• bitjunkie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    The UN has always been a toothless exercise in decorum. They don’t hold any influence over someone who doesn’t care about manners.

    • arrow74@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Arguably its main functions were to convince the US and Russia not to start a nuclear holocaust and to give western nations a way to meddle in poor/developing nations affairs or politics.

      It never could stop a wealthy nation from doing anything

    • Asafum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      2 months ago

      Fucking exactly.

      A “law” with no enforcement mechanism is just a suggestion…

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s there to make sure that people think it’s useful for anything, keeps them from organizing something more useful themselves

        • pressanykeynow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Technically the UN was established way before the USSR had nukes and actually even a month before the US made the Trinity test. So at least originally the purpose for the UN was different.

    • RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      To avoid world war 3 & to cooperatively fix problems that can’t be fixed by individual nations.

      Apart from having been able to prevent ww3 so far, the UN has also done a lot of good that without them might not have happened. Fixing the ozone layer holes, making international shipping less pollutant, famine food aid programs without too large strings attached, …

      But the UN itself has no real power, they depend on the willing participation of the powerful member nations & if the powerful are on board, then those can coerce enough of the rest to participate. But now the most powerful nation is no longer a willing participant, so who can coerce them to play ball? It’s the start of a new world order and we don’t know yet what it’s going to look like. Probably shittier, but how much shittier we don’t really know yet.

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    All those large boats full of goodies just drifting along the ocean at turtle’s pace.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    America: “International Law says we get to bomb the UN.”

    UN: “No it do-” boom

    America: “I’m not hearing any objections, so that makes it legal”

    • altkey (he\him)@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      The ICC: We should do something!

      The US: r u sure

      The ICC: And how can we cancel a person who isn’t even our subscriber?

      Just like everything with the US, even when they were smiling, they were smiling not with, but at others.