• Godort@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 days ago

      A few competent project managers would probably help things quite a bit, actually.

      Having a single point of contact for several disparate teams of people doing real work so that they can actually do that work, instead of spending extra time in endless meetings arguing over the best way to implement something that requires multiple people’s input is a valuable tool to have.

      Think of them like a tank in an RPG, taking all the meeting hits that would otherwise decimate the effectiveness of people actually putting the real work in.

      • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        23 days ago

        Valid. Competent is the key word. I’m lucky, in that most of the ones I work with are actually really good, but the ones my colleagues work with (in the same company, different division) might as well have gotten their PMMP certificate out of a cereal box.

        • Godort@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          23 days ago

          Oh yeah, Project management is one of those roles that is especially vulnerable to the Peter Principal.

          In order to be a good one, you need to be part therapist and part hostage negotiator while also being one of those weirdos that enjoys meetings

    • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      23 days ago

      What? You won’t pay me to be impatient? That’s bullshit.

      Just get more people working on it and it will get done on time, I’m sure the resources are there, just look at the chart, we cannot afford to delay schedule!

    • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 days ago

      Disagree. I’ve worked on some projects that would absolutely fall apart without our PMs. They are vital.