• Sunflier@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    It’s not that we shouldn’t have billionaires. Its that we have billionaires when we have people living on the streets because the rent is so ridiculous. Its that we have people dying on the streets because they cannot afford health insurance. The gravy on the shit-fest is that billionaires are actively bribing the politicians to prevent those policies from being implemented. That is the textbook recipe for guillotines.

  • Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I think we should have billionaires.

    Because they wouldn’t miss a 90% tax on their highest bracket, and they aren’t going away, so why not turn them into the resource they should have stayed.

    I mean there’s lots of other problems that have gotten far worse in the past decades to make the wealth inequality ridiculous, but a good starting point is MAGA. Bring back the high taxes on those who can afford it, to fund helping those in need.

  • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    5 months ago

    This needs to become the mainstream opinion. Billionaires and ultra wealthy shouldn’t exist. There is no trickling down or any of that stolen wealth coming back into the hands of average people.

  • UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 months ago

    If a Billionaire turned comic book EVIL and decided to go rogue… What exactly would stop him. Most countries don’t have the money or desire to do anything

  • venusaur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I hope nobody tries to assassinate him. Seems like there’s A LOT of money involved in this race.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Nobody should have a right to more than, say, 10 million dollars. Any worth over that, tax it at 100%.

    Similarly for companies, tax them dynamically. Ybr bigger the company, the higher the tax. At, say, over a billion dollars, tax it 100%. Limit company sizes to 1000 employees.

    This way, nobody is too big, nobody is too powerful, nobody is too rich

      • STUNT_GRANNY@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Make the tax scale into an exponential multiplier. Two companies? Double taxed. Three companies? Your taxes are now cubed. So on and so forth.

        Maybe subsidiaries of larger conglomerates should be taxed this way as well, take giants like Nestle and Unilever down a few pegs.

    • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      10 million seems low only because there are realistic things that can cost more than that. Nothing an individual could buy costs a billion. That’s the heinous part of billionaires in my opinion—it is just numbers on a screen for them to measure their dicks with. No realistic change of lifestyle is happening after the first billion, yet they continue to inhale dollars out of greed and habit.

    • itsprobablyfine@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t like the idea of limiting company size - there are a lot of advantages of scale. Instead let’s say any company over 1000 employees must be fully employee owned

        • itsprobablyfine@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Crazy inefficiencies is why not. If you’ve ever worked a large infrastructure or construction project you’d see why this doesn’t work. There are advantages of scale. A single company being able to handle the land acquisition, and all engineering alone for a large project is going to be like 10000 people, and that’s without construction. If I had to work with 15 other companies to get a thing built I’ll tell you right now that things never gonna get built. Big companies aren’t the problem, small ownership is the problem. Employee owned (socialist) companies are the solution. It’s not about not scaling, it’s about ensuring that the workers own the means of production. If you want renewable energy, high speed rail, and sustainable district engineering we need to leverage economies of scale. It’s just that we need to set up economic systems that distribute the profits to those doing the work.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Uh huh. Fidsized factory is fine. Also, different employees from different companies. Cleaning? Other company. Transport? Different company

  • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    There should be a tax that ramps up more and more the closer you are to be worth 1 billion dollars. If you are worth 999.999 million 100% of your income is taxed so you never reach 1 billion. And guess what? Your quality of life will not be affected in any way whatsoever.

  • P1nkman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 months ago

    I worry the billionaires will send assassins after him. It would cost them so much less than what he’s suggesting.