Pretty wild! All states give you at least 30 days to dump your baby, no strings attached. Some states give you 60 days!

I feel like more people should know about this! It seems like a highly under utilized ability.

  • abbiistabbii@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    9 days ago

    Reasonable. Now who’s gonna bet that some dip shit in Washington makes it illegal because “mothers should face the consequences of their decisions” or some bullshit.

    Call me a cynical old bitch but when the US does something reasonable I always think “how they gonna fuck it up this time?”

      • abbiistabbii@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 days ago

        Nah, I was thinking something along the lines of the Right saying that Young mothers are abandoning their kids because “they’re selfish” or “they are avoiding responsibility” so some state passes a law that states that abandoned kids get DNA tested and traced back to their mothers so they can be forced to raise kids they can’t afford/can’t raise “to protect the family”.

        The US has a track record of fucking over women and girls, what with their war against contraception, abortion, adequate child care, etc. It wouldn’t surprise me if the next move is “stop women giving kids up for adoption” under the guise of “protecting the family” or “personal responsibility” or some shit, but in reality is just a way to create cheap labour from underpaid women with a mouth to feed.

        • guldukat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          KY is making abortion pills controlled substances, like heroin. Women must be punished apparently

    • Triasha@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Reasonable for the mother. The baby is rolling the dice.

      Healthy babies are in high demand for adoption, so the odds are good, but not perfect, and its a terrible system to get stuck in, at least in my state.

    • Carighan Maconar@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      I’m more concerned how he had ten kids and then felt overwhelmed when his wife left him. Like what the fuck?!

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 days ago

          And I’ve not met many men with 10 kids who are super into doing the whole “dividing the labor of parenting evenly” thing, and I went to catholic schools, I knew some big families. And even if he had been the type to do that, you aren’t winding up being the breadwinner for a family with 10 kids and having both low stress finances and a low stress job. So adding in lots of extra home duties and possibly reduced financial capabilities and mourning will probably wreck you.

          That said, I’ve never met a family that large where the parents kept actually parenting beyond number 3 or 4. Some of the most horrifically parentified people I ever met were middle daughters of large families. Also the kids are struggling too, and each of them is likely to have taken some lasting psychic damage from being abandoned by their dad, even temporarily, shortly after their mom died.

            • [deleted]@piefed.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 days ago

              As long as we are doing hypothetical, he may have been working long hours to pay for all the costs while she was stay at home. When she died, working all the time and trying to care for kids and grieving is going to be massively stressful. Bot to mention the aunt for 7 of the kids decided to have a custody battle so lots and lots of possible things leading to being overwhelmed.

              But you clearly assume he is a deadbeat because he’s a man. Have fun with that.

                • [deleted]@piefed.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 days ago

                  Because he didn’t do Jack raising them probably

                  Would you have assumed the same lack of parenting if the father had died and the mother dropped off the kids?

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      9 days ago

      Fire stations are everywhere, staffed by trustworthy people, who inevitably also have medical training. Additionally they aren’t scary like the police are.
      They’re the people you call if you need help.

      You can surrender an infant at a hospital too, as well as a police station, but fire stations are just more frequent.

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 days ago

      Hospitals in the US are kind of scattered, largely as a result of private equity tomfoolery. A lot of communities don’t have one nearby. But pretty much every community has at least a volunteer fire station, and I believe all firefighters are required to be trained in at least first aid, if not be fully-qualified EMTs.

    • Donebrach@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Firemen are the only honorable public emergency service left in this country. all the rest are just out to murder people (source: am an american.)

    • GarboDog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 days ago

      Fire stations are more anonymous, however you can give up rights to your child at Fire Stations, Police Stations, and Hospitals (far as we know) there are even some numbers and child protection will pick them up. Reason is because they rather take the child safely than deal with well… yk

    • KelvarCherry [They/Them]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 days ago

      Fire stations are public utilities owned by local governments. Also, hospitals are regularly visited by people, whereas fire stations are more private as they mainly send out and return from dispatches.

    • droans@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      It doesn’t have to be fire stations. But they are commonly used for a few good reasons.

      They’re relatively ubiquitous. It shouldn’t be hard for someone to locate a fire station. They’re almost always staffed 24/7. They’re trained on basic first aid. Quite often, they’ll even have medics on staff.

      Very importantly, though, they don’t have a lot of people coming in and out of them. One of the big benefits of this program is that there are zero questions asked and it’s as anonymous as you wish. The people who use these are often afraid they’ll be judged as a failure. The lockboxes have a built-in time delay so you can leave before the station is alerted.

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 days ago

    A while back I fell into the rabbit hole of people dropping off the baby without informing the other parent. turns out it’s really hard to get the kid back

    • so_pitted_wabam@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 days ago

      Omg, that is insane! Imagine coming home from work like

      “Honey, I dropped the baby off at the fire station today and the fireman yelled ‘BACK BACK NO TRADE BACK’ when I handed it over, so I’m pretty sure the decision is final. I hope you weren’t too attached to the babe.”

      • Hozerkiller@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 days ago

        “I dropped Billy off for camp at the fire station. What do you mean thats next week?”

    • ronl2k@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      9 days ago

      *US states

      Why was that clarification necessary? In what context does “all 50 states” not apply to only the US?

      • unphazed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        Because there are other countries with states, like Mexico, Brazil, and India. Do you know how many states are in each country? Neither did I, until I looked some up. Mexico has 31 states, btw, and it’s causing my brain to itch with its odd number instead of even. There are no other countries with 50 states, but I didn’t know prior and now I have useless trivia folded into my melon.

        • ronl2k@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          9 days ago

          Because there are other countries with states… There are no other countries with 50 states,

          Exactly. So, what was the point of the USA clarification?

          • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 days ago

            Because there are other countries with states, like Mexico, Brazil, and India. Do you know how many states are in each country? Neither did I, until I looked some up. Mexico has 31 states, btw, and it’s causing my brain to itch with its odd number instead of even. There are no other countries with 50 states, but I didn’t know prior and now I have useless trivia folded into my melon.

          • AxExRx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            So if an article refered to ‘in the 36 states’ would you what country theyre talking about off the top of your head?

            answer

            Nigeria is the only country with exactly 36 states

            There are plenty of complains of the web being US-centric, that i think its perfectly fair to state, and not expect everyone from every country to know how many states, just because its America.

      • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        The US is simply where the highest number of anglophones reside. You’d have to sum up the next three nations to get more English speakers than the US (according to worldatlas.com).

        Assuming an English speaker on the internet is American is still rude, but not exactly a bad guess - and hardly chauvinism imo

        • x00z@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Anglophone is an incorrect metric.

          There are more non native English speakers than native English speakers.

          On English speaking websites and communities there is no difference between those two as long as the website or community is not specifically for that purpose.

          Most people on Lemmy do not live in the US.

          • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 days ago

            Again, and I’ve tried to be very clear about this, I’m not saying they’re correct. We agree that it’s a mistake. I’m explaining how it is an easy mistake to make.

            This is a frustrating conversation.

            • AxExRx@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 days ago

              For a while, I was trying to start all my comments with things like 'to add… ’ or, ‘just to clarify…’ if I was agreeing but context pr more info or whatever

              etc since it seems like the default is to assume any response to a comment is conflict / disagreement.

              May be time to bring that back

    • so_pitted_wabam@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      It’s clear if you click the link - the article will tell you if your inference skills fail you!

    • knexcar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      Uh, the 50 states of our country? Surely you learned about them in elementary school.

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 days ago

    Yeah this directly came out of people abandoning babies in all sorts of place. Some places have these nest type of boxes all padded and temperature controlled where people can leave babies. This is the type of good thing I could see today republicans rallying to stop.

  • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 days ago

    Most fire stations in the US have at least one person trained as a paramedic/EMT and in many places all of them have at least some medical training. Because in a lot of places fire trucks arrive, there’s people who need immediate medical help.

    So they have the basic skills to keep a newborn baby alive until they can get it to a hospital. And if it’s older and healthy, they can just play with it and feed it and clean it as needed until Child Services arrives or it grows up and joins the crew.

    • blueworld@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Baby hatches in the United States are generally called “newborn safety devices” or “newborn safety incubators.” The first known installation of baby hatches in the United States was in Arizona in approximately 2001. Known as “drawers,” the devices were installed primarily in Maricopa County, where six drawers exist at local hospitals as of May 2023. Beginning in 2016, the Indiana-based nonprofit corporation Safe Haven Baby Boxes began installing its own branded “Safe Haven Baby Boxes” in locations throughout Indiana, the first in 2016. As of April 2023, there were 153 baby hatches installed and in use in eleven states, primarily Indiana, which has nearly 100 hatches in operation. Other states with baby hatches include Ohio, Arkansas, New Mexico, Kentucky, and Florida. As of May 2023, eight additional states have enacted laws authorizing installation of baby hatches, though none have been installed.

      This article is just wow!

  • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    Yeah, but when I drop a teenager off at the fire station, they just bring her back home and tell me I can’t do that because it’s considered “child abandonment.”

  • robocall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    I thought you had to fill out a form or identify yourself or they’d do DNA on the baby to identify you. But this says parents can remain nameless. I’m not sure what that entails.

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      Literally no questions asked. A lot of fire stations even have special temperature-controlled compartments with alarms connected so that people can drop their baby off without even being seen.

    • so_pitted_wabam@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Yeah from what I understand you can pull up, say the magic words, give no documentation of any type, then leave without the baby

      • WraithGear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        this is important to prevent the issue of mothers leaving their babies in the dumpster instead. it’s sad they grow up an orphan, but better then the alternative by a mile.

      • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        That seems like it would open up a whole can of worms when, a decade later, your kid should be starting school. They ask you where he is and you have no documentation of what happened to him. Don’t they start asking serious legal questions about your “missing” kid, and accusing you of foul play?