Just accept that sometimes people have ideas that are different from yours that hold value? It doesn’t add value to the discussion to just give anecdotal evidence while you refuse other people’s ideas.
Not taking sides in the argument above but “incorrecting” is where you try to correct what someone says but provide incorrect information when doing so.
I already have you tagged as “incorrecting me” from an earlier exchange where you did the same thing here…
https://purplesec.us/learn/responding-to-phishing-emails/#%3A~%3Atext=What+Happens+If+I+Reply%2Cphishing+attacks—so+never+reply.
Just accept that sometimes people have ideas that are different from yours that hold value? It doesn’t add value to the discussion to just give anecdotal evidence while you refuse other people’s ideas.
neither of you provided evidence.
and what the hell is “incorrecting” somebody??
Not taking sides in the argument above but “incorrecting” is where you try to correct what someone says but provide incorrect information when doing so.
I mean, that was so obvious from the word itself. The guy you replied to isnt very good at interpreting new words.