You must log in or register to comment.
You’re telling me these https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_tweezers
don’t look like traditional tweezers except really small?
…i find this funny…on so MANY lavels…
deleted by creator
I think she means “as an evolutionary biologist: you have no idea …”. Rather than “as an evolutionary biologist, you have no idea …”.
Well, I did indeed have no idea I was an evolutionary biologist…
You got through a doctoral program in evolutionary biology without knowing how to spell tweezers?
. . .
Okay.
Have you met people this educated in fields this specialized? They ain’t got time, or room in their brain, to care about spelling.
Yeahbut . . .”tweasers”? C’mon man. Just spell the band and put a T in front.
It’s too egregious, it has to be ragebait. And you know what, it worked
Does CRISPR count as tweasers?
the generated clankslops out of those stock photos will be hillariousy worse.
The last image: my dna hurts
Duh that is old tech, nowadays you enlarge the DNA to human size so you can easily pluck out individual nucleotides with regular tweezers.
I’m sure they also spend a lot of time staring face to face with a DNA strand too
Doctors: I’m helping
You’re creating strand breaks is what you’re doing.
deleted by creator
