• scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    At least he’s living in this century, as opposed to Trump, who is still stuck in the 80s watching cable TV and talking about his “ratings.”

  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Party of personal freedom and free speech y’all

    I for one believe people should have the freedom to be annoying.

    • YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Man seriously. Kids are always going to have dinner inside joke/nonsense they’ll use as way to separate themselves. 67 I believe is on the nonsense side after watching a language Jones video about it. But let kids be kids. I’m sure we had some dumb shit we did back then. Just there weren’t cameras everywhere live streaming us being idiots.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Hell I’m young enough my generation’s stupid shit was posted to the internet. We yoloed and had rage comics about le epic bacon, as we asked what the fox says and sang about Friday and calling us maybe, and now it’s cringe but it’s also good memories of our youth. Hell that doesn’t even touch on the hell that was the homestuck kids (who are now adults, many even have ok taste now). And it all happened right here on the devil’s own internet. It’s still up as Tumblr likes to dredge up from time to time.

        Someday 67 will be that for the kids these days. And more will come. Some may be like rickrolling and become classic, but in a less omnipresent form, while others will be like homestuck and be weirdly influential on future culture when you look at how terrible it is in retrospect. But it’s theirs to do.

  • Randelung@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s the best meme I’ve ever heard now. Watch me put it 6 7 times in every comment.

    … Wait no. I can’t if you’re watching.

      • Fondots@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        Just as an aside, most police codes aren’t really standardized across different agencies.

        There’s a handful of 10-codes that are pretty much universal, like “10-4”

        67 isn’t one of those codes. A lot of departments do use it for a report of a death

        But it’s also commonly used to advise of an important incoming message

        And other agencies may have other uses for it

        And other agencies use other systems besides 10 codes, I believe some departments in CA have been known to use penal code numbers

        But so because of that, there’s been a big movement in emergency service to use plain language over codes for the last decade or two, mostly since Katrina since different agencies using different codes lead to a lot of miscommunication there.

        I work in 911 dispatch, at my agency and pretty much everywhere around me it’s all plain language. One or two 10-codes linger around, more as informal slang than anything that gets official use. 10-4 sometimes gets used, but that’s practically just part of the English language now.

        10-96 also kind of lingers around in my agency, which in the set of 10-codes they used before I started was for a subject with mental health issues. We’re not really supposed to use it but no one has really come up with a better shorthand for it so it still pops up from time to time, mostly from our officers.

          • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            In Philly (where the song 6-7 originated comes from and the code being referenced) a 72 hour involuntary mental health hold is a 302 (and then 303/304 if the hold is extended beyond 72hrs). 5150 is a California code, I think, but it’s def not national

            • Fondots@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              A 302 can actually be up to 120 hours

              303 is up to 20 days

              304 is 90

              There’s also a 305, which I believe is up to 180

              And technically a 306, but that has to do with transferring involuntary commitment patients to another facility or something.

              Like I said in another comment I work in PA and my wife happens to work at a psych hospital so I get to hear all about this stuff.

              • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                Well I’ll be damned.

                I also work in pa and while I do outpatient now I worked in inpatient for years. Whoops! To be fair it’s been years since I did hospital stuff and admissions was never my deal. I couldn’t remember the longer ones for the life of me. I could’ve sworn 302 was 72, but you’re definitely right

                • Fondots@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  All good, I always feel like it’s 72 hours, and I think the equivalent in most states is only 72 I think we’re the odd one out on that, and I feel like in most cases patients managed to get stabilized enough to be discharged after the 72 hours.

                  I kind of feel like the extra two days are mostly so there’s time to get everything set up for a 303 in case the patient tries to fight it and it goes to court. I had to be a witness for that over a call I took once, I only got like a day or two’s notice because it all has to happen on such a condensed timeline

        • Deebster@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Interesting stuff, thanks for writing it up.

          I did know that US codes weren’t standardised, partially because the video covers it - perhaps I should have phrased it as “a police code” to be more technically correct. Edit: or bothered to check the video so could have written “Philadelphia police code” - but then I would have missed out on your reply.

          • Fondots@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            Funnily enough, I actually work in an agency that’s very close to Philly and deal with my counterparts in the city fairly regularly.

            I don’t get (or want) to listen to a whole lot of PPD radio chatter, we have plenty in our own county to keep us busy, so I don’t know for certain if they’re actually still using 10-codes or any other similar system or not. I can’t think of any time I’ve heard a Philly officer or dispatcher use one with me, but it’s certainly possible that they’re still in use there internally.

            Also even though we’re using plain language, there’s still some weird miscommunication that happens.

            I remember one time needing to advise Philly of a report of gunshots we received that might have been relevant to them, it was near their border.

            So I called over to their dispatch and advised them that “we received a report of shots fired in the area of…”

            Which kind of sent their dispatcher into a bit of a tizzy because in Philly dispatch lingo “shots fire” basically means an officer has fired their gun, but to us it’s just any report of gunshots (which, more often than not, means fireworks or something that the caller mistook for gunshots)

              • Fondots@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                It is and it isn’t

                Certain things absolutely need to be standardized

                But in other cases it can just kind of bog things down.

                I remember one training thing we had to do to keep our certifications up to date, part of it had to do with fire dispatch.

                And at the beginning of that, our instructor basically said “Almost nothing in this course is at all relevant to us. But it’s a national standard and we have to teach this to you”

                It had a lot to do with wildland firefighting and some other specific situations that have nothing to do with how things operate in our area or with the kinds of situations we deal with.

                It was interesting, I learned some fun facts, but I haven’t yet had any reason to use any of the knowledge I picked up from that training.

                And that time could have probably been better spent doing something else.

  • ruuster13@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 day ago

    When we were kids all of our viral trends at least had an origin story.

    Like that one where Marilyn manson removed some ribs so he could fuck his couch better.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    So Americans should now count 65, 66, 68, 69? At least this is in line with measuring things with non-metric units.

  • seriousslayerguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    I am speechless, how can it all be so absurd. How do they come up with even more stupid ideas than before every single day.

  • cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    “Oh no, a number, that’s threatening the greatness of the US and we must act immediately!”

    • Some couch fucker, probably