• 0 Posts
  • 31 Comments
Joined 1 month ago
cake
Cake day: December 4th, 2025

help-circle
  • It is not built to transfer solar power from Nevada to Minnesota

    This exists and is longer than that. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rio_Madeira_HVDC_system

    Everything works better when you have baseline nuclear power

    Nope. Baseline isn’t helpful when you’re dealing with dispatchable generation, I already mentioned this.

    Remember that batteries need to be replaced often and they are very much not green.

    Nope. I already mentioned that silicon ion is capable of thousands of charge cycles.

    they are very much not green.

    Nope. Not when you’re comparing it to the amount of concrete in a nuclear plant.

    Like every other pro-nuclear person it’s all about feels with you. I’ve given you plenty of evidence, which you’ve rejected much like a cultist would do. I see no point continuing to discuss this with someone who has made an emotional decision to support nuclear in the face of all the evidence.











  • I don’t think you can win the economic argument, everything I’ve seen suggests nuclear is far more expensive and it’s not getting cheaper, whereas renewables are but if you’ve got sources, by all means let’s see them.

    Sodium batteries don’t require a way larger footprint, it’s true they’re not quite as energy dense but they’re being used in EVs in China, there’s a little reduction in range for the same size pack but they’re way better in extreme cold and heat so you’re not drawing as much power to condition the battery.

    If we’re talking 10-15 years from now, when a new nuclear plant would come online, there’s going to be a lot of EV batteries around. Maybe they get recycled but that seems a waste when they’ve only lost a little capacity. I guess we’ll see.


  • Nuclear is way more expensive than renewables, it’s not public appetite, it’s that it’s impossible to get funding if you can’t get a government to cover the cost. Another reason lenders are jumpy is that nuclear frequently goes way over budget and takes longer than initially estimated.

    By the way, last I checked SMRs don’t exist in any meaningful capacity.

    Sodium ion batteries are already on the market, they’re much cheaper than lithium, work across a far wider range of temps, they don’t catch fire, don’t lose capacity over many charge cycles, and sodium is cheap and abundant. New nuclear takes at least 10 years to build, typically longer. By then sodium batteries will be everywhere, as well as repurposed batteries from older EVs.

    What’s the argument for new nuclear? Make it make sense.