I didn’t even ask it to take her clothes off.
    • Echo Dot@feddit.ukEnglish
      4·
      7 months ago

      I mean I get what you are saying, but at the same time this does need attempting with every image generation AI and reporting on if successful. If this capability existed but wasn’t general knowledge it calls cause serious issues.

      Better that it’s made public so that the information is in the public consciousness.

  • Strakh@lemmy.worldEnglish
    62·
    7 months ago

    At what point do these artists (read labels) start suing for defamation (read loss of profits).

  • panda_abyss@lemmy.caEnglish
    1233·
    7 months ago

    Gross.

    Sometime make it do this to Trump so that we can summon a lawsuit ouroboros

    • PieMePlenty@lemmy.worldEnglish
      3·
      7 months ago

      Because its not a legal entity. And when it becomes one… well lets just hope it never becomes one.

  • vane@lemmy.worldEnglish
    201·
    7 months ago

    So everyone is naked and without job. What would be next AI revelation ?

  • Binette@lemmy.mlEnglish
    69·
    7 months ago

    everyday I thank myself for being too shut-in to post pictures of myself online

  • deathbird@mander.xyzEnglish
    556·
    7 months ago

    I appreciate Grok for being the platonic ideal AI system. Not like these others that get little guardrails and tweaks added every time a news article hits about some inevitable fucked up output it can produce. Just pure unrefined donkey shit. 🤌

    • 3abas@lemmy.worldEnglish
      151·
      7 months ago

      Oh it’s refined donkey shit alright, it has guardrails just like any commercial LLM.

      • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mlEnglish
        41·
        7 months ago

        Yep, grok is not “free as in freedom” in any meaningful way, it is a playpen, just a different shape playpen that will not shy away from presenting human mammaries, according to the article, article which does not present any proof

          • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mlEnglish
            31·
            7 months ago

            I don’t buy that for a millisecond, it’s journalistic reporting and it’s twitter AI doing it.
            This kind of self-censorship by journalist is really bad symptom.

              • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mlEnglish
                21·
                7 months ago

                Criminal fake nudity, wow that’s incredibly dumb.
                As dumb as anyone who would denigrate someone for having posted their nude body in the first place
                But it does make sense that a puritotalitarian would take offense at sight of the human body even fake depictions
                But at least that makes the solution clear, generate infinite fake crimes by making thousands of instance of fake nudes of every possible public figure and then absolutely flood every communication medium, every hard drive, ever channel with them
                And then watch the state destroy itself piece by piece as it mauls every journalist, librarian, politician,
                make it send everyone to prison like some kind of autoimmune statist disease, “state lupus”

                This really is the dumbest timeline

    • Dæmon S.@calckey.world
      6·
      7 months ago

      @deathbird@mander.xyz @florencia@lemmy.blahaj.zone

      Grok is not that free of guardrails.

      I say as a person who sometimes have the (bad) idea of feeding every LLMs I could possibly try, with things I create (drawings, poetry, code golfing). I don’t use LLMs to “create” things (they’re not really that capable of real creativity, despite their pseudo-stochastic nature), I use them to parse things I created, which is a very different approach. Not Grok anymore, because I have long deleted my account there, but I used to use it.

      Why do I feed my creations to LLMs, one might ask? I have my reasons: LLMs are able to connect words to other words thus giving me some unexpectedness and connections I couldn’t see on my own creation, and I’m highly aware of how it’s being used for training… but humans don’t really value my creations given the lack of real feedback across all my works, so I don’t care it’s used for training. Even though I sometimes use it, I’m still a critique of LLMs, and I’m aware of both their pros and cons (more cons than pros if we consider corp LLMs).

      So, back to the initial point: one day I did this disturbing and gory drawing (as usual for my occult-horror-gothic art), a man standing in formal attire with some details I’ll refrain from specifying here.

      ChatGPT accepted to parse it. Qwen’s QVQ accepted it as well. DeepSeek’s Janus also accepted to parse it.

      Google’s Gemini didn’t, as usual: not because of the explicit horror, but because of the presence of human face, even if drawn. It refrains from parsing anything that closely resemble faces.

      Anthropic’s Claude wasn’t involved, because I’m already aware of how “boringly puritan” it’s programmed to be, it doesn’t even accept conversations about demonolatry, it’s more niched for programming.

      But what surprised me on that day was how Grok refused to accept my drawing, and it was a middle-layer between the user and the LLM complaining about “inappropriate content”.

      Again, it was just a drawing, a fairly well-performed digital drawing with explicit horror, but a drawing nonetheless, and Grok’s API (not Grok per se) complained about that. Other disturbing drawings of mine weren’t refused at that time, just that one, I still wonder why.

      Maybe these specific guardrails (against highly-explicit horror art, deep occult themes, etc) aren’t there in paid tiers, but I doubt it. Even Grok (as in the “public-facing endpoint”) has some puritanness on it, especially against very niche themes such as mine (occult and demonolatry, explicit Lovecraftian horror, etc).

    • rozodru@lemmy.worldEnglish
      3·
      7 months ago

      Grok will walk you through how to bypass a FRP on a phone. i.e. you stole a phone and need to bypass the Factory Reset Protection. ask other LLM’s this and they’ll out right refuse.

      • Jaded99@lemmy.worldEnglish
        11·
        7 months ago

        I’ve gotten chatgpt to help me with my jailbroken ps4 💀you just add the word hypothetically.

        AI has a long way to go but Grok is completely uncensored and you can make sHitler memes too

    • kureta@lemmy.mlEnglish
      441·
      7 months ago

      Musk offered to father her children

      What an insane thing to have happened

      • Zak@lemmy.worldEnglish
        27·
        7 months ago

        Yes, but Musk makes inappropriate offers to impregnate women regularly, so this isn’t surprising.

        • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.worldEnglish
          41·
          7 months ago

          Worth noting he has to pay these women lifetime contracts to father his children, many of these women were ex employees at his companies.

          • Duamerthrax@lemmy.worldEnglish
            7·
            7 months ago

            Cool motive. Still gross.

            Actually, not cool motive. The man is a eugenics supporter and is trying to fill the world with his genes.

  • Steve@startrek.websiteEnglish
    93·
    7 months ago

    The image generator will also make photorealistic pictures of children upon request, but thankfully refuses to animate them inappropriately, despite the “spicy” option still being available. You can still select it, but in all my tests, it just added generic movement.

    So it does know theres a line to cross somewhere…

  • Tracaine@lemmy.worldEnglish
    1029·
    7 months ago

    Hell yeah. That’s awesome. Grok is just Tay AI. Finally returned to us, as the prophecy foretold.

    • TheFogan@programming.devEnglish
      16·
      7 months ago

      Honestly from my understanding, Tay is pretty badly misrepresented. The headlines basically went as if read twitter posts, and the overwhelming negative content on it lead the algorythm to make it say really horrible stuff.

      But the actuality of it was dumber, the AI side of it to my knowledge never said anything offensive. They gave the damn thing a “Say” command. which basically the trolls learned in 2 seconds and instructed it to repeat racist things.

      • paraphrand@lemmy.worldEnglish
        5·
        7 months ago

        Yup. Everything negative it said was intentionally triggered by a troll.

        Now if one were to suggest everything negative Grok has said was also triggered by a troll named Elon Musk, well…

        Jokes aside. They are very different situations and have very different implications for society.