deglassed.

                Liberals need to pick a lane - either trump is a dictator who must be removed before he solidifies his hold on power, or we need to conduct ourselves until the midterms so that we can vote our way out.

                I wouldn’t argue for either. Both are unrealistic for various reasons and the latter isn’t a good in itself. What you want to do is obstruct the fuck out the feds so they fall on their face, that’s best done on a level of state and lower administrations. California isn’t cooperating with ICE so make sure to have the state’s back. Yes, I, an anarchist is saying “have the state’s back”, fascism is too large a threat to risk over feelings of disgust regarding liberal democracy. Last thing you want is the Governor seeing himself in a situation where he has to ask the feds to intervene to keep (a semblance of) order instead of being able to say “fuck off feds we got this”.

                • anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Stop posting and organise that shit.

                  Most of us do both.

                  For what you say to occur the overreaction has to not just be extreme, it also has to be obvious – like the Aussie journalist which got shot, that’s a good video.

                  Yup, and with any luck Trump will continue with the lack of subtlety.

                  Things don’t become more obviously an overreaction when cars are burning and shopfronts are deglassed.

                  Those things happen every day in the US. Hell, some sports fans will flip cars after a moderately good football game. Corporatized media will find footage of those things regardless of what the actual protestors are doing, and implicate them with it. Even when counterprotestors are actually assaulting peaceful protestors, Fox news and their many subsidiary channels will find the one shot with an angry exchange that paints the picture and use it to implicate the entire movement. And when they do, liberals will be right there to wag their fingers.

                  The good news is that Trump is such a dipshit that he’ll send in fucking tanks for just about any goddamned reason, and those are really fucking hard to hide and even harder to justify with a few broken windows and lots of unarmed protestors.

                  What you want to do is obstruct the fuck out the feds so they fall on their face, that’s best done on a level of state and lower administrations

                  Yea, this is what i’m referring to by saying ‘middling around the fringes’. There is no amount of legalese that will slow down an actual authoritarian. You can’t run around screaming that he’s going to fucking end democracy and then strategize on how to bury him in legal threats. Either he’s a dictator or he can be obstructed by judicial paperwork. You can’t have a dictator that politely complies with the judiciary, that’s what makes them a dictator.

                  This is how liberals end up collaborating with fascists: they are so uncomfortable with extralegal resistance that they delude themselves into a belief that working within the structures that are actively being dismantled is the ‘only realistic way’ to resist against it. What happens when we get to the ‘outlawing of rival political parties’ part of fascism? We’ve already crossed over the ‘no due process for criminals’ line, how many more core democratic foundations do we have to lose before it’s game over?

                  Not everyone can or should be in black bloc sabotaging ICE vehicles, but pretending as if the usual checks and balances are still functioning is willful ignorance.

                  • barsoap@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    Yup, and with any luck Trump will continue with the lack of subtlety.

                    You’re being accelerationalist. Also that wasn’t Trump that was a local jackboot jacking off.

                    Either he’s a dictator or he can be obstructed by judicial paperwork. You can’t have a dictator that politely complies with the judiciary, that’s what makes them a dictator.

                    Who the fuck cares if the dictator complies, what matters is that the overall system complies. There’s still quite some inertia left in the gears of the rule of law, people around Trump (not him, he doesn’t care nor does he understand) know how to attack that but chances are they’re severely underestimating the task. Unlike back in the Weimar Republic, you e.g. don’t have a country full of judges considering law passed by parliament to not even be law because law must be passed by the Kaiser.

                    Noticed how the Border Tsar backed off when Newson (what’s he spelled I don’t care) told him “go, come arrest me”? That’s not the behaviour of a viceroy of a dictator, that’s the behaviour of one who would like to have that power, but doesn’t.

                    One of the first things btw that the Nazis did was to (functionally) dissolve the states and put them under direct federal control. That’s another reason why you want to shout “state’s rights” right now.

                    Not everyone can or should be in black bloc sabotaging ICE vehicles

                    The fuck are you doing that as a black bloc. Those are a lightning rod for police violence so that others can protest in peace, you don’t want the sabotage squad to be a lightning rod, you want them to be ninjas. Unseen, unheard, unnoticed. More of a warning west and not black hoodie kind of task.

                    And, see, suddenly we’re talking black blocs. An actual tactic. One that acknowledges the importance of peaceful protest, at the very least the necessity to separate yourself from the overall crowd, so that liberals can go to baby’s first protest because we want them in the street, actually seeing shit, feeling vibes, and not in front of the TV, watching propaganda. Not, as in the OP, “fuck this shit I want to smash things”, at least that’s the vibes that I got: Justification for a foregone conclusion, not a plan grown out of analysis of the overall situation.

      • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I actually did. I’ve got an ex girlfriend i really don’t want to run into.

        Edit: look, if i remind her i exist she might mention how bad i am in bed, and then id make it into some history books. No thank you.

        • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          I hope you’re not sincerely avoiding protests because of an ex. I can’t laugh about exes and bad sex when I live in fear every day that ICE might snatch my partner off the street.

          It’s not a bad joke on its own, it’s just in poor taste considering the state of things. The fear of Trump’s dictatorship far outweighs the fear of running into even my most abusive ex.

          • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            7 months ago

            in poor taste

            So, whether or not this is a bit¹: the potential harm from edgy jokes is the same as the harm from dystopian fiction warning us about bad things that could happen. The potential for harm is that dipshits with zero self awareness and less media literacy will just blindly copy the thing. Like how siliconbvalley billionaires have tried to do almost literally every part of ‘snow crash’.

            If my character in the bit is shitty and not someone you would want to be at any point, or I’m on a server defederated from beehaw and world; this danger is mitigated.

            And for those who have actually been through shit, your criticism here comes off as privileged, colonizing, and completely misunderstanding what humor is, because you’ve never had a use for it. It comes off as ‘if i laugh at myself i am lesser, because the only way i know how to laugh is by sorting groups and affirming my group’s position at the top’. And thats a really bad fucking look. Im not saying shut up; im saying read up on the topic.

            ¹just for you; I’m never gonna tell now.

            • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              That’s what you take away here? That I’m some privileged, humorless bigot that’s never “been through shit”?

              You gathered that from one comment. I guess all the 900-ish comments I’ve made here on Lemmy, many of which discuss my experiences with “shit” like disabilities, homelessness, and sexism just don’t factor in. I make no secret of my struggles, past and present, and I genuinely fear my partner getting kidnapped and tortured in El Salvador. I was born with some kinds of targets already on my back, but under this administration, my partner’s targets shine brighter than mine.

              Of course, I didn’t expect you to know any of that, in the same way I wouldn’t expect you to know much of anything about a stranger after one interaction with them.

              But it doesn’t matter, as I can see I’m onboard the Lemmy Downvote train. So choo-choo, motherfuckers.

    • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      7 months ago

      People usually only remember part of Thomas Jefferson’s quote: “The tree of liberty must be refreshed with the blood of tyrants.”

      The full thing goes “The tree of liberty must be refreshed with the blood of patriots and tyrants.”

      This is class warfare. We all need to start getting used to the fact that many of us patriots are going to die fighting this fascist machine.