Everyone have their own “hot takes” that either work as a valid opinion, or ragebait for drama. Personally, I have one that if I’m saying it to you all, maybe considered to be “too serious😈🤡”. The hot takes itself is . . .

God Never forbid man to do their [hobbies/fun], (toxic) society did

How about yours? I like to hear alongside the reason why ;)

(Edit: I’m aware that some takes may kinda too far and too deep, so let’s keep it casual)

  • cloudless@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    I can tell you my hot takes that I am NOT too scared to say online:

    I don’t mind game key cards.

    I prefer iPhone over Android.

    I think LLM is useful.

    I still visit Reddit (as read-only).

  • queerlilhayseed@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    Not “too scared to say online” but… I think it’s less a question of if we’ll ever develop a sentient AI, and more a question of whether we’ll recognize them as sentient before or after the war of independence. To be clear, I don’t think we’re there yet, but assuming we don’t wipe ourselves out first, I think it’s inevitable in the long run.

  • unmagical@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Without getting too specific: there are some completely harmless kinks between consenting adults that I still want to kink shame.

    • Perspectivist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      Speaking of kinks: wanting to hurt people’s feelings for no other reason than to your own enjoyment would be labeled as sadism.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      I feel like kinks ought to be private anyway. Sharing them feels intimate in a way that is a violation of shared civil spaces. What people do in private doesn’t bother me in the slightest, but if your kink requires making me uncomfortable by telling me what you’re into, I have every right to decline to be a part of your sexual gratification.

      To be clear, I’m not talking about LGBTQ+ communities or people who like to wear revealing clothing. That’s not a kink. But if you’re dressed like a puppy and being led around on a leash with a visible erection, then you should be a little bit ashamed for involving me without my consent. There are private spaces for private conversations and private activities. I should be able to ride the bus without getting jizzed on by a masturbating homeless man.

  • BakerBagel@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    All changes to MLB post integration were bad. Wearing black/navy jerseys during a day game in 95F heat in Atlanta or Cincinnati? Bad. The designated hitter? Bad. The New York Mets? Bad

  • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    The Imperial system is easier to use for every day things. Metric is good for science and engineering, when precision and conversions are important, but for things like estimating, baking, driving, and weather, Imperial units are functionally more useful.

    • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Awesome that this is the one that has more downvotes than upvotes (at the moment from my instance: 2/4)

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        It’s my go-to controversial opinion when I want to practice arguing against a consensus. Most people who have an opinion on the matter think that they are being rational about it, but in my experience people have strong emotional responses to feet and inches because of the psychological trauma of math tests in primary school.

        You think about feet and miles, and you probably think of a worksheet with word problems, with Henry and Jessica travelling on two trains going in different directions. Or maybe your mind goes to a detailed chart you have on a refrigerator magnet for how many pints of milk you need to buy for 16 guests if 60% of them put two tablespoons in their coffee every day for a three day weekend. You’re probably angry just reading that sentence, and I know it raised my blood pressure writing it. You don’t actually need to do that math, you just buy a gallon of milk and run to the store if you need more. It’s not even really easier if it’s liters of milk and 35 mL per coffee.

        And that’s for people who live in the USA. I’ve also found that people outside of the US resent Americans for using such an objectively inferior system. It reinforces the perception of an arrogant, impetuous, lazy and selfish nation of obliviously uneducated consumers forcing the rest of the world to accommodate our obstinate fat-ass ignorance.

        So either way, people who have an opinion probably have strong emotional reactions to that opinion being challenged.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Base 12 and base 16 are superior to base 10 for use without measuring tools. The only reason we use base 10 is that we have 10 fingers.

        If metric were objectively superior, then we’d all be using metric time as well. But it’s easier to divide hours and minutes into halves and quarters in a base 60 system.

        • DibbleDabble@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I don’t understand the “easier to use without measuring tools” part. Can you explain it a bit more?

          • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Sure, so Imperial units aren’t like one set of cohesive measurements, they are based on units of measure that can be easily estimated without a measuring tool. A foot is about the length of a foot. A cup is a cup. A mile is a thousand paces. 0 degrees Fahrenheit was the coldest outside temperature in the place where Fahrenheit lived, and 90 was the temp of a human body.

            All of these measurements were standardized and adjusted for accuracy and precision when standards were determined, but the idea was that people didn’t need to have a set of calibrated instruments with accurate measurements marked on them in order to use them. Most people didn’t carry rulers and graduated cylinders around, and even though those things are widely available now, you still probably don’t carry them with you. They are in your house, in a drawer, waiting to be used only when certainty is required.

            And even the conversions are meant to be functional without tools. When they standardized the length of a foot and an inch, it could have easily been adjusted to be 10 inches to a foot. 12 was used because it is easier to divide 12 without accurate markings. If you have a string that is 12 inches, fold it in half to get 6 inches, fold it again to get three inches. Or fold it in thirds (three equal lengths) and you have four inches. Fold that in half twice over again and you have an inch. Likewise, a gallon is 16 cups, because 16 can be divide in half 4 times to get a cup. Conversion by division means you don’t need to have as many different tools. A pound of sand and a balance can be used to find an ounce of sand without any additional tools, and you could probably get pretty close without the balance.

            It is rarely important to be able to convert inches to miles. The ratio between them is arbitrary, because they are meant to measure vastly different things. Both are length, but an inch is the ground covered by a worm in a single contraction, and a mile is the ground covered by an army after a thousand paces. It’s dead simple to convert milimeters to kilometers, but how often do you actually need to do that accurately?

            100 degree F is very hot outside. 0 degrees is very cold. Upper third is beach weather, be careful about overheating. Lower third, might snow, be careful about freezing to death. Water boils over a fire, and that’s about as accurate as you need to be most days. Modern digital tools and electronics have simplified all of these processes. The only time people actually need to use Imperial conversion rates is in school when you learn (and are tested on) how many feet are in a mile or how many BTUs it takes to raise the temperature of half a cup of water by 7 degrees. Of course that’s going to suck because it’s like mining for coal with a garden trowel. That’s not what it’s meant for. But you also wouldn’t use a backhoe to plant petunias, either.

            I grew up using both Imperial and metric. Both have their uses, and both have pros and cons. Personally, I hate trying to describe the weather in Celsius. The differences between too hot and too cold are crammed between -20 to 40 degrees. What kind if scale is that? The difference between 38 and 43 is life threatening. Why should the boiling point of water be relevant to choosing between a sweater and a tee shirt? I don’t need to find the joules it will take to defrost 17 grams of ice on my car window. The benefits of the metric system are not relevant to my everyday existence, nor are the disadvantages of the Imperial system.

            • DibbleDabble@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              That is a very interesting take. I can’t relate to most of the advantages of imperial you mentioned since I’ve grown up with primarily metric. Exposure to a specific system for a certain period of time lets the mind just acclimate to that system (calculations inclusive), and conversion to imperial just feels like a chore to me. That being said, I can definitely see where you’re coming from.

              Thank you for this detailed answer.

              • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                Of course! You’ve hit the nail on the head, in that anyone can get used to anything if you grow up with it. Your brain wraps itself around your environment, and the language and descriptions you grow up with are the framework for your understanding of things.

                It’s like naming colors of the rainbow. The number of discrete colors you see depends on the number of discrete names your language has for those colors. Roy G Biv is just one method of delineation. Some languages don’t separate blue and green, or red and orange. We actually see millions of colors, but our brain structures categories based on the words we have to describe them.

                We use base 10 numbering, because we have five fingers on each hand. Imaging what the metric system would look like if 360 million years ago, some polydactyl mutant managed to win the evolutionary tournament of reproduction, and we all had an extra thumb on the opposite side of our hands. Baseball gloves would look super weird, and we would have a duodecimal metric system where 100 cm could be evenly divided by three or six, but not five, and a foot would be 10 inches without changing either length.

  • Lorax@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Eating animals shouldn’t be socially acceptable and people who do should be treated like someone smoking in a public space.

    • daggermoon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      The problem is it’s one of the most normal things in our culture. I’m guilty of it myself. I’d like to be vegan someday but I have other things to attend to before that’s a possibility.

    • FatVegan@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      My hot take is that meat shouldn’t at least not be substidized. Meat is comically cheap for what it is and everyone has to pay for it. I only treat myself to some fake salmon that is carrot based because it’s somehow more expensive than actual salmon. I often heard the argument that poor people would suffer because of it. If they REALLY need to eat meat then, like I don’t know, tough titty. Buy your own animal to torture.

    • remon@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      People smoking in public are treated badly? Where? Since when?

      • FridaySteve@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        In the 80s, shopping malls had ashtrays at the end of every bench. Every workplace had a cloud of cigarette smoke at every entrance that you had to walk through. It’s much much more socially unacceptable to smoke cigarettes than it used to be.

        • remon@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Both of those things are still happening? At least if the benches are outside.

          • FridaySteve@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            I’m talking about indoors. You could walk around smoking cigarettes inside the shopping mall. Nowadays most places in the world ban smoking in indoor public spaces and within whatever distance from building entrances. I don’t think there’s a shipping mall in North America that allows smoking indoors.

            • remon@ani.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Ok. I usually don’t think of indoor when I read “in public”. Obviously you can’t smoke inside a store, not even in the 80s.

              • FridaySteve@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Perhaps not in a clothing store but you sure could smoke in supermarkets in the 80s and shopping carts even had ashtrays on them.

                Edit: oops I’m being told that there were ashtrays in the fitting rooms and bathrooms in clothing stores too but as a kid my clothes were cash and carry.

  • calliope@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    I have an appropriately silly one to share that people get tended to get upset about elsewhere.

    Professional wrestling used to be interesting, but Vince McMahon destroyed it piece by piece. The “hot take” is that I have despised Vince McMahon since the early nineties, because he was an awful commentator and it’s been abundantly clear he’s human garbage for forty fucking years!

    Strangely, people get mad about that!

    • jacksilver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I mean, even though it has a wider audience it is still mostly targeted at kids/teens. I do agree though that it is a bit overrated (and surprising homogenous).

      As for the creepy part, yeah can’t argue with you on that. I think it’s gotten a bit better over the years, but it’s still hard recommending shows sometimes.

  • myrmidex@belgae.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    This Bob Vylan lyric fits nicely:

    Big dreams sat swelling in my head

    Big dreams, big boy, small bed

    Wanna share 'em all but the last time I did

    I learnt some things are better left unsaid