• PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      The 80’s and 90’s were my formative years, so “my dudes” has taken on a gender-agnostic meaning in my view (anecdotal evidence alert), so much so that I address whoever I’ve got in my team for a given day:

      • A team full of guys? “Good morning my dudes”;

      • A team of mostly guys and some women? “Good morning my dudes”;

      • A team of mostly girls and one or two guys? “Good morning my dudes”;

      • A team full of girls? “Good morning my dudes” (maybe “dudettes” but then I feel I’m making an exception based on gender which seems demeaning, so dudes is safer);

      • A team of a guy, a girl, a rabbit in a hat, and a dog? “Good morning my dudes”;

      • A team full of Avril Lavignes? “hey hey you you I don’t like your girlfriend”;

      • A team full of people I don’t know because it’s dark? “Good morning my dudes”.

      I am a simple person.

      • arrow74@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        I think it is more acknowledging the shift in some English words from their strictly gendered origins.

        How this affects you and your own feelings is entirely personal, but I do think the important message is that if someone uses one of these words they likely are not attaching gender to it. While this may not alleviate your dysphoria, I think it’s nice to know people aren’t misgendering you but instead are using previously gendered words in a gender neutral way.

        • pooberbee (they/she)@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          You misunderstood me, I think. My reply was about their phrasing. “Should’ve taught” makes it sound like the onus is on me to idk watch Good Burger (which I have seen, and I understand the reference, by the way) and feel some great relief.

          • arrow74@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            I’d say if its an individual in your life that you have told to not refer to you that way then yes.

            If it is a stranger, particularly a younger stranger, then assuming misgendering is probably going to not be linguistically accurate and cause you uneccessary mental distress.

            I think the increased neutrality of previously gendered words is overall a good thing.

              • arrow74@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                6 days ago

                Gotcha, I misinterpreted your meaning there. I thought the indication was people should be educated to know and found that impractical.

                We’re on the same page