• WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s a country of 300 million people.

    But don’t worry, it won’t be for long.

    The ideal number they rounded is 100 million. You will most-likely be deported (or killed) yourself.

        • bigmamoth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          racist is being against someone comming to your country with no verification ? We had like litteral killer and terrorist that did this btw

          • zbyte64@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            There is a Big difference between requiring documentation to stay in a country and enforcing said policy by requiring everyone to carry papers.

            • jack_of_sandwich@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Bigmouth’s got plenty of room to fit that boot in their mouth as long as they’re told the policy is about hurting immigrants

            • bigmamoth@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              how do you check you have the right to be in the country if you can’t check documentation ?

              By enforcing ? cite me one law that isnt enforced and is a sucess ?

              • zbyte64@awful.systems
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                Your question of enforcement only makes sense if you think “papers please” is the only way to enforce this law. Other means of enforcement include requiring papers when applying for employment or any government program or purchasing interstate travel or purchasing lethal means.

                  • zbyte64@awful.systems
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 day ago

                    If you were a human trafficker you would prefer “papers please”. Without that law your stock might wander off and find their own freedom. With ICE roaming about the trafficked are more scared to be in public. I’m not sure how people are trafficked in France but out here they do so in secret compartments in trucks.

              • jack_of_sandwich@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                If they’re just walking down the street?

                You don’t. You assume they have the right to walk down the street. Or drive down the street

                If you think they’re here illegally, you collect evidence then you get a warrant and arrest them, prove they’re here illegally and deport them.

                  • jack_of_sandwich@lemmy.sdf.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    Take the boot out of your mouth and think.

                    If you don’t have a reason to think they’re illegal (and no, “They look muslim” is NOT reason to think they’re illegal), you have no reason to stop them and ask them for id.

        • jack_of_sandwich@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          The US doesn’t have a monopoly on racism. Right wing bigots in Europe have been stirring up anti-immigrant sentiment (and that’s part of what was behind Brexit)