doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.105.3.440

  • yarr@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 month ago

    Is this why Republican senators keep getting caught kissin’ with other men in public restrooms?

    • Alaik@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      1 month ago

      I mean grindr always reports an increase in traffic around the republican conventions.

      • yarr@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        This sounds like it would be something that’s an interesting anecdote and a “GOTCHA”. Has there ever been any confirmation of this from Grindr? As amusing of a story it is, it’s only really useful information if it’s provable.

  • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Even though this study seems kinda doubtworthy, that’s what I’ve said for over 3 decades now. The louder they scream “evil!” The more “evil” they themselves are.

    • nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      it was 64 people. edit: and also, even 29 or something like this is a lot, assuming that they are selected kind of randomly and not all belong to the same social group etc. If only 3 showed a reaction like described, sure. We need more data. but with a hitrate of 100%, what do you expect to happen if you 10x the number?

  • flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Homophobes: resist those evil urges, don’t give it to the gay sex, you can do it just say no…

    The rest of us: uh, who’s gonna tell them

      • RBWells@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 month ago

        Has this man never eaten a sandwich? Pizza? French Fries? Tacos? What is this nonsense?

      • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        61
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s outright disgusting.

        If you need to regularly scratch your anus, go see a doctor.

        Also, even if you do need to scratch your anus, why wouldn’t you be able to eat with your hands? SURELY you sanitize them properly RIGHT? RIGHT?!

        • P1nkman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 month ago

          People who think like this don’t wash their hands after going to the toilet, so of course it’s disgusting for them.

          • Pot8o@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Oh I didn’t realise COVID made your anus itchy! Is it a new variant? 😂 Edits for spelling cos I can’t apparently.

        • Semester3383@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          1 month ago

          If you need to regularly scratch your anus, you probably have parasites. That’s one of the prime ways for some species of parasites (roundworms, I think?, probably tapeworms too?) to spread.

        • Angel Mountain@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Eat with the right, touch anus with the left and always wash hands before you eat. Developed cultures have done this for ages. And they have clean bumholes because they wash instead of only smearing with toilet paper. That shit is disgusting.

          Washing can also help against the itchiness. As well as non-synthetic underwear. If those don’t help, do indeed see a doctor.

    • GraniteM@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Homophobes: “We can’t legalize gay marriage! The birth rate would collapse! If men could marry men, then what reasonable man would ever choose to marry a disgusting, weak, woman over a strong, virile, muscular, sweaty, musky, oily, maaaannnnnn…

      The rest of us: Dude. Bro. Dude.

  • logicbomb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    155
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s always important in science to do the experiment or study, even if you’re pretty sure you already know the answer.

    Sometimes, the result will be surprisingly counter-intuitive. And other times, like in this study, it confirms what seems blatantly obvious.

    What could it possibly mean when a man who identifies as heterosexual feels threatened by the mere existence of homosexual men? What could it mean???

    • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      I always assumed that homophobia is about a subconscious fear of spreading diseases and stuff, as that’s more common in gay people by a lot.

      • logicbomb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Don’t conflate promiscuity with homosexuality. There are plenty of gay people who are monogamous and who are no more likely to spread disease than anybody else. And there are plenty of promiscuous heterosexual people who are spreading diseases.

        Also, you shouldn’t apologize for this bigotry by saying it’s subconscious. This is learned behavior.

        • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 month ago

          you’re right, i should have been more careful about this.

          i just contacted an old friend of mine who had that view, and he too says that he’s changed his mind about this and no longer sees it that way.

    • Nikls94@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 month ago

      And then they’re like "huh… that’s weird“ and discover time travel by accident.

    • catty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      And sometimes, just sometimes, studies are framed to find what the experimenter wants them to find.

  • BreadOven@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 month ago

    Funny, but the sample size? Would like to see a larger study (probably would show the same results).

    I also wonder if they considered bi individuals in the non-homophobic group.

    If these are easily answered by reading the paper, I’ll see it now, when I actually read it.

    • gwilikers@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      Bi - the invisible sexual orientation.

      Glad that Lower Decks has a bi protagonist. Its really sad that bisexual people just seem to be completely invisible within the broader culture.

      • BreadOven@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I have not watched it. I love me some star trek, but haven’t really gotten into the “new” ones. Mainly because I need to pirate them, and haven’t yet.

        It is a good point on bi individuals being somewhat invisible. It seems like most people just assume their orientation by the person they’re with, or people they most commonly “go for”.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Maybe this explains that odd “prayer” group hug of Republicans in the Capitol that was posted these days ;-)

  • thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Waitwaitwait… The homophobic men displaying arousal: Yeah, sure, of course.

    But NONE of the non-homophobic men got even a little ruffled? That’s the real surprise here.

  • hexonxonx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ve always assumed this (and assumed that other people assumed this), because if you talk to homophobes they’ll eventually say something like “it’s a choice!” because it’s a choice for them. It’s not a choice for me because gay porn doesn’t turn me on – and if it did I wouldn’t care anyway because that’s how I was raised. But it DOES turns them on, AND they were raised in an environment where this is THE WORST THING EVER, so it upsets them and they get all irrational and punchy (lesson learned: DO NOT discuss this theory with a homophobe.)

    TLDR; IMHO Homophobes who think orientation is a choice are closeted gays because logic.

    It would be nice to see a better study. Interesting if one hasn’t been done in all this time…