Welp…

  • mazzilius_marsti@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    5 months ago

    A white South African dude created the American Party

    ffs did somebody step on a bug in 2015 and change the whole timeline?

  • rational_lib@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’ll just point out the risk of what I’ll call “Joe Roganing” here. Elon pretends he hates both parties while there’s no election coming up. Then when the election arrives he “makes up his mind” and endorses Republicans. This allows him to 1) attract people fed up with both parties just to hand them to Republicans, and 2) have a credible that that forces Republicans to do his bidding.

    • sprite0@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      of all the things to shit on him for this isn’t it. being multi cultural is the only culture we have and almost all of us are immigrants.

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        White rich South African are devoid of culture just like every other rich profligate. They have no nation, creed, or ideals just an insatiable avarice.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          That’s not true, the Musk family have a rich culture and long history of…

          *checks notes

          Supporting white supremacy and trying to overthrow democracy in several nations.

  • glitchdx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    5 months ago

    I fail to see how splitting up the fascists is anything but a good thing. Let them fight.

    • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah, this seems like it may actually be some good news in this endless sea of shit we’ve been in. But the chances of it actually going anywhere are pretty slim.

      • Triasha@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Liberals hate musk and won’t vote for his party. Split the stupid vote and watch Dems win unwinnable races. If he pulls that off for 2 election cycles you might even see Republicans go in on ranked choice voting.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I just want to remind anyone thinking that this is a good thing because it will siphon off voters from the Republican Party - Elon Musk is only doing this because Trump cut the EV mandate from the Big Bullshit Bill and didn’t appoint his guy to NASA. No matter what he says about spending or debt ceilings, he doesn’t care about any of it and was in the loop the entire time that legislation was being crafted. He’s still only in this for himself, just as he was when he gleefully threw a Nazi salute on stage thinking he just got everything he could ever want when he bought the president his office.

    • just_another_person@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      As much as I fucking hate Musk, he does understand two things:

      1. EVs will never be the mainstream without federal and state project support
      2. Funneling money from the government to billionaires is the worst thing for an economy

      What I find fucking mind-blowing is that this idiot is selling a shoddy EV and solar product at premium costs to other idiots, but very much aligned with Democrats on the two points above. Not only did he back the wrong horse, he straight up accidentally got on the wrong horse, and rode it threw towns away from where he was living very comfortably.

      Now this fucking moron needs to invent new ways to make Tesla appealing to the “normies” because nobody is buying his bullshit stalling tactics or premium pricing for sub-par products.

      I’ve got my popcorn ready, but the siphoning of votes away from Trump is just the butter on top.

      • Furbag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Not sure I agree with point #2 - I’d be willing to bet he would love to funnel some of that sweet tax money into his own pocket, but he doesn’t want it in the form of tax breaks for income earners, he wants it in the form of EV subsidies for Tesla, which Trump denied him by cutting the EV tax incentive from the spending bill. I don’t think he even acknowledges that tax breaks for billionaires are bad for the economy, just that the big bullshit bill is bad for him specifically.

        On everything else, though, I agree wholeheartedly. His brand is toxic now, and without being able to sell a sub-par product at dirt-cheap prices, he’s going to get a heavy dose of reality when consumers reject his rolling coffins in favor of cheaper alternatives.

        • just_another_person@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          If course you don’t. That’s why you side with Trump. The fact that “trickle down economics” has been disproven time and time again means nothing to you folks.

          • Furbag@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            Huh? Did you reply to the wrong person? Because I don’t side with Trump. Check my comment history.

      • chilicheeselies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        I dont see how you can draw that conclusion for item 2. He claims to care about the deficit, not funelling money to billionaires. Belive me, he would have you living under a bridge eating gruel before he would touch anything that affects his wealth.

      • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago
        1. EVs will never be the mainstream without federal and state project support

        in not sure about that… imo EVs would be relatively comparable if ICE vehicles and oil didn’t have massive subsidies at every stage from governments… more if negative externalities were properly accounted for

        or maybe not: in australia we have a fuel excise and EV credit and they’re still pretty expensive relative to ICE

        • just_another_person@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          EV’s only become popular when cheaper. It’s a fact.

          Not everyone lives in areas where solar installs at ean option. The offset doesn’t make sense when you go north or south of the globe where the sun don’t shine.

        • dickalan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          I know you meant internal combustion engine, but it gave me a pause because I thought you were talking about ice agents

          • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            i absolutely agree and considered using a different phrase but it’s been the phrase to use for fossil fuel powered cars for so long i decided they don’t get to exclusively steal it

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I think total cost of ownership is lower for EVs for people that have reasonable electricity rates and can charge at home, but that’s a tougher sell and most people aren’t even sure that it will work out unless they try it.

      • Furbag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Sure, that’s fine, I just don’t want people to lose sight of the bigger picture here. Musk is not an altruist. He’s not the good guy all of a sudden. He didn’t grow a conscience after falling out with Trump.

        If this political party ever gets off the ground, which it probably won’t, Musk will always have a controlling interest in it. He will never ever let the party move away from enabling and enacting his agenda, and his alone. He doesn’t give a single shit or a wipe about helping Americans. He wants to protect his fortune by taking control of the government apparatus to end regulations or investigations that impede the companies he is in charge of. That’s it.

        I certainly hope that Democrats will see this for the nakedly transparent political maneuver that it is, and not get swept up in the idea of a 3rd party founded and controlled by a billionaire will bring any kind of meaningful change to the system. And I believe they will - we rejected Bloomberg and Steyer in 2020 because they were out-of-touch billionaires who tried to buy their way into the party, and I think that Democrats are not so easily fooled by the obvious bad faith rich cunts who try to buy their way into the public zeitgeist. I just worry that people will see this move by Musk as “the enemy of my enemy is my friend” and shift closer to his values as a result. He might be the enemy of your enemy, but he’s still an an enemy as far as I’m concerned.

        • theangryseal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          This isn’t what anyone is celebrating.

          They don’t think for a second that Musk will do anything positive.

          What they’re hoping for is republicans to split somewhere near the middle, some in support of MAGAts and some in support of Musk, which could lead to more people voting for a democrat than a republican. Votes that would have gone toward a MAGAt will go to Musk. That is the prayer.

        • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          Nobody who actually cares about others thinks Musk is the good guy. This is strictly an evil vs. evil situation.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    Cool. Let the douches be split between who is more “maga” (baby talk) than the other and split all the worst people into an ineffective nothingburger when it comes to the ballot box.

    I’m so tired of the various factions of the left pitting themselves against each other (and letting elitists/Russian and Chinese troll farms do this to them, too).

    About time to have some extreme division on the wingnuts.

  • BlueZen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    knowing musk ox, the party name will spell something juvenile

    C onservatives U nited as N ationalist T rolls

  • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    5 months ago

    How many weeks before he gets bored and abandons it when things don’t immediately work, just like everything else in his useless life?

    • Match!!@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 months ago

      unlike rockets or cars, political party success in America is measured in dollars

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 months ago

        He already bought himself an entire department with no oversight but got bored of it after a few months.

        • AZX3RIC@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          In 1962, Congress created the role of “special government employee,” which allows the executive branch, the legislative branch and independent federal agencies to bring on employees for specific roles on a temporary basis.

          SGEs are limited to working for the government for no more than 130 days out of a 365-day period, though they can work multiple years, and they can either be paid or unpaid. NPR has reported that Musk is not being paid for his work with DOGE.

          • ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            If you’re just going to copy and paste from an NPR article, you might as well provide a link while you’re at it.

          • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            He didn’t make it to 130 days. He never mentioned that. Also, the law does not constrain this administration. He got bored when he didn’t immediately become loved and gave up like the little baby he is. Stop giving these bumbling oligarchs the benefit of the doubt and a veneer of legitimacy. You are an active part of the problem when you do.

  • buttnugget@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    5 months ago

    The funniest thing about stuff like this is that there are already a hundred political parties in the US. Every time someone says “we need a third party,” it reminds me of that xkcd comic about standards and protocols.

    • PixxlMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 months ago

      When people say that they want a third part I doubt they mean it literally, as in they believe there are literally only two parties, but rather I suspect they mean that they want a third party which is large and influencial.

      • buttnugget@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Sort of. They usually mean it literally, but it’s rooted in the misunderstanding of the political system that most folks have. And I don’t blame them for this, I just find the grandiosity amusing.

    • sik0fewl@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      5 months ago

      That is a ridiculous comparison. More political parties are a good thing.

      • RichardDegenne@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        5 months ago

        They would be, if the political and electoral system supported it.

        Which is obviously not the case in the US.

        • paraphrand@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Do you think there’s any chance that Musk can break whatever is formally boxing out other parties? It seems like just by being who he is right now in history, he could break things.

          We need to hope he breaks the current norm in a way that doesn’t put him in power, and opens things up for proper multi-party elections in the future. That’s a lot to hope for though, I guess.

          When I think about this, I can imagine Musk fans telling tales of his 4D chess moves and how his plan all along has been to overhaul and improve elections. Or some other bullshit.

          • RichardDegenne@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Outsourcing your revolution to the billionaire oligarch has to be one of the takes of all time.

            Me: Can we have Lenin?

            Mom: We have Lenin at home.

            Lenin at home:

        • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          I think the opportunity is better this time around.

          Democrats and Republicans secured a two party system and locked everyone else out because of a few things:

          1. Finances and resources.
          2. Media coverage. During debates, they had secret handshake deals to only argue against each other, which forces media to only cover them.

          Musk got resources. He spent a lot to get Orange Man in power. And TV and news is already lower on the trust scale, as the population leans towards social media.

          There’s a few other issues like local/state elections that won’t be friendly to non-Democrat/non-republican parties.

          Of course, this is all a pipe dream and like the libertarian party, it’ll quickly get thrown aside and the politicians will fold into one of the two parties.