The article title is click bait here is the full article:

Wondering what your career looks like in our increasingly uncertain, AI-powered future? According to Palantir CEO Alex Karp, it’s going to involve less of the comfortable office work to which most people aspire, a more old fashioned grunt work with your hands.

Speaking at the World Economic Forum yesterday, Karp insisted that the future of work is vocational — not just for those already in manufacturing and the skilled trades, but for the majority of humanity.

In the age of AI, Karp told attendees at a forum, a strong formal education in any of the humanities will soon spell certain doom.

“You went to an elite school, and you studied philosophy; hopefully you have some other skill,” he warned, adding that AI “will destroy humanities jobs.”

Karp, who himself holds humanities degrees from the elite liberal arts institutions of Haverford College and Stanford Law, will presumably be alright. With a net worth of $15.5 billion — well within the top 0.1 percent of global wealth owners — the Palantir CEO has enough money and power to live like a feudal lord (and that’s before AI even takes over.)

The rest of us, he indicates, will be stuck on the assembly line, building whatever the tech companies require.

“If you’re a vocational technician, or like, we’re building batteries for a battery company… now you’re very valuable, if not irreplaceable,” Karp insisted. “I mean, y’know, not to divert to my usual political screeds, but there will be more than enough jobs for the citizens of your nation, especially those with vocational training.”

Now, there’s nothing wrong with vocational work or manufacturing. The global economy runs on these jobs. But in a theoretical world so fundamentally transformed by AI that intellectual labor essentially ceases to exist, it’s telling that tech billionaires like Karp see the rest of humanity as their worker bees.

It seems that the AI revolution never seems to threaten those who stand to profit the most from it — just the 99.9 percent of us building their batteries.

  • boogiebored@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    Humanities is literally exactly what ai is terrible at.

    The tech folks might need to reskill and look out.

    People will still be writing excellent poetry and we will need it more than ever. It will be spoken word and written and unreachable by the technical tendrils of these devils for training data.

    People who think the humanities don’t matter are husks of human beings. Capitalist dogs with zero personality, no actual skill, and only insatiable greed. And apparently all pedophiles to boot.

    These fucks lack humanity. They are AI agents with system prompt “mak munny”. Losers.

  • Alloi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    id also tell my competition to stop trying and get a real job if i felt like they were still a threat, you know, if i was an insecure, narcissistic, sociopath, with a visible coke addiction, and access to large swathes of investor capital, in an industry that fundamentally cannot turn a profit unless its through circular investment.

  • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 days ago

    “AI will replace a humanities degree, so don’t bother going to college,” says billionaire who went to college. “I need you to use your hands to build batteries for my shitty AI that doesn’t work.”

  • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 days ago

    Can we replace CEOs and the wealthy with AI? They don’t do anything AI can’t do. Would there be any reason to let them keep massive wealth if they aren’t contributing anything?

  • dipcart@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    Hilarious that they’ve pivoted from assembly automation, which is feasible and meaningful and in fact is happening, to arts/humanities automation, which isn’t really possible when you think about how training works.

    A lot of menial tasks can be automated and that’s probably fine… There’s a lot of stupid meaningless shit we have to do everyday. And maybe we could eliminate that stuff from the grind considering its all arbitrary, or maybe automate it away.

    Regardless, doesn’t the idea that both sides of the aisle, vocational and office jobs, approaching automation mean that maybe we should start talking about things not costing anything anymore?

  • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    if working with my hands like a peasant paid what my job does, I’d do it in a heartbeat. fuck this mental exhaustion and stress, I’d rather be working the field eight hours a day for the same pay

    AI is not coming for my job, which leads me to believe it’s not coming for that many other ‘skilled’ jobs

  • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 days ago

    Are they stupid as fuck? On the knowledge of whom does he think their models are trained? Idiotic thieves.

    • MangoCats@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Not just that, but “working with your hands” has been seen all kinds of machines automating people out of jobs for the past 200+ years, AI/LLM will only make automation more capable, and more undercutting of people’s manual labor costs.

    • burghler@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      Idk we’ve learned that American citizens don’t do shit all even when the boots on their neck.

      • stylusmobilus@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        They’re beginning to stir. The only thing they can do is passively resist and they’re becoming more aware of that each day.

      • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        It isn’t on their neck to be brutally frank. Going after illegal immigrants and terrorizing Minnesota isn’t hitting the vast majority of Americans. History shows when the middle/lower classes become desperate and food becomes an issue that is when the knives come out.

        • Seth Taylor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          “food becomes an issue”

          Literally the first thing any Romanians mention to me about the late 80s, right before the revolution. Stores were empty and everyone was lining up for rations.

      • tomkatt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        I know you think the snark is cute or funny, but resistance is happening. Courts are ruling on things, people are protesting massively, and Minneapolis is actively resisting. Peacefully. Read your history. Peaceful protest does work.

      • discocactus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        To be fair it’s not on most people’s necks yet. 80% of people are free to ignore what’s happening so far. And most of them have. But the ratchet will click. Likely as not the world will get the bloody spectacle they apparently are craving.

  • atrielienz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 days ago

    Didn’t Ford’s CEO just say they wanted highschool graduates who could do math to be automotive techs making $120K a year?

    Plumbers already make ridiculous amounts of money because there aren’t enough of them.

    The median age in my field 5-10 years ago was 55 years old and we aren’t getting an influx of new A&P licensed techs still. The main way the Aviation industry gets it’s techs these days is the military and that’s not even a sure fire way.

    Like. CEO’s doing trades when? Because he’s clearly mistaken if he thinks that it’s not going to be CEO’s and upper management people who get their jobs replaced by AI.

    They keep trying to replace engineers, software devs and so on with AI at all the tech companies and then having to back out of that decision to keep things running.

    • matlag@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      CEOs will not be replaced any time soon, because they’re all in each other companies board and they’ll stand for each other (or more exactly from setting examples that could apply to them).