• DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Burn your “acquired media” to physical media now folks. The powers that be are purposely limiting physical media so the have an excuse to phase it out

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      8 months ago

      Or save them redundantly to several archive-quality hdds. Why have 20 blu-ray dvds for one copy of a collection when you could have 3 complete copies on 3 hdd. Both are life limited media, both will eventually require re-archiving. One has potential for mechanical failure, the other more likely to physically degrade. Pick your poison, or do one of each.

    • ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      Genuinely curious how are publishers limiting physical media? I haven’t bought a blu-ray in a long while.

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yeah, but that’s not some massive conspiracy to remove them. They just don’t sell, like CDs before them. Blu-ray never really won its format war. It just staved off the execution of discs for a few years.

          £25 for one movie is a hard sell when it will come to Disney+ in a month. Even more so when it can get you a VPN for 6 months and you can have it now.

        • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          Not the publishers fault, for the vast majority it’s by choice and not necessity that they don’t buy physical media anymore.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      “The powers that be” aren’t doing some kind of nefarious thing here. Physical media is only worth producing if they’re doing it at incredibly high volumes. The smaller the run, the more expensive it is for each individual unit. Fewer and fewer people are buying, and there are fewer and fewer physical devices out there capable of playing the media.

      For them, it’s a simple calculation of the cost of producing physical media, getting it from the factory to stores, paying the stores to shelve it, etc. vs. simply having a website with media files on it.

      While there are some people who still prefer physical media, for the most part consumers also prefer just going to a website and clicking a button vs. driving to a store, parking, searching the shelves in the hope they have what they’re looking for, and so-on. In addition, as fewer companies put out physical media, it’s harder to find the physical media you want in the stores, so more people prefer to go online, which leads to less demand for physical media, fewer choices on the shelves, and more demand for streaming.

      I’m sure the bonus of consumers rarely having a way to view a movie or listen to a song an unlimited number of times without paying is something the media companies also enjoy. But, the main reason physical media is disappearing isn’t some kind of conspiracy by the mysterious “powers that be”, it’s a simple profit calculation by accountants at Sony and Disney.

  • MystValkyrie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    It’s just a shame that DVDs and Blu-Rays for new movies aren’t really made anymore. They’re just leaving money on the table at this point that bootleggers in Malaysia are getting instead.

    But still, absolutely. DVD all the way. I fixed the cord I cut back in 2015 and I’m much better off for it.

    • Nangijala@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      There are still DVDs and Blurays being made for new movies. Some movies are 100% digital, but in my experience they tend to be the ones that the streaming platforms produce themselves and they have an interest in keeping people on their service.

      But most other movies still get dvds and blurays made and are still sold in stores.

      • MystValkyrie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Everyone seems to be telling me that there’s still new releases, but seemingly not for anything I’m interested in. The last Blu-Ray I’ve been able to pick up was WandaVision. There was a time where basically 100% of movies got physical releases and, acknowledging confirmation bias, it does feel like those times are gone.

        • JabbaTheThott@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          What are the movies that haven’t gotten releases you’ve wanted? For me anything I’ve wanted has gotten a release lately, but I don’t watch the most niche movies. So perhaps that’s my confirmation bias

    • monotremata@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      I guess it’s not technically a new movie, but I just bought the 4k blu ray rerelease of Dark City that came out this year. So there are still some new releases in the format.

      • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I’m not really sure what you mean. Yoda is responding to Obi-Wan who had just said “That boy is our last hope”. Yoda was referring to the fact that there is another Skywalker (Leia). So in this context, Luke would be physical media, Leia would be piracy, and the streaming services would be the Sith/Empire.

    • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      May I interest you in the !piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com wiki/megathread? Yo ho yo ho…

      I support creators as I can, but when there’s literally no other option to own it in a way it can’t be just taken from you I don’t feel there’s any strong argument against it.

      • rezifon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        … when there’s literally no other option to own it in a way it can’t be just taken from you …

        There’s at least one legal route that’s still viable.

        I buy lots of Blu-ray and 4K UHD discs. I rip them straight on to my Jellyfin server. In fact, there’s been renewed vitality in disc releases during the past few years. Small shops like Shout Factory and Arrow are buying rights to old (‘60s through ‘00s) films that were shot on 35mm. They re-scan and remaster for UHD 4K and then straight to physical disc. That’s a cheap production pipeline with modern tech.

        I’ve been having a blast re-visiting films that I never saw in the theater and only know from VHS or DVD rentals. Seeing them again with fresh eyes in 4K has been really gratifying.

        That, plus new release discs keep me with more options than I have time to watch.

        • ApatheticCactus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          It’s weird watching 4k re releases of CG animated movies from the early 2000s. Some of them they re-rendered at 4k and you can see that major characters are high res, but all the background assets are not. Same with some early special effects in 4k. You can really see the rotoscoping and how some effects were done

        • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’m a huge fan of Shout Factory, and I’m at a place in my life where I can generally afford to pay for my media, so I do. I’ll have to look up Arrow.

          Voting with your wallet works both ways, and while most of the payment will be eaten by corporate interests at least it signals “I want more of this sort of thing”.

          My comment was mainly meant as a response to the statement regarding later seasons of Always Sunny simply not being available to purchase physically. In situations like that, I see no reasonable objection to raising the sails.

  • ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    8 months ago

    Casual reminder, Sony and Intel tried to tether Blu-ray discs to SGX DRM, which was killed just a few years after they introduced the standard, rendering all of your SGX DRM Blu-rays unplayable on PC. They disabled it so quickly, because people could use Intel SGX DRM for remote code execution in your machine, below the operating system and kernel level.

    Also, if you have one of the CPUs which still has SGX DRM, congratulations, you have a hardware Trojan! Digital restrictions management is a cancer because look at what it does in reality, vs. what they say. Who came up with this?

    • SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I keep bards and othersuch minstrels in the back yard (don’t worry, they’re fenced in) and have them play for me whenever I clap my hands. I can clap them off too

  • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    8 months ago

    Luckily I saved all of my blu-rays. And, bonus: they’re all good movies from before Disney went to shit

  • Albbi@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 months ago

    No, I ain’t going back to VHS. The quality was horrible. I don’t want to fiddle the with tracking.

    The best thing about it was that you could easily record what was on the TV.