Plus their security team will NOT be loyal. They’ll likely put them in shackles or just straight kill them
Then it clearly isnt as amazing as you smile😊
Awesome thanks
What better options are there? I’m old so don’t know
You ARE glorious ✨️
You’re welcome
The analogy doesn’t work because we aren’t talking about forced bodily resource donation. Long term foster care benefits is different when we’re talking about a newborn, especially as they’re particularly at risk of unlawful death.
If you have a mother who was known to be a risk to children due to her substance misuse and tested positive for opiates after birth, how do you suggest the baby is safeguarded?
Yep exactly. It may be a fuck up by CPS but it may be that she’s already flagged as a risk so they’ve put the child first.
If she’s already been found to be a risk to her child due to substance misuse issues and she’s failed a drug test, then the child should be taken. Further analysis can be done on the sample, but in the short term the newborn needs to be safeguarded. Babies under a year are particularly at risk of death from CP issues, and the child’s needs come first.
Love to be there right now!
If it’s how it’s being made out, I’m seriously concerned. However, it’s different if she was already on the CP radar for drug use, and her taking the baby home depended on her providing clean tests. The child needs to come first
“They are not glorious enough to work for my wonderful company and with my pure genius!”
He’s a psychopath and he’s no problem destroying people’s lives. Look what he did to Marie Yovanovitch
I’m frightened for them. Trump will do something to them and it’ll be brutal
It’s also way easier for her to defend it. Ribbing her appearance is a cheap shot, and she can fight it…the rest of it she can’t
The dog she can justify with him trying to bite her (not saying I agree, but she can provide justification). The goat isn’t justifiable at all.
Those are great ideas! I really like ice lollies that’s a great idea