axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe to People Twitter@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 5 months agoSatire is indistinguishable from stupiditylemmy.cafeimagemessage-square250fedilinkarrow-up1946arrow-down111file-text
arrow-up1935arrow-down1imageSatire is indistinguishable from stupiditylemmy.cafeaxEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe to People Twitter@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square250fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareSaltSong@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down1·5 months agoAnd what, leave the apartments empty? Have them earn zero money, rather than some money?
minus-squareIlovethebomb@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·5 months agoAs per my other replies, typically sell the property to an owner-occupier, which is a big problem if you can’t afford to buy a property.
minus-squareSaltSong@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 months agoA run of market sales would drive down the price. And if you can’t afford to rent, then got being able to buy is not a significant difference.
minus-squareJiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·5 months agopublic ownership with rents based on the costs of maintaining the properties properly
minus-squareIlovethebomb@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down5·5 months agoThat is actually a far better idea than rent control, yes.
And what, leave the apartments empty? Have them earn zero money, rather than some money?
As per my other replies, typically sell the property to an owner-occupier, which is a big problem if you can’t afford to buy a property.
A run of market sales would drive down the price.
And if you can’t afford to rent, then got being able to buy is not a significant difference.
public ownership with rents based on the costs of maintaining the properties properly
That is actually a far better idea than rent control, yes.