With everything that’s happening there, I was wondering if it was possible. Obviously their size is massive, but I’m sure there’s a ton of duplicated stuff. Also some things are more important to preserve than others, and some things are preserved elsewhere (Anna’s Archive, Libgen, and Z-Lib come to mind that could preserve books if the IA disappeared).

But how could things get archived from the IA (assuming it’s possible) on both a personal level (aka I want to grab a copy of that wayback snapshot) and on a more wide scale community level? Are there people already working on it? If not, what would be the best theoretical way to get started?

And what are the most important things in your opinion that should be prioritized if the IA was about to disappear and we only had so much time and storage to utilize?

  • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 month ago

    I think that something like the internet archive – where the body of data is too large and important to store in one place – is where using a federated framework similar to Lemmy might make a lot of sense. What’s more, there are many different organisations which have the incentive to archive their own little slice of the internet (but not those of others), and a federated model would help in linking these up into one easily navigable, and inherently crowd-funded, whole.

      • JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        Forgive me because I’m not very familiar with the technology, but 99 petabytes (estimated size of the Internet Archive) seems like a little much for even a large network of home computers.

        Don’t get me wrong, decentralizing would be great, but I just don’t understand how it would be done at this level, especially when, in the grand scheme of things, I don’t think there’s a whole lot of people who would pitch in.

        • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          27 days ago

          Each person doesn’t need to host everything.

          The Internet archive already has torrents that get automatically created, you can right now go and download/seed torrents for some items and you are immediately doing your part in decentralizing the Internet archive.

    • twei@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think it’s actually about 150 PB of data that’s then also georedundantly stored in the US and Netherlands. That sounds like a lot, but I think it would be possible to distribute that amount of data

  • davel@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    As others have and will say, it’s an enormous body of content. And this has sparked a shower thought.

    What about not trying to be a full, perfect backup, but instead a “best effort”/“better than no backup at all” shoestring budget backup? What about triage backup? What about stripped-down markup? What about lossy text compression?

  • ganymede@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    its BIG. could be great to see some different teams tackle different issues.

    for example a transcode team to tag and convert different media to the latest efficient formats might save alot of space.

    and eg. voice-only recordings could be suitably encoded vs music etc

    also some methods for diffing snapshots, or some kind of compromise on snapshots storage with minimal changes? not ideal but might be enough to get across the line maybe?

    re. the “most important”, aside from specific items or archives, imo a crucial role might be text-only snapshots of most of the web. would help increase accountability amongst modern media outlets, journalists etc