• Jake Farm@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 day ago

    These fucking production companies always think they can do better than the original authors and they never do.

    • IWW4@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      That is just not true.

      See:

      • The Last Of Us
      • Adaption
      • All the President’s Men
      • The Maltese Falcon
      • Jurassic Park
      • Jaws
      • The Godfather
      • Die Hard
      • All the Harry Potter Movies
      • The Shawshank Redemption
      • Nihilore@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        21 hours ago

        All but 1 of those is pre streaming era and that 1 is highly questionable part of this list

      • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        16 hours ago

        The last of us had naughty dog on board, and the showrunner had just done the amazing Chernobyl.

        Jurassic Park was Spielberg, possibly the greatest blockbuster director of all time.

        Jk Rowling was heavily involved with the Harry Potter movies including casting.

        Not all adaptiations are bad, but when it’s a cash in movie or series, it’s often those without involvement of the original writer that struggle.

        Being involved doesn’t have to be the main writer. For instance game of thrones had george rr martin involved but had different writers. It’s when they didn’t have source material that it went off the rails.

          • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            It’s rare for any adaptation to be better than the source material. Usually the best you’d hope for is as good, or nearly as good but more accessible.