• PonyOfWar@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    175
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    No music, no images… two things that have defined Human culture for millennia. The Taliban must really love leading a miserable existence.

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Make sure that mountain is free of any trees before taking that scenic picture.

    This essentially bans all photography - it’s fucking weird.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Afghan Art exhibition:
      Here’s a picture of a brick.

      Afghan religious leader:
      Should we execute him? Just to be safe you know!

    • Dicska@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah, you just have to photoshop X eyes and a stuck out tongue on every living thing. They didn’t say anything about dead things.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wonder where the limit is.

      Like is it just photos or all depictions? If it’s all depictions, how far does it go? Will certainly combinations of letters be banned? :O :P :) \o/

      If so, will kanji be banned as well? We Lemmings all know this one by now

      :.|:;

      And I don’t know any actual kanji but I do know lots of their origins are depictions of living things, plants, animals, people.

  • ⓝⓞ🅞🅝🅔@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I really, really wish the linked article explained more. What are they playing at? This is such a confusing level of control.

      • Obinice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        Okay but what about the image cast on our retinas through our eyeballs that we use to see?

        Those are imperfect imitations of reality also. What’s their stance on those images…

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why only images of sentient beings though? Did God not create the rest of it too?

    • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      God doesn’t want you to mix fabrics or eat certain foods on certain days. “Confusing level of control” is on brand.

      It’s not about making sense though. It’s about making you do what they want so that you know who is in control.

      • [deleted] in lemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Not mixing fabrics and certain food practices were originally based on lived experience, like safety guidance, before getting coopted by religion. Kosher practices avoid cross contamination, and mixed fabrics could have something to do with temperature regulation in desert areas where it swings between extreme heat and cold daily. Or it could have existed to discourage lying about prodict quality by those who would sneak in poor quality materials.

        When religion got ahold of these concepts they were absolutely twisted into controlling people.

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      According to wikipedia, that isn’t even a problem within the Quran itself, but rather a hadith (oral tradition) from some other fellow: “Sahih Bukhari explicitly prohibits the making of images of living beings, challenging painters to “breathe life” into their images and threatening them with punishment on the Day of Judgment.”

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        But they still have TV, right? They did the last time the Taliban was in charge. I remember a news segment about it way back when the war started. The programming was mostly a bunch of religious stuff and their idea of news. So I guess no more news? Or no more TV? Or just text…

        • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          The russian way is to set up extremely restrictive laws covering everyone as guilty, so a governing body can use them to charge everyone they want. I guess, talibs learnt some of that wisdom visiting Kremlin while being a designated terrorist organization here, kek - and this status would get lifted in coming months.

        • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          I suspect some of them might still have cell phones with internet. I wonder if they’ll also force people to use text images as avatars on twitter or something

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s accurate to historical Islamic practice, unlike a lot of their crazy shit, but nobody else does it because it’s going to be insanely difficult to work with.

    • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Except historically the arts flourished under Islamic rule. While Islam does have an anti icon streaks it was never enforced save for the depiction of the prophet Mohammad.

  • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Obviously I’m not pro Taliban or this, but one thing that has been amusing me has been the US institute for peace decrying the fact that they outlawed poppy production again because it increases poverty. Western media on the subject is a mixture of it’s bad and it won’t work (they’ve actually reduced poppy production by over 90 percent though). Pre war we were justifying sanctions due to heroin production, post war it actually increased under American administration and the fragile kleptocracy we encouraged(which “banned” poppy production), and now it’s bad they’re slashing and burning poppy fields.

    https://www.usip.org/publications/2023/06/talibans-successful-opium-ban-bad-afghans-and-world

  • Zement@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Now it’s just a bunch of religious fascists trying to one up each other.

    Give it enough time and they have implemented so many rules, no rule is relevant any more

  • Pyflixia@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Give them enough time, they’re going to bar eating and basic survival instincts. Whatever those are to them.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    what can you expect from an undead demonic army prepping for the holy battle of megiddo?