Rep. Shri Thanedar (D-Mich.) announced Wednesday he plans to introduce articles of impeachment against Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth.

Why it matters: The long-shot effort centers on two scandals currently rocking the Pentagon — a new report about Signalgate and allegations of a follow-up strike against an alleged Venezuelan drug boat.

  • Jhuskindle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    Didnt he also already put in articles of impeachment on Trump? Theyve been sitting there since March or something

  • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    Rumors have been going around that Hegseth was gonna get fired early next year anyway.

    Apparently Trump promised not to fire any cabinet members for a year bc he had such turmoil amongst the turnover during his first term.

    Sorry for the CNN article. I actually read a story about this back in Sept but I can’t remember where and CNN was the first I could find referencing the same idea.

    At the time I read about, it was over Signalgate and the embarrassing Trump at the Fat Generals Speech.

    https://www.cnn.com/2025/11/21/politics/trump-cabinet-kristi-noem-chris-wright

  • HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    210
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Good.

    Fuck Hakeem Jefferies. Pussy wanted to protect Hegseth because he’s more concerned about alienating the entirely fictional demographic of GOP voters who might flip Dem if the Dems become more semi-fascist

    • minorkeys@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Every politician has a unique means of staying in power, favours, friends, appeal, funding, handlers, Jeffrey’s may simply not be able to stay in power if he doesn’t do this. These people don’t adhere to idealistic ideology or fancy ideas, they trade in power and persuasion.

      • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Well we should destroy the system that enables this and remove these people from any position of power indefinitely. I personally also think they should be put in fucking prison.

          • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            There are literally thousands of books written about different systems than this one, many of which I would consider better.

            • Zachariah@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              I have no clue which ones you’re imagining. What are some examples, and how would we put it in place?

              • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                1 day ago

                The first step is ranked choice voting for everything from local to federal elections.

                First past the post is literally the worst way to operate a voting system of your goal is to get an accurate representation of the populace.

                • Zachariah@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  I’m very much in favor of the reforms of ranked choice and proportional representation (fairvote.org).

                  But these aren’t really a replacement after we destroy the current system. More like incremental fixes for the current system.

                  I’d still like to understand more about the vision of destroying (what’s the plan?) the system and what would come next (what’s part two of the plan?).

    • bradv@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      They’re not moving rightward to appease the voters, they’re doing it to appease the corporate donors.

    • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      80
      ·
      2 days ago

      More and more it looks like controlled opposition. It sounded like a conspiracy theory, but I’m now truly starting to be convinced that Schummer and Jeffries were bought.

  • N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 days ago

    Good to see resistance. Even if it doesn’t gather support now it’s always good to take the first steps. Move Kegsbreath’s impeachment into view in a corner of whatever the Overton window has become in the age of disinformation.

  • Konala Koala@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    It would be better if it’s “Democrat announces articles of impeachment against Trump” instead to cut all this shit off at the root.

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Impeach remove convict and then president piggy pardons him.

    • Impeachment is not a criminal trial.

      Impeachment is explicitly not allowed to be pardoned in the constitution.

      After a 2/3 conviction and removal, it takes only a simple majority vote to disqualify for future office. Can’t pardon this, I mean they could try, then we’d be in a constitutional crisis.

      Problem would be finding that 67 senators willing to vote to convict. Aint happening, everyone is corrupt.