http://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/chew

Alt text

There was a fairly intricate debate on an early version of this posted to bluesky, the contention being over whether OR was sufficient. I think the ORs have it, but XOR is a funnier word, so there.

Bonus panel

Bonus panel

  • thebosz@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    In the English language “or” is equivalent to the Boolean “xor”. The English equivalent to the Boolean “or” is “and/or”.

    • davidgro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 months ago

      Only sometimes. English is very much not so consistent.

      Example: If I’m asked “Do you want fries with that? Or a shake?” It’s perfectly reasonable* for me to respond with “Both please.”

      (*Linguistically, not so reasonable for my health.)

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Yeah in this instance “yes” would cover both and if you want to answer with either specific then you name them

          “fries, thanks, no shake”

          “a shake please, yes”

          Those all seems clear to me

          Edit although if you just answer “yes” the cashier should prolly confirm “both?”, if he’s a pro.

    • Fushuan [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      But even logically it is an and. He came to do both, the logic statement won’t comply until he has done both, nowhere there is he saying that he is going to do both at the same time, only that his intention, by the end, is to have done both.

      If he fulfills his intentions, he will have chewed bubblegum and kicked ass by the time he leaves, but that’s again up for interpretation because he didn’t specify if he’s capable for either or any kind of timeframe.

      …I did take a course on what’s basically advanced logic in 4th year of CS. I believe we proved up until exponentials via logic proofs, based on some basic axioms like 1+1 and number ordering.

      It’s fun to logically prove that 2 + 3 = 5 from the basic symbols 1 and +.

  • nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    i came here to chew bubblegum and kick ass.

    this is the correct order of intended actions if this is meant as a citation.

    • taco@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Not if they’re citing Duke Nukem, which is probably more well known for the phrase at this point than They Live.

      • nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I admit I had to look it up, but Duke Nukem, in a horrible misquote/steal said: “It’s time to kick ass and chew bubblegum. And I’m all out of gum.” So not only did he get the order of actions wrong, but messed with the opening as well :D

        Also I thought Duke Nukem never released!!

          • nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            as per your link:

            Origin While many believe the quote originated from the video game Duke Nukem 3D, it actually comes from the 1988 movie

            so I guess you’ll supply more evidence.

            [or] what are you waiting for? Christmas?

            • taco@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              3 months ago

              I know and never debated the origin of the phrase. I was providing evidence that the order used in the comic is well known itself and not a misquote as indicated by your initial comment.