• AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 days ago

    I paid for a real id license when they were first available in my state, and I’ve paid for a renewal. I disagree with the surveillance society they enable but I’m also a realist who wants to travel conveniently.

    But I’ve still never gotten one. When it comes down to it, actually getting a real id license requires taking a day off work and waiting in line at the Registry …… whereas I can renew a standard license online and have a few years left on my passport

    One of the many ways RealID has been a fiasco is RMV/DMV’s not staffing up to support it

    • BanMe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’m in a backass hillbilly state but I just made an appointment at the DMV and then had to wait all of 5 minutes when I got there. But, then they tried to argue every single piece of paper I brought which involved calls to supervisors so it wound up being a 40 minute ordeal. I swear they don’t want you to actually get it.

      • khepri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        when I was like “hey can I do my REAL ID real quick now too?” to the DMV agent I was renewing my registration with, he literally laughed at me 🤣. It’s like 90% the effort of getting a full-blown passport, at least with the documentation they make you give in my state…

  • thesohoriots@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    The agency warns that even then, there is no guarantee that individuals will be cleared to cross through the security checkpoint.

    Bummer, that’s another $45 to re-check until they get it right. I’m guessing this will happen a lot.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I mean that’s obvious. Otherwise you’re just paying $45 to ignore the security checkpoint if you’re guaranteed to get through with payment.

  • myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    While this is ridiculous. The original requirement date for a real id was 2008. It has been 20 years since real id was passed. You have had 20 years to get one.

    • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      My state had extremely limited appointments for Real ID applications. Then they casually offered an “upgrade” when I went to add an endorsement in 2021 because they went to no-walk-in appointment system and suddenly had all the time in the world on their hands

    • grinde@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      My state didn’t start offering them until 2018, and our IDs are good for 5 years. Also, our DVS was a complete shitshow at the time with regular licenses taking up to 6 months to arrive, and double that for a real id. People avoided them so they wouldn’t have to renew a temporary license every 3 months.

      Realistically, people in my state have had an average of one opportunity to get a real id on renewal.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Dude it was hard enough for my wife to get a new ID (not REAL) when we moved from RI to MA.

      I do all the bills and handle all the finances. My credit was better (now we are about equal) and so all the utilities and most the credit cards are in my name. Not to mention most of them are paperless.

      At the time, I think she was also still on a cell phone plan with her siblings.

      So, like, absolutely no official-enough mail coming to our house to her name. And they need 2.

      What, exactly, is the purpose of an ID, and why does it need my SSN and two pieces of mail? How does that identify me, as a person, any more than a supporting document like an existing US Passport? If I qualified for a US Passport, why the hell do I need so much more on top of that for just a state issued ID.

      The whole thing is a scam to bully minorities and put an additional burden on traveling for low-income families. I wonder how many people are missing flights to some important and unexpected event (i.e. a funeral) because they never fly and never had a reason to get a REAL ID.

      For that matter, I’d really like to know what TSA gets out of a REAL ID that they don’t get out of a regular license, for domestic travel? They don’t care about my proof of residence, they only care that the name matches the boarding pass and the face, and isn’t Islamic or otherwise off-white.

        • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          And she did, last time we flew. Domestically. Which is absurd.

          No other real reason to make a special trip to the RMV just to upgrade the license. Certainly not to pay a fee to get it and still keep the same expiration date on her license. So not even extending it.

      • Jumbie@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        How long until they require it to vote so it shuts out a majority of the voters from participating in elections?

  • bluegreenpurplepink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    117
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Title leaves out “or passport.”

    In a push to get you to think you must have a Real ID, I’ve noticed the media constantly leaves out or minimizes the fact that a passport is sufficient to get you through an airport or any other place a Real ID is required.

    So no extra fee of you have a passport.

  • khepri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    A passport is a really good thing to have, and lasts much longer than a Real ID state license. It ends up costing like $13/yr and it opens up the whole world to you. It blows my mind that on;y 50% of US citizens ever bother getting one.

    • OldQWERTYbastard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 days ago

      Well over half of us live paycheck to paycheck and traveling is exorbitantly expensive. Especially international travel.

      It sucks being broke.

      • DempstersBox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Travel can be done cheap. Don’t go to the exorbitantly expensive shitty fake ass resort where you get food poisoning.

        Go be real, in the real world.

      • innermachine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Ding ding ding- the commenter your replying to must not be poor to think buying something you cannot use is a good idea 😂😭

    • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      It costs 165 bucks per person or almost $700 for a family of 4. Then they need $3000-$5000 to travel round trip once to a destination in Europe.

    • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      3 days ago

      Many citizens don’t leave their state. Plenty of them are hand to mouth and can’t afford groceries. Even local travel is a luxury to some, so I can understand why they might not have the desire to go through the process and pay for the passport, not to mention that many people don’t know their SSN or have their birth certificates.

      • khepri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Oh for sure, I’m not saying foreign travel or passport fees are an achievable goal for every single adult American. But we are talking here about the group of people who fly at the very least domestically. And for that, you need Real ID, which does require you to supply things like your SSN and birth certificate. So for that group specifically that we’re talking about here, the domestic flyers that already need or have Real ID, I think a passport is a logical thing to get as well if it’s in your budget.

        • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          3 days ago

          I looked it up, my understanding is US passports are currently issued with your “assigned sex at birth”, i.e. not your gender or biological sex.

          Basically, the passport isn’t showing your gender.

          • ghostlychonk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            3 days ago

            You know what I mean and it’s meant to out and punish transgender Americans for daring to live their lives without being persecuted. At best, it’s going to cause a massive headache for those whose looks no longer match their AGAB.

            • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              I don’t think so. I think if someone wants to change their gender that’s their business. It’s not something I’d want to do but calling it weird seems kind of judgy.

            • tree_frog_and_rain@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              Gender is sociology. Essentially caste and class roles.

              Sex is biology.

              Folks that like to conflate the two want gender roles to be immutable.

          • tree_frog_and_rain@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 days ago

            No, it’s showing what’s in my pants. Or was in my pants at birth if I’ve had an operation. And if my gender presentation doesn’t match someone’s expectations, it means I will potentially get detained or harassed. Or possibly even arrested depending on the country.

            So the intent is to hurt the trans community. And being all, ‘well actually’ about it being sex assigned at birth feels like a bad faith take.

            Which is why you’re getting downvoted.

          • macaw_dean_settle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            It does not cost thousands. Also, their are cruise ships that will take you to other countries without flying. Again, Bahamas and Caribbean islands.

      • khepri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        For some people in some cases, sure. Myself, I traveled in South America for 3 months last year and overall I saved money vs. expenses in the US, even with airfare included. Also, there’s probably 100 million Americans that live within a single tank of gas of getting to Mexico or Canada. There are plenty of lower-income Americans, Brits, Aussies, and Germans (to name the big groups) who manage to travel extensively for long periods at very low expense. I’ve met many of them, and they could make “thousands of dollars” (let’s say you’re talking about $3,000) last a good three months in many parts of the world. Look for deals, be willing to not get exactly what you want, and be patient, and travel can be (and had been for me) cheaper overall than paying US prices for housing food etc.

        • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Just did a quick search and just to fly to all the european countries and asia I tried were over $1000. South America was $500+. Also, most of us still have to pay rent while we’re traveling, we own shit we can’t just abandon so it’s literally impossible for it to be cheaper to travel and what do you do when you come back to no job?

        • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          What about if you live in the real world? If I fell asleep for three months I’d wake up ten grand poorer. It’s great that you can completely uproot yourself for three months and then comeback and restart life and somehow save money, but that is so incredibly unrealistic. My bills don’t stop because I took a cheap trip to Brazil.

          • khepri@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Yeah it’s a different lifestyle and not appealing or possible for everyone in every situation of course (not that I implied it was but for some reason I feel the need to defend my self on that point). I get that the systems we all live under have many of us completely captured by debt or bills and impoverished to the point where the major concerns in life are getting enough to eat each day and not freezing to death homeless out on the street. It’s conditions like that elsewhere in the world which cause people to emigrate in search of a better life in the USA, ironically.

    • Pat_Riot@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Man, some of us are annoyed every time we have to drive into town to shop for groceries or go to work. I’m surrounded by nature at home. I don’t want to travel. You’d have to B. A. Baracas me to get me on an airplane or boat. I neither need nor want a passport.

      • khepri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        hahaha now there’s something I haven’t thought about in a minute. I honestly hate airports, airplanes, the TSA, and flying myself. But I do love seeing places and people and experiencing things that I never would have otherwise, whether that’s in my home town, across the state, or across the world, count me in :)

    • KelvarCherry@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      As a passport holder myself, that was my plan. This article has me wondering if we’d still be charged the fee. TSA is notoriously stupidly incompetent, and I wouldn’t put it past this system to be giving kickbacks to agents.

      • khepri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        idk, not by the letter of the law, no. But they are they are pretty awful sometimes. I personally always used my passport for all flights even before REAL ID existed, it’s just easier for them than offering a license from a rural state like I live in that they may see once or twice a day.

    • PumaStoleMyBluff@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      My real ID is 8 years versus my passport’s 10. And cheaper, less hassle to renew, and more convenient to carry. But I do have both.

      My state also hasn’t offered non-real IDs in several years.

  • cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    Is it that uncommon to have a passport in the US? That’s basically part of the common ID paper you’d have here.

    • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yes. We can travel over 3000 miles and still be in the same country with about every climate. Meanwhile for a family of 4 it would cost almost $700 to get passports and involve waiting weeks. Then flying say Seattle to Paris for instance would cost about $3000 before actually doing anything there. This is in addition to the $300-$400 spent every 5-7 years on normal identity documents that you need for other purposes. This cost varies substantially state to state.

      Meanwhile families here are facing drastically escalating costs especially housing and medical.

      Compare that to a European who could travel 100 km on the train and be in another country.

      Americans have both increased dis-incentives and less incentives to travel internationally compared to Europeans.

      • cley_faye@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        for a family of 4 it would cost almost $700 to get passports

        You lost me there for a moment. In France, a biometric passport costs 86 € (~$100) for 18+ people, 42 € (~$49) for kids between 15-17, and 17 € (~$20) for people younger than 15. It lasts 10 years for adults, and if you renew your national ID card and passport at the same time, you only pay for one (ID card alone is 25 €, ~$29).

        $700 for a family of 4 sounds insane. But if there’s no incentive, I guess I get it. I basically kept using my passport for a few decades instead of having an ID card, so it feels more natural to me.

        Compare that to a European who could travel 100 km on the train and be in another country.

        We don’t need a passport to go to most other European countries, fortunately.

      • Latuga17@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I mean EU citizens can also travel similar distances in the schengen zone without a passport and just an ID card.

        • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Does it cost $3000-$5000 for a family of 4 to go anywhere you would need one and require the family to shell out an extra $700 when half the population is living hand to mouth?

    • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Makes me wonder why they don’t want people flying. All these different things being done to make it harder for the average person to fly. I suppose it could just be incompetence, but it really feels like there’s intent behind it.

  • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    4 days ago

    We still need to go through the process to make sure that we verify who you are

    As long as I don’t have any weapons it shouldn’t matter.

      • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Unless you are using a fake ID and fake credit card then they already have that data?

        They know John Smith who lives at 123 Main Street in Bumbfuck, WI and who paid with credit card 1234567890123456 is flying from MSN to LAX on December 1st, 2025 and returning via the same route on December 3rd, 2025.

        The RealID requirements are to, theoretically, streamline the process of matching person to face with more standardized ID requirements. Like all ID related legislature there is good and bad there.

        But if your focus is on The Man tracking you? This changes nothing unless you are already actively committing fraud at MANY levels.

        • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          I suspect this is what the payment requirement is really about. Like, yes they’re getting money, but they’re also getting a credit card transaction at the gate at the date and time of travel.

          It’s always possible that someone else purchased your travel ticket for you (for instance I sometimes travel for work which my employer’s travel agency books for me). But if you have to pay at the moment when your ID would be checked, presumably that has to be your personal card that you have on you in the moment.

          • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            My understanding is that most airlines will still allow you to pay, in cash, at the customer service desk in the baggage area the day of. But they still require ID and you can be DAMNED sure that about forty different flags went off in a database if you do that.

            But yeah. Credit cards are immensely useful. They also go a LONG way towards providing very trackable behaviors for people.

        • flandish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          neat. there is no reason they even need an id. do you need one to gain access to the highways?

          • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Most highways are publicly accessible (and still log you with a Flock™ camera anyway…). But if you want to use the priority lane in states like Colorado? Yeah, they need to scan your pass and they very much do.

            The ID still matches the face/body to the Person. Its no different than checking if you are the person with a reservation at a hotel. That said, you can bet there is work in place to not actually need it through a mix of facial ID and profiling.

            • flandish@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              that’s my point. outside of a thin lane or three, which is probably considerable “private” - public infra should be accessible. Last I checked (abt six months ago) I did not need to show ID to hop on the brewster line into grand central.

              it’s all just a cash grab and control theater / normalization at airports. there is nothing special about flying compared to trains, except of course: profit.

              • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                I did not need to show ID to hop on the brewster line into grand central.

                Because those are public roads. Not high priority roads you pay for access to. Just like fully government funded buses and the like don’t care if you have a ticket or not. Whereas those that are only subsidized tend to still require a pass/ticket/payment.

                Also I’ll just point out: Your car has a license plate. It is trivial to read those with an overhead camera. And, depending on the road/day, you can bet a cop will gladly run you down if they spot you have no license plate or decide they care about the polarized screen you put on top of it. At which point you can bet they’ll want to see your ID and won’t take “I am a sovereign citizen and this is a public road” as an answer.

                there is nothing special about flying compared to trains

                And you need to tie your body to your ticket when you get on a train. We tend to not care anywhere near as much about security with trains (because everyone knows bombs and box cutters only work if you are at least 100 feet above the ground!), but you can be damned sure the ticket machine where you inserted your cash took a picture of your face to go with it.

                I genuinely don’t care about what kind of libertarian nonsense you are on about hating the concept of IDs at all. My point was simply that if you think the RealID requirement has ANY bearing on The Man knowing where you are and where you are going then… you don’t actually understand what your exposure is.

                • flandish@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  i should have clarified: “access” meant physical meatspace access not allowance.

                • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  And the VIP lane on the highway is a private road?

                  Whats next, HOV Lane brought to you by Carl’s Jr.?

                  Stop normalizing the surveillance state. It’s not a good look.

    • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      3 days ago

      Well, it’s never been about security, it’s about surveillance. But it is reasonable to assume that REAL ID is their most efficient way to track travelers, and if you make them use their less efficient methods of tracking, they’ll offset the difference by charging you directly.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      4 days ago

      One could argue surveillance and tracking is about security. They’d be wrong. But they could argue that.

      • meco03211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        4 days ago

        That’s absolutely about security. Just not yours. There’s a lot of people whose financial security is at risk if they can’t sell that data.

  • GuyFawkes@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    I mean, at this point we’ve known it was coming for like 20 years now - really no excuse to not have one.

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      My excuse was I didn’t want a federal ID card. Not under a democrat and especially not under Trump.

      • Homesnatch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Real ID is still a state issued ID. It just now complies with a federal standard.

        Passport is a Federal ID.

        • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          So it’s a state id card the federal government will have an easy time accessing rather then a federal id card the federal government will have a easy time accessing?

          • Homesnatch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            The real ID requirements on state-issued cards don’t change or improve the ability for the federal government to access… They already have all the access they need into state IDs and all your info plenty of other ways.

            All state IDs, real ID or not, are shared with the NLETS Federal registry.

              • Homesnatch@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                It standardizes the requirements to obtain the ID across states. There is more proof of residency and citizenship required than a standard ID.