• Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 个月前

      It’s really not helpful unless you filter the results carefully.

      If you fail to understand when it bullshits you, which is most is the time (literally), then you walk away with misinformation and/or a much larger problem than you initially sought to solve.

      • FireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.fr
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 个月前

        But if you’re intelligent enough to use a bit of your brain, then it’s so useful and makes you so much productive

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 个月前

    AI is a mistake and we would be better off if the leadership of OpenAI was sealed in an underground tomb. Actually, that’s probably true of most big org’s leadership.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 个月前
    1. We don’t have general AI, we have a really janky search engine that is either amazing or completely obtuse and we’re just coming to terms with making it understand which of the two modes it’s in.

    2. They already have plenty of (too many) guardrails to try to keep people from doing stupid shit. Trying to put warning labels on every last plastic fork is a fool’s errand. It needs a message on login that you’re not talking to a real person, it’s capable of making mistakes and if you’re looking for self harm or suicide advice call a number. well, maybe ANY advice, call a number.

    • ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 个月前

      I disagree. Stupid people are ruining the world. In my country, half the population is illiterate and enabling psychopaths. People who have no critical thinking skills are dragging down the rest of humanity. Off the bridge they go, if that saves the species as a whole. Things need to stop getting worse constantly. Let AI take them.

  • BB84@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 个月前

    It is giving you exactly what you ask for.

    To people complaining about this: I hope you will be happy in the future where all LLMs have mandatory censors ensuring compliance with the morality codes specified by your favorite tech oligarch.

  • OldChicoAle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 个月前

    Do we honestly think OpenAI or tech bros care? They just want money. Whatever works. They’re evil like every other industry

  • blargh513@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 个月前

    There’s nothing wrong with AI, these contextual problems are not a mistake–they’re a choice.

    AI can be trained for deeper analysis and to root out issues like this. But that costs compute cycles. If you’re selling a service, you want to spend as little on compute power as possible while still being able to have a product that is viewed as good enough to pay for.

    As with all things, the root of this problem is greed.

  • catty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 个月前

    Headlines like this is comedy I’d pay for. Or, at least laugh at on Have I got news for you.

  • latenightnoir@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    5 个月前

    “I’m so sorry I’m repeatedly punching you in the teeth, I have no idea how to stop! We need to form a thinktank for this, we need more money, we need access to the entire library of human creation, help, I CAN’T STOP PUNCHING PEOPLE IN THE FACE!”

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 个月前

      There are various other reports of CGPT pushing susceptible people into psychosis where they think they’re god, etc.

      It’s correct, just different articles

      • TimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 个月前

        ohhhh are you saying the img is multiple separate articles from separate publications that have been collaged together? that makes a lot more sense. i thought it was saying the bridge thing was symptomatic of psychosis.

        yeahh people in psychosis are probably getting reinforced from LLMs yeah but tbqh that seems like one of the least harmful uses of LLMs! (except not rly, see below)

        first off they are going to be in psychosis regardless of what AI tells them, and they are going to find evidence to support their delusions no matter where they look, as thats literally part of the definition. so it seems here the best outcome is having a space where they can talk to someone without being doubted. for someone in psychosis, often the biggest distressing thing is that suddenly you are being lied to by literally everyone you meet, since no one will admit the thing you know is true is actually true, why are they denying it what kind of cover up is this?! it can be really healing for someone in psychosis to be believed

        unfortunately it’s also definitely dangerous for LLMs to do this since you cant just reinforce the delusions, you gotta steer towards something safe without being invalidating. i hope insurance companies figure out that LLMs are currently incapable of doing this and thus must not be allowed to practice billable therapy for anyone capable of entering psychosis (aka anyone) until they resolve that issue

    • mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 个月前

      The whole idea of funeral companies is astonishing to me as a non-American. Lmao do whatever with my body i’m not gonna pay for that before i’m dead

      • Sergio@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 个月前

        The idea is that you figure all that stuff out for yourself beforehand, so your grieving family doesn’t have to make a lot of quick decisions.

          • Sergio@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 个月前

            I personally agree. But if I pay for the cheapest option ahead of time, it hits different than a loved one deciding on the cheapest option for me, especially if they are grieving and a salesperson is offering them a range of options. Also, some people just want a big funeral for their own emotional reasons I dunno.