Last Tuesday, as the strongest Atlantic storm in 90 years slammed the western coast of Jamaica with 185-mph winds, Bill Gates was downplaying climate change.
The billionaire does not appear to have publicly addressed the disaster in Jamaica, which extended throughout the Caribbean, with Melissa having killed dozens across Cuba, Haiti, the Bahamas, and the Dominican Republic. And his overall point, frankly, does not hold up to scrutiny.
Gates isn’t alone; climate change has slipped down the world’s priority list in the past few years—and it shows. Governments and corporations are shelving emissions goals, budgets are being redirected from climate initiatives to warfare, the media is pivoting away from climate journalism, and even activists are urging a softer, more “hopeful” tone. It all signals a vibe shift in how we talk about climate change, reframing it from the existential risk it actually poses to a less urgent, peripheral issue—even as the floodwaters reach our front doors.
Respectfully, Bill Gates is complicit in genocide and should be investigated for his connections with Epstein.
isnt thats why hes doing “charities” for africans, to reinvent his image because of that, the timing is more than a coincidence, although start way before epstein got on the news, but he probably knew he would be connected to him in the media sooner or later.
I think he and Melinda have been pouring money into charities since he left Microsoft. They have saved countless lives with malaria assistance alone.
i dont doubt that, but other than melinida, he likely had an ulterior motive.
Fact Check: List of claims about Bill Gates includes falsities
Not to defend the guy but there are enough real skeletons in his closet. We don’t need to spread misinformation.
Respectfuly, if you want to fact check someone atleast say what fact you are checking. Although perhaps I could have been more clear.
For the record, Bill Gates is complicit in the genocide in Gaza
- https://timschwab.substack.com/p/is-philanthropy-profiting-from-genocide
- https://www.mintpressnews.com/microsoft-israel-surveillance-azure-idf-gaza-genocide/290534/
- https://www.commondreams.org/views/2021/11/11/bill-gates-should-know-better-how-israeli-occupation-ravages-environment-palestine
And he has connections with Epstein who on top of the whole child rape side gig was very successful at laundering money to send to Israel.
- https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-09-27/epstein-files-six-pages-released/105823750
- https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/house-democrats-release-partial-epstein-records-referencing-musk-gates-and-prince-andrew
- https://pagesix.com/2025/04/15/celebrity-news/melinda-gates-addresses-ex-bills-deeply-disturbing-jeffrey-epstein-link/
For the record, Bill Gates is complicit in the genocide in Gaza
https://timschwab.substack.com/p/is-philanthropy-profiting-from-genocide https://www.mintpressnews.com/microsoft-israel-surveillance-azure-idf-gaza-genocide/290534/For both of these to support your argument, you must be saying that owning stock in a company that benefits from business or weapons that benefit Israel makes the stockholder “complicit in the genocide in Gaza”. If you’re saying that than probably about 60% of Americans would be “complicit in the genocide in Gaza” as they have stock including index total market funds or S&P 500 funds which have fractions of shares in many of those same companies.
That seems like an overly broad definition to me, but if that is your definition, then your claim is true.
https://www.commondreams.org/views/2021/11/11/bill-gates-should-know-better-how-israeli-occupation-ravages-environment-palestineThis one just talks about Gates being involved with Israel on climate change actions without any Gates involvement in Gaza. So have to assume your position is that being involved with Israel on issues affecting all of us globally is also an endorsement of genocide. That too, seems like an extreme position.
Is this logic that someone specifically investing vs having a retirement fund or similar is the same thing?
Is this logic that someone specifically investing vs having a retirement fund or similar is the same thing?
You’d have to ask @ CubitOom@infosec.pub. My guess is they would consider both “complicit in genocide in Gaza” with their broad definition.
Please stop with all your critical thinking. /s
Melinda shit canned his ass for good reasons.
deleted by creator
Irrespectfully most tech moguls need to shut the fuck up, especially about shit that has nothing to do with tech
he was always known to be ruthless during his ceo days, his current image is trying to reinvent, and also to soften the blow of him being associated with epstein.
This does have to do with tech because the firm he founded is knee deep in the AI bullshit which is burning energy at an incredible rate.
You do know people can learn new things. Especially people with tons of money and time. You should try sometime, it’s fun!
I know people in the tech field can be very biased towards tech bullshit, and they tend to model everything through the cold vision of their industry.
Ok but define “tech” at this point. That made sense in 2000, maybe 2010, it’s… ubiquitous now
No respect needed.
All due can be 0
He can blather as mich as he wants, stop giving the douche air time or column inches ffs.
I wish someone could just start removing problems for us.
Ladies and gentlemen and others, this is what they call “the good billionaire”!
High-school dropout nepo-baby Bill Gates? That one?
The guy that stole IBMs UI setup and made Windows?
Xerox’s
TBF, he dropped out of Harvard.
Fuck Bill. Let’s throw him in the volcano with the other elites
I LIKE THIS IDEA
That’s wasteful. Pit them against each other in death matches.
We WILL have the Zuck vs Elon match after all
on top of a volcano. loser goes in. that would make Hephaestus happy
He should only take advice from Balmer. And to be clear, the cocaine Balmer.
Instructions unclear: drowning in an abundance of photographical developer
Release the Epstein files and all will be revealed
Don’t ask whether it’s distraction from Epstein list, ask whether everything bad is distraction from climate change and wealth inequality.
its mostly distraction from epstein, suddenly he started to “act out” when more attention was given to epstein files as of recently. it also make sense why hes doing charities, beside tax evasion/monely laundering, he using the goodwill image, to put himself in a positive light.
Gates often gets a pass because he gives away a lot of money and “advocates” for a wealth tax. But he’s still a billionaire and still hoards more resources and power than any single person could ethically possess.
Not really what the article is about
I remember when he did an AMA on Reddit and every comment about his Epstein connection was instantly buried.
i remember that to, i questioned about his charities being used a way to evade tax, of course the AMA sub would remove it. He want adulations about him giving “christmas gifts” on reddit, im guessing its one of the reasons he stopped going on reddit, like the finebros, they wanted adorations instead was driven off to facebook for being shills of YT. currently Sinese, gary has been on REDDIT frequently, he appeared right before the election, hmm suspicious, virtue signalling for vets. plus he gave a excuse to why he left acting(i wanna guess is that his time im HW wouldve come to end with him being outwardly republican now, if he became vitrolitic, as the other Rs actors, and not because of his SON).
deleted by creator
Gates does not need to “shut up”. He needs to testify as to what his relationship is with Epstein.
Quiet, you fool! Don’t antagonize him. You think all that Windows AI is out there for our benefit? Oh no, it’s there for Bill to press the button and blue screen the world. And don’t tell me Linux users are safe; that’s what the assassination squads are for.
