• hperrin@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      That’s not even the worst thing about him. He also invented JavaScript.

        • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Sure I use that too but you should have at least one chromium based browser for certain features though.

            • Zink@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              This is my setup, and I never actually use ungoogled chromium.

              If I have some kind of issue that I need to work around immediately rather then figure out, I usually just open Firefox and try that.

            • Bluewing@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Vivaldi is OK, but I would replace it with something else. It’s a pretty busy UI and I have had issues with it freezing in Fedora 42 KDE.

            • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Yes some tools do not work with Firefox. It‘s a niche but I‘ve run into it a few times just recently. For example with a gamepad enabler tool where Firefox simply won‘t be able to see your USB input.

              • HorseFD@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                The thing is, Firefox follows web standards. Chrome doesn’t always and websites put in custom code that works only with Chrome.

                I’d rather use the browser that follows standards.

                • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Well I‘m not saying you should use chromium as your main browser. In fact I think you shouldn‘t. But sometimes there is no way around it. It‘s okay to be realistic about these things.

            • Electricd@lemmybefree.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Most problems are because of how Mozilla works. According to some devs, they gatekeep some contributions and they don’t really act and communicate with the community like FOSS projects are expected to. They also spend a lot of money on some - useless - stuff. They’re really slow to improve their software and Firefox defaults with some questionable stuff (regular pings, Google bullshit…)

              The Better bird dev talks a bit about this, and you also have some other resources: https://youtu.be/ugnOM2mzgNU (I don’t remember every link and everything I’ve seen but this should be a good start)

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      32
      ·
      3 months ago

      What does that have to do with the browser? Last I checked, browsers aren’t transphobic.

      You do you, but I personally refuse to make product choices based on the person who makes it. Brave is the least bad chromium browser, so I use it as a backup to my main Gecko-based browser. I’m not a fan of Mozilla either, but that’s irrelevant since I pick my software based on what it does, not based on the management of the company that builds it.

        • RiQuY@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Vivaldi is not open source, so for me it doesn’t count as a valid option.

        • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I‘m not even pro Brave but all that ad stuff is opt-in so it doesn‘t matter as long as you don‘t want to see ads. The arguments in this thread are starting to just loop in circles. Essentially using Brave is fine if you stick to the default. There‘s no sleazy stuff if you don‘t enable it and the CEO also doesn‘t make a dime from you if that‘s something you‘re concerned about. You could of course use a different chromium browser if you want but it‘s virtually the same thing.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          The only two there that bother me are the affiliate code thing (reminds me of the Honey drama) and installing extra software without consent. The first was a bad call and probably related with how their ad replacement stuff works (if anything, they should merely axe affiliate links; Firefox has that as an option), and this"solution" to the latter is pretty odd to me:

          reinstall the browser without admin rights

          Why would a browser need admin rights in the first place? I haven’t used Windows in well over a decade, so I don’t think that particular one would be an issue for me.

          The rest can be grouped as:

          • bugs - bug fixes generally don’t get prioritized until enough users complain; I would be very picky if I was an at risk person (activist or whatever) and would probably only use Tor browser
          • opt-in services
          • their marketing department

          My options for chromium browsers are:

          • something with ineffective ad blocking
          • Opera - I used it before it became a chromium browser, then it went downhill; not FOSS
          • Brave, with all its warts

          Since ad blocking and FOSS are my prerequisites, Brave basically wins by default.

          • Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Just block with unlock 🙉 why choose browser based on a ad block feature that is worse (injecting own ads/adware and therefore trying to dictate who is allowed to grab your attention) than the ad blocking extension?

            I recommend Firefox, due to best compatibility with uBlock (fuck manifest v3) and additionally have a DNS filter in your network, like pihole or adguard.

            On the go, use wireguard VPN to always be digitally home, and get your ads blocked (as well as tracking organisations) like that.

      • Engywook@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        3 months ago

        Actually, I consider Brave the best (or the least bed…) browser on the market. Period. The fact that it isn’t made by Mozilla is a plus for me.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          I don’t like Mozilla either, but here are my priorities in a web browser:

          1. FOSS
          2. Privacy tools - includes ad blocking; I’d actually be okay with ads if they didn’t track me
          3. Promotes open web standards - rendering engine diversity is critical here, I don’t want a repeat of the IE era
          4. Security
          5. Performance

          Firefox ticks all of them, and my issues with Mozilla as an org don’t really come into play. I use a fork on my phone, but I use Firefox on my laptop and desktop because I trust the binaries coming from my Linux distribution maintainers (part of 4).

          • Electricd@lemmybefree.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Brave also ticks all of them?

            at this point, Firefox’s development is not very much more open than Chromium’s

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              It doesn’t tick #3, hence why I use a Firefox browser as my main. If they had their own rendering engine, I would consider it as my main. But for now, it’s my backup in case I need a website that doesn’t work on Firefox (i.e. they use something Chrome-specific).

          • Engywook@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Good for you. I actively refuse to use it or any of its derivatives to avoid endorsing Mozilla by giving them market share. Additionally, I find that Brave just performs better (and needs one extension less to be functional).

      • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I would not choose to use a product made by people I disagree with but leaving that aside:

        Is it the least bad? Why not degoogled chrome? Or chromium? Even vivaldi seems like a better choice.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Ad blocking mostly. That’s literally all I need in a chromium browser, because I only use it on a handful of sites that don’t work properly in Firefox.

          Chromium is also okay, but no ad blocker. I have that installed as well in the really unlikely case that the ad blocker gets in the way.

          99% of my browsing is on a Firefox browser, and 99% of the rest is on Brave. I use it so infrequently the “time saved” metric is a merely seconds.

    • szymon@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      He could be next husband of Ivanka Trump - I don’t care

      If he provide good service for me - browser which fits my needs. I would even send him money every day

          • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            If fascism was a passive philosophy that didn’t hurt anyone then you might have a point. But as you can see recently it’s extremely dangerous and ruins lives.

            You may not want to mingle with politics, but it doesn’t have the same view.

            • NeilBrü@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors.

              Plato, The Republic bk. 1, 347c

      • Kris@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        That’s the logic of as long as it benefits ME I don’t care and I support them no matter what they do. This same logic has been applied to all the shitty things done in history like slavery, war and so forth, and the reason the world is the way it is.

          • Kris@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Of course that’s not possible, the issue here is being aware and not caring and in some cases supporting it for convenience and selfishness.

              • Kris@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                In my country, one of the most successful supermarkets is run by a fascist and he uses part of his fortune to finance our local fascist party, which is gaining strength every year by the way. Do we support fascism by buying in that supermarket? What if we suddenly started to boycott the supermarket to hell?

                My point is that they earn profits by using their services and in today’s society money is power. And from where the CEO got his power? From the millions of people with the mindset of “if it benefits me I don’t care”.

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    funny thing is ban evaders(the ones that make hundreds of accounts for OF or links) use it for its anti-fingerprinting which is useful against reddit(temporarily) ability to read the browser. i used to temporarily, and kinda explains why my last acc was only shadowbanned much later than thier purges.(i was hit by thier AI moderation as soon as switched to a different browser fork of FF)

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        oh yea i used pixel scan or something similar, ban evaders use these to check thier browser profile, and it partially shields it. there other similar browser scanners, but the thing is you also need proxies and anti-detect browsers to hide the rest of your activities, because reddit is just that invasive in detection.(hence all those bans.

          • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            im just simplifying it, they have other methods at thier tools. since recently it come to my attention they also indiscrminately shadowban too for no reason at all/. V3 captcha, browser, time and date, location, components. they detect vpn quite easily now,

    • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      What feature? Recall?? That’s Windows 11-specific and hasn’t even launched yet??

  • NoodlePoint@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    Simplewall allows direct control of internet access of any program and app; you can block CoPilot from accessing the internet.

    • Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      Oh so they’re just doing whatever Firefox is doing in private mode on Android that makes screenshots all black

  • 3dcadmin@lemmy.relayeasy.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Now whilst I enjoy all the comments I actually have to add something quickly that explains why this kind of thing happens. I recently worked with a rather old lady to find out why she was having so many issues with technology and stuff. I found out that when she started work in 1986 she was told that the shared password in her department at the local hospital was “password” and so she has used that on everything she can since to remember it… other gems that they used on whole departments included “qwerty” and “123456” and the best one of all “letmeinnow”. On whole shared networks of 100+ machines…

    • Pamasich@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Tbf, anything that isn’t AI Windows blocks the feature. Including regular Windows.

      People just need to not fall for the scam edition and they don’t have to deal with this shit.

    • AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Actually, Linux doesn’t block windows, it just isn’t windows.

      Just reason saying.

      • thann@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Actually it does! When youre installing, just delete the windows boot partition and your done!

        • somerandomperson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Heck, wipe the entire disk!

          (based on a real life experience)

          (windows just kept standing no matter what partition i deleted so i wiped the disk clean)

        • Novaling@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I recently decided to switch from using Atomic Fedora to reg KDE Fedora (cause tinkering and bypassing atomic features got on my nerves), and I almost went through with wiping everything and only having Linux installed. And then I realized I probably wouldn’t be able to do some tests for college cause they use anti-cheating software (lockdown browser) which they probably wouldn’t like if I ran it in a VM or wine…

          But man, once I’m out of college, I’m probably wiping Windows for good! Also gonna factory reset that partition so it at least takes way less space on my drive.

          (Side note: the other hesitation is that I’m 90% kernel updates nuked Bluetooth for me around March (It worked when I rolled back to January/February releases) and I do have zoom classes sometimes. Like, do I just have to buy a Bluetooth dongle to deal with this?)

        • ohshit604@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Discord… Still isn’t public?

          They’re certainly talking about it but they haven’t announced a date yet.

          Apologies, I striked the lines out of my previous comment. It simply was an example of how you still can be captured.

      • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        3 months ago

        Honestly it largely is.

        Personally I like sharing crash reports, but even then, the user should be able to turn that off if you like.

        Telemetry should be 100% opt-in.

        • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          30
          ·
          3 months ago

          Honestly it largely is.

          I mean, by definition, it isn’t.

          It’s anonymous and not malicious in nature. It’s a diagnostic and engagement measuring tool.

          • Tattorack@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            And how do you know it’s not malicious in nature? I’d like to know what your definition of “malicious” is if you’re just fine with letting a Corpo run system look at everything you’re doing.

            • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              15
              ·
              3 months ago

              And how do you know it’s not malicious in nature?

              Because I have a functioning brain.

              I’d like to know what your definition of “malicious” is

              Malware is designed to hurt you by extracting your personal information or resources.

              Telemetry is designed to give developers feedback about product/functionality usage and is anonymous.

              you’re just fine with letting a Corpo run system look at everything you’re doing.

              I’m not, and it’s not. Unlike you, I actually checked what data telemetry gathers and I’m perfectly fine with it. It’s inconsequential and anonymous.

          • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            24
            ·
            3 months ago

            diagnostic

            I think it is useful to send crash reports, but the user should have power over it (see: when macOS generates a crash report, it asks the user if they would like to send it)

            engagement measuring

            That is your data they are taking to make money off of without your consent, and I consider that malicious. There are ways to do that with consent. See: Steam’s annual hardware survey

            • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              3 months ago

              That is your data they are taking to make money off of without your consent

              I mean… They’re a for-profit company, so literally anything they do is to make money.

              But it’s not “my data”, it’s anonymous. The “engagement” info is in relation to features. That’s why some features are removed - because nobody uses them. Or rather: not enough people use them to warrant maintenance.

            • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              3 months ago

              Are you a tech-illiterate person?

              If not, explain how is it malicious.

        • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          24
          ·
          3 months ago

          I don’t know, maybe because I understand the definition of “spyware” and “telemetry”?

          • ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            3 months ago

            Well, semantically yes, not all telemetry is spyware. However regarding Windows telemetry it’s indistinguishable from spyware - you have no idea nor control over the data gathered, measured and processed.

            The crux is that Windows telemetry is opt out, opting out can’t be done during installation, and historically opting out wasn’t sticky. Additionally some Windows telemetry is still being sent despite opting out.

            That makes Windows telemetry fulfill all spyware criteria.

            • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              3 months ago

              However regarding Windows telemetry it’s indistinguishable from spyware - you have no idea nor control over the data gathered, measured and processed

              Ah, so you’re another one of those fear-mongers?

              Here’s the Required Diagnostic Events Fields (required telemetry) documentation.

              Keeping in mind that it’s anonymous - which parts of this are you so vehemently against sending to Microsoft?

              That makes Windows telemetry fulfill all spyware criteria.

              The shittiest spyware in history, I guess, considering it’s all anonymous…

      • Fijxu@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        54
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I don’t think taking screenshots of everything you do every few seconds is telemetry.

        • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          42
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s not, but it’s also not spyware - it’s local, encrypted, AND optional.

          • veni_vedi_veni@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            27
            ·
            3 months ago

            Optional like how it reminds me every 3 days that it wants my info for “customization” purposes, and I can only sleep the notification for another 3 days instead of telling it to fuck off?

            They have been so predatory, at this point no one should see anything they do as benefiting end users.

            • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              3 months ago

              If it does that, outrage will be understandable.

              Getting outraged about something they said will be 100% optional and hasn’t even released yet is just childish.

            • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              3 months ago

              So you’re saying you haven’t bothered to read about Recall at all, you just assumed it’s going to be enabled by default?

              • Landless2029@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                3 months ago

                Until a windows update kicks in and somehow turns it on for the world. thanks but no thanks. I’ll be disabling this not with a reg key but with local policy or DSC if I have to use a windows machine for personal again.

                I switched to Linux 2 months ago.

                • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Until a windows update kicks in and somehow turns it on for the world.

                  I don’t know if this is a regional thing, but I’ve been using Windows since 3.11 and have NEVER had ONE instance of an update randomly turning on something that I’ve turned off before.

                • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  “Look at this fossil thinking it’s still 1990”, I guess?

                  Mate, did you miss how 30 years have passed? How the world change? Can you even begin to imagine the fine the EU would slap without a second thought on MS if they tried pulling something like suddenly grabbing these screenshots from users’ devices?

          • ifmu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            33
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Microsoft is known for making things “optional” at first then eventually forcing it down everyone’s throats. Removing offline accounts is one of them.

            It’s not so much the technology itself is malware, but its behavior replicates that of malware.

            • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              3 months ago

              Right. So you’re all panicking just in case.

              That’s what’s being swept under the rug as “alarmists being loud”.

              • ifmu@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                The same way you have a lock on your front door “just in case”. It’s not emotional. It’s logical.

                • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  The lock is there. The whole thing is encrypted.

                  If they somehow go through encryption, they won’t just have the EU on their arses, governments of the entire world will be after them, because they trust that this encryption system makes their data secure.

              • Not a replicant@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                3 months ago

                This also works: shift-F10 before you get to the network configuration, then type this and press enter start ms-cxh:localonly

                For either method, if you configure networking during setup, e.g. plug in an ethernet cable or give it the wi-fi password, it’ll keep returning to the online account screen. You need to do it prior to network config.

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    3 months ago

    Let me know when it is discovered that they in fact replaced MS Recall with their own version that was scraping your data in yet another sketchy attempt to make money.

    • Electricd@lemmybefree.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s probably the best chromium browser out there

      Firefox has done shit too

      sadly we don’t have a lot of choice, but they’re one of the least worse

      • kadu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Firefox has done shit too

        Firefox has injected my URLs with affiliate codes?

      • Leon@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 months ago

        Just don’t use Chromium unless you for some reason absolutely have to. Mozilla is just another corporation, but they’re not exactly threatening to monopolise the internet. Google is, and using Chromium directly aids in their effort to do so.

        • Electricd@lemmybefree.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s not that bad. Sure, having more choice is good, but it’s not as life threatening as you make it seem

          Using android and stock ROMs is a bigger problem

          • Leon@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            3 months ago

            I think it’s a compounding issue, primarily of Google products just kind of being the “default.”

            Google pays to be the primary search engine in Firefox, on iOS, and sets themselves as the default on their operating systems. They, wherever possible also set their browser as default. Yes, Chromium is open source, but they have the ultimate final say, and no one seems to have the interest in forking it. This puts Google in a similar position that Microsoft was in in the 90s and early 00s, where they can essentially hijack the web and force their ideas through whether others want to or not.

            We saw this with Google forcing Manifest v3, all Chromium-based browsers essentially just had to follow suit. That was just Manifest v3 however, who’s to say what else they’ll do?

            Then there’s my tinfoil hat worry that Google essentially being the window to the web for so many people, on an OS, browser, and discoverability level is just overall a cause for worry. That’s not even considering their communications and media platforms.

            • Electricd@lemmybefree.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              I’m pretty sure if Firefox/Mozilla decides to change their policy on something, most forks of firefox will have no choice but follow the same path

              afaik all firefox forks are really small, just like chromium forks

              Mozilla might not have as much conflicting interests though, I admit it

              • Leon@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                3 months ago

                Oh yeah, absolutely. There are no good options for a truly libre web, unfortunately. :(

              • Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                3 months ago

                Perfect is the enemy of good.

                Gecko is still way more sympathetic than chromium, to me. Even if it is not perfect either.

      • rozodru@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        sure there are choices. I don’t use either. if you believe there are only 2 choices out there…man you have no idea.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        An unrepentant homophobe who accused people who dislike him for his homophobic views/actions as being closed-minded and bigoted for disliking him over it.

        You can’t make this shit up