• blattrules@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I thought he was going to deregulate ai; this seems like regulation to me. Add it to the pile mountain of lies.

  • Xaphanos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 months ago

    Who is responsible? The SW creator? The trainer? The source of the training data? The hosting data center?

    What are the penalties? Who enforces this? Who investigates?

    • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      lol look at this guy still thinking in terms of “the crime comes first”.

      You arrest the dissident, then choose which ‘law’ they’ve broken. Don’t worry about the details. ‘Who is responsible’? The guy you just arrested. Duh.

  • wjrii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    5 months ago

    LLMs shall prioritize historical accuracy, scientific inquiry, and objectivity, and shall acknowledge uncertainty where reliable information is incomplete or contradictory.

    This may not go how they think it will. As an aside, for the moment at least, this is only for AI used/procured by the federal government.

    • ReCursing@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 months ago

      Trans people have objectively existed historically and there is scientific evidence trans people are telling the truth. So what now?

  • frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    If promotion of diversity is pervasive and destructive, but LLMs are by definition trained on diverse datasets, are they not by default unpermitted?

    Beyond that, the conflation of fact with truth is really…something.

    Also how will a historically accurate model explain what happened to black people in the US before 1865 without concepts like systemic racism?

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      For the white supremacists in charge of the USA, the answer to your last question is that it’s forbidden to talk about Black history, and white people did nothing wrong. That is what they mean by historical accuracy. The fact that it’s false is irrelevant and unmentionable.

      Not sure what you mean about the conflation of fact and truth. They’re generally treated as pretty close concepts.

  • Irdial@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    So the administration wants to win the AI race through deregulation, except they want to regulate its social compass. Make it make sense

  • thatradomguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    In other words, they don’t want fake bias much like they don’t like fake news. They want their own bias. Great…

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    Since Trump’s brain is stuck in the 90s I’ll put this in a fashion that’s period appropriate: That’s fuckin retarded.