• 15 Posts
  • 395 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: March 19th, 2024

help-circle



  • Yeah I’m aware of food communities in general, I was just wondering if there was one just for recipes. But looking at the posts there it does seem fairly recipe-centric. Thanks!

    Edit: Although I was envisioning that’s mostly people sharing links to recipe blogs unless it’s a recipe they’re typing out themselves on lemmy. When I was using “conventional”/proprietary/centralised/however you want to term it social media I followed some accounts that were basically “recipe aggregators” sharing links to various recipes they found and liked, and was hoping for something similar. That content doesn’t seem to be on !cooking@lemmy.world. But still a nice community, I’ve subscribed to see more cooking content.



  • Yeah but in the past few months ive consistently found Swedish Mullvad servers to work (occasionally blocked but if you refresh the page it’s unblocked) whereas the Swiss servers, which I used to use, have been fully blocked for quite a while. I’m sure it’ll change in due time but for now that’s what’s been working. And I have found this for all the Swedish servers I’ve tried and all the Swiss servers I’ve tried. Only tried Mullvad servers as that’s the VPN I use.










  • Also, you can use a burner email and vpn if you want to add an extra layer of obfuscation in there for privacy.

    It’s still all tied to one account. They could say, for instance, the same person searched for “beans”, “onions”, and “rice”, as opposed to not being tied to an account where those 3 searches could have come from 3 different people. Of course, a search engine like DDG is only promising to not track you to try figure out if those 3 searches came from the same person, but various anti-fingerprinting measures could make it infeasible for DDG to do that. For a paid search engine, you’d have to pay for a new account per search if you didn’t want it tied to any other searches, if you don’t trust that Kagi isn’t logging searches (which you shouldn’t, because you shouldn’t rely on trust for any threat model).

    I really hope I don’t come off as a shill for them. It’s one of the few companies I actually really like.

    Don’t worry, I get where you’re coming from and I most certainly think some people have a use-case for it.





  • You cut off my sentence. Here’s the full quote.

    Their original comment absolutely did not imply they thought that it was only MAGAheads who were ok with Israel killing USAmericans, on the same level that you implied they thought that.

    Whether or not there was an implication at all is subjective. I don’t think that criticism of one party should be understood to be at the exclusion of another party, but whether or not that implication is there at all is up to you. I think making those sorts of inferences makes it very difficult to have any discussion about politics when criticising some group is meant as condoning another group; in that case any political statement would have to be very long to list all the groups it applies to.

    But I didn’t say that it wasn’t implied at all; I said it wasn’t implied at the same level. Your reply to the original comment would make no sense if you didn’t believe that they only thought MAGA supporters were ok with Israel killing USAmericans. There’s far more ambiguity in the original comment, and I don’t believe it automatically lends itself to your interpretation (which was proven wrong by that commenter saying they don’t believe such a thing), but in any case it is absolutely not the same level of implication as your comment.