• DokPsy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      3 months ago

      Does it even fucking matter at this point? There will be zero repercussions for the blatant disregard for the law to serve the authoritarian regime so they can say whatever they want

    • BertramDitore@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, for real. Let’s hope the Majestic Imperious High Court deigns to grace us with any explanation. They love their emergency docket…

    • vortic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Here’s the fun part. They’ll use the shadow docket and won’t give any rationale.

    • blitzen@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I obviously disagree with this ruling, but if they were to rule the opposite on California, the absolute sheer corruptness would be undeniable. And worthily of drastic and dramatic action on our (the citizens) part.

      • bear@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        Citizens wouldn’t even vote in their own interest, and now it’s too late. I’m convinced tens of millions of Americans will die quietly before even one stands up.

      • spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Their sheer corruptness is already undeniable. The six right wing hacks regularly make decisions that are blatantly and obviously unconstitutional and write nonsense opinions to justify them. They openly accept huge bribes from those impacted by their decisions and then rule in their favor. If the GOP gave a damn about the rule of law and the Constitution they would have been impeached long ago.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Okay but then it’ll be double plus undeniable. People will definitely do something in response. You’ll see.

  • ryper@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    142
    ·
    3 months ago

    In a brief order, the conservative majority argued, among other things, that the District Court had intervened to block the maps too close to next year’s midterm election.

    Eleven months away is too close to the next election for these clowns.

    • credo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      3 months ago

      Texas passed their new maps on August 29th. On November 18 the district court ordered them to revert to their previous maps.

      Apparently the SC’s Republican cult members think this will be too difficult for Texas?

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      87
      ·
      3 months ago

      The decision has nothing to do with their stated reasons; they are in favor of racism, but don’t want to say so

    • howl2@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Especially since the maps were drawn up new a month ago. Or should I read more carefully?

      • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        3 months ago

        Same bullshit that Mitch McConnell claimed why Obama couldn’t appoint a Supreme Court justice fuck this illegmeaite Supreme Court.

        • TacoSocks@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          And then did a speed run to install a Supreme Court Justice like 45 days before an election under Trump.

    • akilou@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 months ago

      But wouldn’t the opposite be true? Changing the maps too close to the election is a problem. “Keeping them the same too close to the election” makes no sense.

    • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      No no, dont even give it that much dignity. The complainants are not asking to “block the map” too close (11 months) to elections. They are asking that the map not be illicit, unethically changed 5 years early, based off the explicit public request of the President who is not meant to have power over state election matters, with the explicitly stated intent of gerrymandering out more seats for Republicans that they “deserve” than they otherwise would have won, only 15ish months to the elections (which is apparently plenty of time). Their “reasoning” doesn’t make sense because it’s not reasoning. It’s blatant full chested support of voter suppression/disenfranchisement to bolster their party and their autocratic President. They’re so full of shit you could smell them talking from the next room over. Fuck those lying, cheating, corrupt, un-American, fascist cunts.

    • HocEnimVeni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      3 months ago

      Dont forget 9 months is too close to an election to approve a supreme court justice nomination, unless the president is Republican and then less than a month is plenty of time

      • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Election was already underway. There were already absentee balls cast ousting him from office when they approved his nomination

  • WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Every day MAGA trash feels safe leaving their homes is a day the rest of you show your cowardice, America

    • superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Its a hard thing to come to terms with. Families are split in two. To take up arms means we are doing it against our own family members. In my case it would be my father and brother.

      • WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Your father and brother are Nazis.

        If they aren’t afraid of you, you’re a coward or you’re complicit. There isn’t any grey area with fascism.

            • Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Yep those are the only options.

              Prove yourself an enemy or sit idle.

              A profound lack of nuance.

              Sowing community and peeling undecideds, Sabotaging, undermining, informing, rearing confusion and exploiting divisions that exist within the power structure, encouraging idleness in the enemy even.

              The enemies of fascism and ways to resist it are myriad. And yet you can only imagine a sword to meet a sword.

              And frankly; there’s no faster road to that gulag. Or more likely an abrupt meaningless death that accomplishes nothing.

              Rage and cast aspersions from your safe nest, blame anyone who hasn’t given up on everyone that’s on the other side. Reduce the work of ages to a simple numbers game. Throw away every weapon that seems too complex or involved, deny all clemency and revoke the rights of others to offer it.

              Surely that’s what we need. Another great war will kill the demon.

  • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Fascinating stuff! It’s like russia with extra steps and a gigantic amount of comical ostentatious posturing about freedoms and liberty.

    Americans do love their theatrics!

    • Aqarius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Political maneuver literally named after a US politician

      “Wow, this is just like Foreignistan!”

  • TemplaerDude@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s so long past the point that Americans should have begun shooting these traitors, they’re just gonna fucking let the fascism happen and tweet about it at this point.

  • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    3 months ago

    We should start calling it Robertsmander rather than Gerrymander from now on. If having no shame while he’s living has no effect, then the best he deserves is his name being tarnished and synonymous with corruption for hundreds of years.

  • BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    Agreed! It’s MUCH too Close to an Election to Make Changes!

    -The Supreme Court Justice who was appointed AFTER people ALREADY Voted!

  • meeeeetch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    The way that special election in Tennessee went, instead of picking up five seats, they’re liable to only be left with five seats (after all, you can’t grab more districts without weakening your hold on others).