• COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    6 days ago

    If they really wanted to change regulations they’d push changing zoning regulations in cities to allow building anything other than detached single family housing. That would be totally reasonable and help alongside tax incentives. But I have a feeling that’s not what’s meant by changing regulations…

    • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      6 days ago

      They said “making federal land available”. I take that as they want to sell off land in places like national parks to be developed.

      Which, needless to say, is an awful idea.

    • somethingp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      I thinks that’s one of those state’s rights things where federal government can’t just tell a town how to zone it’s own land unless they’re taking it away from the town like for a national Park or something.

      • terry_jerry@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        It’s actually an instance of super small government. Those regulations are dictated by city’s and counties not by states

    • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      The american dream isnt raising a family in an apartment, and a lot of people were raised on that dream.

      We need to change the perception of condensed housing I think before there is support for that.

      • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Before you can start to change public perception it needs to be legal to build densely. Parking minimums and a variety of other commercial building code regulations make this much more expensive in the US, all while the people nearby in single family homes fight any new builds due to their poor perception of condos and apartments. Just removing the stigma is only one part of the equation.

      • capital@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        My perception of dense housing is smelling cigarettes and weed and hearing fighting, dogs barking, loud exhaust, and loud bass for hours on end.

        I think we change the perception by enforcing rules to keep people from disturbing others peace at home. Make it a reality that dense housing isn’t a worse experience. That isn’t currently the case.

        I’d be much more apt to go back to dense housing if I was confident that my complaints would be heard and actioned up to and including evicting the offenders (after many complaints and no corrective actions taken). But I have never heard of such a place.

        • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          Ive heard that might be a materials issue. The apartment I stayed in had great sound proofing. I think its just lazy cheap builders, or whoever commissions their buildings.

          • capital@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            I have no issues with my neighbors to either side of me. Either they’re quiet or the walls separating us are decent enough to block it.

            My issue seems to mostly come via the windows. Even closed, I can hear far too much.

            I should clarify my original comment - I’m currently living in a townhouse (first time) and we’re already trying to sell to get the hell out of here and back into what we’re used to, a single-family home. I now understand why people hate them so much. I should have known from my time living in an apartment when I was younger.