Something is wrong with this split-screen picture. On one side, former president Donald Trump rants about mass deportations and claims to have stopped “wars with France,” after being described by his longest-serving White House chief of staff as a literal fascist. On the other side, commentators debate whether Vice President Kamala Harris performed well enough at a CNN town hall to “close the deal.”

Let’s review: First, Harris was criticized for not doing enough interviews — so she did multiple interviews, including with nontraditional media. She was criticized for not doing hostile interviews — so she went toe to toe with Bret Baier of Fox News. She was criticized as being comfortable only at scripted rallies — so she did unscripted events, such as the town hall on Wednesday. Along the way, she wiped the floor with Trump during their one televised debate.

Trump, meanwhile, stands before his MAGA crowds and spews nonstop lies, ominous threats, impossible promises and utter gibberish. His rhetoric is dismissed, or looked past, without first being interrogated.

  • b_n@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    She has been talking about a different way of doing things though, I got the feeling she talked about many policies in the debate that people have ignored.

    Non American here, but it really feels like there is nothing she can do to shake the non-trump thing. Lemmy is full of “Trump bad”, but I’m missing the “Kamala good”. Its as though no one wants to say it, and it feels like it always comes back to Israel. That is understandable too, however she is not a one policy candidate, however it feels like that is how its reduced.

    Honestly I get the feeling that its either:

    1. People being very opposed to one policy enough that its blinding them
    2. Literal trolls trying to make enough noise to make it a trump vs. Non-trump to disenfranchise the voters

    I want to see the “Kamala stands good on policy X” posts here. They should exist but where are they?

    No I dont condone the Israel shit, but there has to be more to it. That’s too simple.

    • Talisker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Is she?

      She just got on national TV and refused to support trans rights. Democrats ran to the right of fascists on militarizing the border. She is pro imperialism. She isn’t committed to climate change. She’s not going to meaningfully redistribute wealth. Looking at how desperate Americans are right now do you really think that coming out with a plan to raise the top marginal tax rate from 30 to 35 percent or whatever is some massive rallying cry that’s going to make people re-evaluate their worldviews? She’s not even that strong on abortion rights.

    • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It’s not just “one policy” though. That kind of reduces it to a bloodless difference of opinion or something. We’re not haggling over tax rates or something, this is a literal, ongoing genocide. If Kamala is wrong on genocide, she can’t be “good”, no matter what other policy positions she has.

      • b_n@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Sure. I totally understand that, but the stakes are different during an election in a system which at this very moment cannot and will not change. It serves to disenfranchise people.

        You can and should campaign about this issue. At the same time, the stakes at present are not about whether the US will exit Israel or not. No amount of disapproval will change that fact, so why not focus on the things that will change, and come back to this later?