I’d like to be able to chat from an Android phone without a SIM card.

Edit: Since several people have mentioned it, I’m including this note at the top. There are security issues with using a temporary number to register even if it is not needed to maintain the account. Anyone can gain access to the number and use it for account recovery, etc. I’m not an infosec person at all, but this seems pretty obviously bad. Some services will work fine with a landline or other permanent phone number, as long as you retain private access to the number.

  • solrize@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    GNU Jami though I had trouble getting it to work reliably, and you have to install an app. YMMV.

    Jitsi is decent, especially if you don’t mind using their server meet.jit.si (may have changed by now). It uses WebRTC (i.e. you can use it with just a browser) which I think is preferable to a mobile app.

    I think there will inherently be some lag if you’re using a mobile phone at the client side, because of all the codecs, wifi latency etc.

    This shouldn’t be that hard a technical problem especially if you’re ok with audio-only. I don’t know why the existing programs all have probs in some areas. Jitsi is nice to use but a pain to self-host from what I can tell.

    I have a self-hosted nextcloud that has a video chat feature (Nextcloud Talk) but it’s not great.

    I have been wanting to spend a chunk of time looking into the situation and finding a good answer, or at least identifying the trade-offs clearly.

      • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        I can’t speak for them, but personally I’ve been moving away from matrix entirely for a few reasons.

        Element was always a buggy mess on my phone, and a shitty electron app on my laptop.

        It was too difficult for normals and while I disagree, they wouldn’t use it. What’s a chat app without contacts after all?

        While element was bugging and I was awaiting an update, I found out that the Matrix [.] org foundation was started as a project at Amdocs, then when it was defunded the lead of the project created the foundation. Amdocs is fucking sketchy, they’re associated with mossad and have infiltrated the US telcom networks. Now look, I’m not saying they backdoored matrix, but they did do the other thing and backdooring a chat app would be right in line with their entire schtick, and I’m just too fucking paranoid for that, straight up. It also leaks metadata like piss to any server that federates with yours so if mossad is working with the matrix org, they get all of it just by your server federating with the largest, “official” server. To some degree, metadata seems inescapable, but almost anyone is better than mossad.

        They also have a bit of a CP problem in their public rooms so stay out of those, but don’t worry due to that problem they removed searching for public rooms so you have to know the addr to join, so they make it hard to stumble into them, but also now you can’t search for public rooms which is a hinderance if you did want to join, say, the rasberry pi room, despite the risk of cp being posted.

        BUT they don’t require phone numbers!

        So for now I’m trying out Delta Chat, seems alright so far. No video calling though.

        But yeah maybe that whole Amdocs connection to the “official server” is what they were referencing, but if not I’d like to know their reason!

        • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Interesting information. I didn’t know about the potential tie. Honestly, any “intelligence” agency is as bad a tie for a chat app, especially one that claims privacy. I have no one on Delta, but I’ve had it installed for a while : / maybe one day…

  • ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    If you feel like setting up a stun/turn server it’s possible to set up your own using something like xmpp or next cloud talk. Works for individual accounts with friends if not a plug and go app.

    • zdanger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I have an ejabberd server setup for my family for this reason. Using the Conversations app off F-Droid and Gajim on desktops

  • Zachariah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Threema

    It’s around $5 for the app. No phone number needed. End-to-end encryption for chat and calls (audio/video). Desktop versions are in beta.

    iOS and Android

  • Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    It looks like Session has video calls in beta.

    Note that most services requiring a phone number for registration don’t actually require that phone number to be connected to a SIM card in the device you’re using. That may be helpful depending on your use case.

  • ragica@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    NextCloud has end-to-end encrypted voice and video chat, and of course a whole bunch else, since people are mentioning self-hosting. The corresponding Android app “nextcloud talk”.

    • snowdriftissue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Phreeli is overpriced and doesn’t actually grant much privacy despite their claims. Telecom providers can still have a field day with your location and sms/call data even if Phreeli isn’t collecting that themselves, which is also really just a pinky promise at this point. There are also competing services already which don’t require PII either but have more reasonable prices.

      If you want a phone number just to sign up for signal or something just use jmp.chat smspool or mysudo depending on your needs.

    • gedaliyah@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      There are some issues with that, since someone else could access the phone number in the future. Using a number that you don’t have exclusive access to opens up a security problem when it comes to account recovery, etc.