• bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        Is resume just client/server support for byte serving requests? Pretty sure that was around with HTTP/1.1 in the late 90s, but my memory of it was client support in Netscape for downloads wasn’t really there, so most people probably never used it.

        • waggz@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          idk the technical specifics on it but standards were mostly loosely followed suggestions back then. i still run in to issues today with some downloads not even knowing the total size. i just remember being on dial up and hoping if i let it go all night i wouldn’t have to start anew in the morning.

    • tauisgod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      14 days ago

      GetRight ftw. I just googled it and it’s still a thing.

      Now, burning CDs at 2x speed on windows 98 was a chore. Converting a whole disc with of mp3’s and not breathing on your computer for 40 minutes so it didn’t freeze and ruin an expensive CDR sucked.

    • ButtDrugs@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      14 days ago

      I came to the comments hoping someone posted this. Its a classic and many young’ins will never know the pain.

  • Lemminary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    14 days ago

    Good ol’ days when I used to leave the computer on downloading 1 GB of software overnight, and I would pray to the gods in the morning that it hadn’t aborted halfway through.

  • DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    15 days ago

    Poor guy is probably still waiting for cc32e47.exe to finish downloading. Should be done in the next ten years or so.

    • tetris11@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 days ago

      Netscape was bloatware, even by today’s standards. Though to be fair, nothing back then was standard so you might as well pack all the libraries in one big ole sloppy zip

  • jaybone@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Don’t most torrent clients do these types of estimates? (Of course you can resume a torrent though.)

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 days ago

      Yeah, but the estimates are not as terrible. You have to average the download speed over some time period, so that the estimate doesn’t shoot towards infinity when the download speed falters for a moment.

      Not awfully complex to implement, but for whatever reason Microsoft didn’t bother for quite while, even after they already had a reputation for terrible estimates.

      • jaybone@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 days ago

        Using the Transmission torrent client, I’ve seen the estimates go into years.

  • voodooattack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    14 days ago

    Ahh, FlashGet, you used to be a beautiful thing. At least before they turned it into an adware shitfest. Glad I migrated off Windows before then.

  • tramdan.uk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    15 days ago

    When you came back in the room it wouldn’t be saying 3 minutes or 52 years. It would be saying ‘are you sure you want to move file xxxxx.xxx’ and it would have been saying that since you left the room.

  • FalschgeldFurkan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    14 days ago

    Fun fact: Even if the estimation were correct, you wouldn’t have had to wait 34yrs anyways since it didn’t took that long to get better network speed