• gustofwind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 days ago

    It says ICE agents are allowed to forcibly enter a person’s home using an administrative warrant if a judge has issued a “final order of removal.” Administrative warrants permit officers and agents to make arrests and are different from judicial warrants, which judges or magistrates sign allowing entry into homes.

    It’s basically a new legal theory (like the bush torture memos you can just make them up) and they’re claiming the preexisting administrative warrant is good enough

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      The article says it’s also not a search warrant, which backs up their claim saying they can enter because they aren’t searching.

      Which is stupid.

      But if it’s not a search warrant, and they start doing this, I wonder if there’s some way to protect yourself by requiring finding you in the house to constitute a search?

      Like what if you attached a bookshelf to your bedroom door. And you had to move a book to access the handle?

      That’s a search?

      Maybe that’s a way to try to continue legally protecting yourself within their illegal entry? Or something like that anyway.

      • MotoAsh@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        They’re already ignoring law. Stop looking for loopholes and start looking for safe shooting positions.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Pretty sure a ‘hidden’ room is a good spot to shoot from if that’s the decision you’re going to make.

          It will make it more obvious they are about to enter it somehow.

          edit: Also boobytraps would probably be effective at that point as well.

          • MotoAsh@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Just remember, an annoyed invader that has no external challenge can just set your house on fire and smoke you out, boobytraps or no.

              • MotoAsh@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                Not necessarily ICE, but 1. I wouldn’t put it past them. and 2. If even a lame-ass civil war largely in name only erupts, you bet your ass fascist pieces of shit would torch someone’s house before they put themselves in actual proved danger.

      • EpeeGnome@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Problem with that idea is that they don’t actually care about any of the technicalities one way or the other, they just tossed out a somewhat plausible sounding “justification” to have something to point to. Their idiots will believe the justification regardless, and everyone else’s time can be wasted arguing about it.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          I mean ya, if they’re coming into the house they’re going to come and get ya administrative warrant or not (edit: because we all know they’ll come in even without that), and if you can’t get a lawyer to prevent yourself from being deported before they deport you, none of this does any good.

          But if you can manage to get as far as they entered, and had to search to find you, and they didn’t just deport you anyway before being able to get in front of a court, it would make a difference in theory.