So I see this game. Let me sum up what I actually see:

  • Reviews are mixed: not a great start
  • Requires 3rd-party account: fuck that
  • 60 euros base game: expensive, especially when the game has mixed reviews
  • 175 euros DLC’s: are you fucking kidding me? On top of 60 euros for the base game, there’s another 175 fees for content?
  • purchasable CoD points: so pay to win?

And they don’t understand why people pirate, run away from AAA games and go for indie games instead.

This is just a random example. I’ve quit playing COD after Modern Warfare.

To end this positively: I recently started playing Necesse which is really nice, and I started playing an old time favorite again after a long time: World of Goo. Both worth my money :)

  • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Bro the CoD ship sailed years ago. They just don’t innovate and release the same shit year after year. Buy something else. I’d recommend Factorio.

      • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I had an intermediary of Minecraft and really gravitated towards the automation, I then saw Factorio on YouTube and was like damn this looks sick. I’m a software developer so it tracks that I like to solve problems.

        Recently downloaded Satisfactory though to give that a try.

        I also believe I aged out of FPS games as I was pretty above average all my life but just don’t have the time nor inclination to keep grinding anymore to stay really good at them. All about solo games now and just vibin.

        • brognak@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 month ago

          Only because I had to explain the differences recently and it’s top of mind:

          Satisfactory - Main goal is efficient usage of limited amount of throughput. Resource nodes are static, and efficiency is the name of the game. My favorites usually end up a spaghetti mess of belts, everything being fed the correct amount of inputs and all outputs being accounted for.

          Factorio - Main goal is THE FACTORY MUST GROW. Your factory need more input to run 100%? You could figure out how to optimize everything that comes before it, orrrr just slam more out. Resources are randomly generated, and while you can exhaust deposits, there’s always more on the horizon. Explore. Expand. Exterminate. ENLARGE FACTORY. Usually ends up in a beautiful mess of a factory with bots zipping around, and the power flickers every now and then when the biters think they are more powerful that explosives/concentrated beams of light.

  • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s CoD. You’re asking why people drink coke if you don’t like coke.

    Also, steam FPS reviews are full of people on full tilt. Use better review sources.

        • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Im not referring to any particular cod game. Im referring to the whole series. Its triple A garbage that is churned out like pop music and its boring. Every new game is a rehash of a previous one with no innovation and more monetization.

          Its not a review of the game. Its an opinion about the capitalist nature of the companies who make these games and how shit it is.

          • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yeah it was a joke man. CoD is exactly as you described but it’s irrelevant to the people playing it.

            Sports fans go and watch the same team play similar games dozens of times over many many seasons. That’s what CoD is to its fans (FIFA, NFL, etc., similarly).

            Both are not for me, but I get why other people like it.

            • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Ahh, sorry im so dumb sometimes. I think i spent too long on reddit in the before times and see any text as starting a fight :p

  • dan1101@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I understand the single player campaigns are somewhat fun. I’ve had Black Ops on my Steam wishlist for years and it has never been on a decent sale.

    • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t like the black ops series. The modern warfare games had a really nice single-player, or at least the first 2 (I haven’t played any cod after that, they already broke it).

    • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s why I pirate. Even 10 bucks is too much money for these companies exploiting their customers. The only “downside” is no multiplayer. But I only care about single-player anyway :)

  • SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I want a Call of Doody game where you’re running around downtown of a major city looking for a public bathroom while prairie dogging a big old shit kind of like Far Cry 2’s malaria mechanic.

    • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      With CoD BO3 extensive ability to be modded and workshop support, it could be theoretically possible.

    • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I want to see a game where you have to pay rent on a server and you need to spend all of your time working to make in game currency to pay the rent otherwise you’re kicked out. But when you’re sick and can’t play, they will kick you out anyways. And the rent keeps getting up, but the monthly income does not. And when you need customer support they put you on a waiting list and when it’s your turn they say “wrong department, we’re putting you on another waiting list” so you will never get the mental help you need. Yeah, I would definitely play that game, I know I’m good at it.

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I haven‘t encountered a Steam game that doesn‘t run on Linux so far. They very likely exist but anti cheat, third party account requirements, or an online connection while playing don‘t have anything to do with it as far as my games go. Same goes for GOG, Amazon Games and Epic Games on Heroic launcher. It just works as far as I can tell.

      • Klajan@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        You are lucky then. If you play lots of multiplayer games you are bound to encounter one that doesn’t work.

        Most modern Call of Duty and Battlefield games do not work for example.

        According to areweanticheatyet.com only 40% of Games with Anti cheat work on Linux…

        • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          It would never occur to me to install CoD or Battlefield in the year 2025. So yeah, Guess I am lucky for having standards. Hopefully more people will realize there are other fantastic multiplayer games out there that run on a Steamdeck for example.

            • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Wtf with what reason xD The whole AI integration into basic things supposed to do basic things is stupidness of a dystopian degree. A bed with AI? It’s just a mattress. Why, just why. An AC just needs to cool to a certain temp. Why does it need AI, to get a relationship with it? What’s next, tables with AI?

      • melroy@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 month ago

        Not fully true. Yes a lot of games run on Windows… But a lot of them also run on Linux, in some cases even Native, in other cases using Wine/Proton from Valve. See: https://www.protondb.com/

        A lot of online pvp games do work under Linux as well. But then again… AAA games are the most problematic… because they just stuck, and get ignored by the devs/publishers. I’m looking at you EA!

    • TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 month ago

      To be fair that icon doesn’t mean much of anything cuz you can just force compatibility in Linux and use proton, you just gotta manually do that in properties.

      This is probably windows only because of kernel level anticheat though so it probably still holds up.

  • ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    Thanks to modern video games being barely functional slop most of the time, I got into emulation. All these games work beautifully and I have a massive catalogue of high quality games, with creative contents that would not get made anymore today.

  • Kyden Fumofly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I played Tekken 3 in PSX when i was a kid. One CD had everything, many modes, many characters, ton of fun.

    Ffw to 2 years ago, i think to play with a friend Tekken again, searching in Steam Tekken only to see that it has 24 DLCs, many of them that are fighters (game has 16 unlockable characters, and 14 more being paid DLC)…

    • OrgunDonor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think that fighting games are in a much better place with the season passes(character DLC) than previously.

      They are a much more long term game, with better balance patches and additions through mechanics to the game. Tekken 7 for example was supported for 7 years and you can jump in with just the base game. This also applies to other games like Street Fighter 5 and 6, Guilty Gear Strive and so on.

      Where as if you go back to Street fighter 4 as an example, The support was limited and then they added more with a new game, Super Street Fighter 4, which then got replaced with Ultra Street Fighter 4, and you could not play someone who had Super if you only had Ultra which sucked for the online community.

      I do think there is a lot of issues with where Fighting Games are going, but that is more an industry thing. Like battle passes, avatar clothes and other shit as micro transactions.

      • Kyden Fumofly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Well, maybe you are right. But still it feels wrong putting fighters that exist since 1995+ as paid DLC content (or almost half of your fighters are paid locked). Also if you want the whole package it costs you almost double money. I don’t need support, i need a fine product from day one that has everything like BG3, E33, and many indie games. They just want to make games like a service and not products.

        • OrgunDonor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          While you may not need support for the game. The games would not do as well as they do without it. They are predominantly an online multiplayer game. I am no the biggest Tekken fan, but I am a pretty big fan of Street Fighter, I have over 1000 hours on SF6. If it didnt have the good online multiplayer, and just had just had the offline and single player stuff, I would have something like 100 hours maybe and would have moved on to other games.

          And that makes a big difference, to how much I am willing to buy into both characters and costumes, and also the next game.

          Tekken 8 and SF6 still have good(for fighting games) single player stuff, but you are looking at a simple story and some arcade modes. SF6 has a bit more of a single player RPG almost for its single player, and I have managed to sink around 80 hours into that, they add more with each new character and I believe it is free.

          And to go back to Tekken, Tekken 3 had 22 characters, While Tekken 7 had 36, which then increases to 51 if you add in the addition characters, Tekken 8 currently has ~40 with more being added. They are fine games, with all the content that you want(mostly) in the base game, but the biggest difference between Tekken 3 and Tekken 7 or 8 is it isnt being replaced in a couple years by a new full priced game, it is getting patches and support, additional mechanics and moves, new characters. And the online/competitive community can thrive.

          • Kyden Fumofly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            I don’t know. I prefer to unlock characters through playing the game, not with my wallet.

            Also you can have 2 different games with 25 fighters each every 4 years, versus having 1 game with 50 fighters for 7 years with the same money as 2 games. I just prefer the 1st option.

            Just support the game for 2-3 years and make a better one after. If you need money for the support put DLC with soundtracks and artwork.

  • taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Marketing weirdly effective, for one. They pump a large portion of their budgets into hype and they make just enough back to keep going. It’s like the same people who watch an ad for a fast food place and go even though it’s never as advertised.

    And most isn’t direct marketing. They very much pay influencers to buy this slop and worse. You pay a half million to a guy to make something look popular and it becomes popular. It’s very annoying.

  • VoxBunn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m all for hating on CoD, but the DLC “content” is skins and minor cosmetics, it really doesn’t add anything to the game and isn’t necessary at all. Also the CoD Points are for cosmetics as well. There’s a lot of shitty things you can and should say about Vanguard, but it is not pay to win.

    • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Fair enough, at least we have to give them that. But that means it’s a platform for people to show off they have more money than others and gladly show they wasted it on useless digital nonsense. Not the audience I’d like to play games with.

  • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    Why would I buy this?

    I can only think of one reason, because it’s the game your friends are playing.

    You have two choices; buy the shitty game with the understanding that the game itself is not what matters but the time spent playing with your friends. Or, don’t buy the game and spend the next few weeks, or months, not playing with your friends and hope they grow bored of the game soon.