How do you like to bind your arrow keys, and why?

Ergo boards don’t typically have dedicated arrow clusters, so we’re left to bind them on some alternate layers one way or another.

Here are two prevalent layouts, along with some initial thoughts:

Homerow

Binding them linearly to a homerow on some layer.

Pros

  • Arrows directly underneath your fingertips

Cons

  • Less intuitive
  • Pinky may be weaker when going right repeatedly

Pyramid

Bind arrows in a traditional pyramid shape, likely based on a homerow as well.

Pros

  • Familiar layout
  • Extra key available for pinky, e.g. a tab might be handy

Cons

  • Finger movement required for up arrow
  • Takes space on the row above, which might matter if you’d like to have a full row of other things there

Post pic is original art by the author, public domain, commission queue is already full.

  • FlatFootFox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    I managed to quit vi once, I’m not recreating that experience again. IJKL all the way. Same hand and positions as the arrow keys, just without having to move your arm.

    • Tiuku@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’ve been using the right hand variant of this, but for no other reason than that just happening to be the case on the layout I started with. Becoming conscious of this was the reason for the making this post ^^

  • alx@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    I prefer pyramid shape, and in order to not waste space around, I generally put Home and End around the Up arrow

  • MaxMalRichtig@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    I have a split ergo and set a dedicated layer on one half as a “navigation layer”. There, I have pyramid on ESDF, skip word forward/back, start/end of line, … I placed these other movement-keys around the ESDF cluster “logically” as I don’t care to much on saving space on a dedicated layer.

    • Tiuku@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      I think it’s fairly common to have a gaming layer with wasd there already so this would indeed be a natural extension.

  • Tiuku@sopuli.xyzOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    Is anyone using the linear style for mouse emulation? I find this to be way more difficult than just moving the caret around text.

  • gid@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’m pretty used to hjkl navigation from using vim. When I first started learning vim it felt weird but it’s natural now.

  • wjrii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    The inverted T is god-damned masterpiece, regardless of where it’s placed. Your middle finger is already longer than the others and naturally rests closer to the top edge of the down arrow, requiring a minimal amount of movement to get to the up arrow. This is why it outlasted cross-nav and various godawful clusters or shift-pairs like on early 8-bit home computers, and why it never faced a serious challenge from layout-complicating diamond-nav or “does it exactly backwards” T-nav. It’s also more intuitive than 4-key linear nav, though fair play to you if your brain can make it work. I do tend to think that some folks make a commitment to staying on the home row that goes way beyond the strict needs of carpal tunnel health, but I’m a row-stagger heathen so take my thoughts for whatever they’re worth.