

peer networks are not illegal if the peers are consenting members.
peer networks are not illegal if the peers are consenting members.
Totally doable if this was a distributed service.
ok not randomly generated, but you know
nah
not even a slight chance kids today know what msn messenger is.
The older “Dog in the hunt” is a bit less grim.
Unless you’re a fox…
are you implying firefox is in a state of neglect?
hence the word “seek”
you can link external images like so

Yeah that’s fucking bullshit. Mcdonalds isn’t very cheap at all.
what? It wasn’t empty. There was, um, something about… hmm I don’t remember.
OP is a high level rouge with a CHA dump stat.
¿porque no los dos?
funny how technically the marlboros are the most natural thing of these
On the contrary. They can hide this kind of thing in the numbers. Reporting on egregious individual cases has a chance to heighten awareness.
On a positive note, that kind of claim has been struck down in Canada before.
Nah, a democratic nation has to follow its own laws. It looks much better if they revoke it with proof after due process.
did they expect any different? Why would anyone on Greenland be aligned with someone who threatened to invade you?
I went to rome once, and I found people to be super unfriendly. Like, giving me looks levels of unfriendly.
After a few hours of this I realized the problem, I was wearing a Deicide t-shirt, and rome is christian as fuck. God I’m stupid.
After a quick change people were really nice :D