• Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 month ago

    The DC-3 was designed in the late thirties, and is still in commercial service to this day. They’re even getting rebuilt and converted to turboprop power.

  • menas@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    I was shocked during the 2nd Irak war to learn that the “surgical strike” the media were talking about was made by B52. This plane was made when carpet bombing was a need to hit a target; now it’s a weapon of terror

  • OwOarchist@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    It’s just a flying dump truck that dumps loads of bombs onto enemies. What more could you want? You want one that’s fast, that’s what the B-1 is for. You want one that’s stealthy, that’s what the B-2 is for. You want one that’s small and agile, you just strap some bombs to a fighter jet.

    But if you want a cost-effective way to deliver bulk munitions to someone whose day is about to be ruined, the B-52 is your plane.

    The only reason I could think that it would be replaced anytime soon is to perhaps replace it with a fully autonomous mega-drone of a bomber … and even then, the best, most cost-effective option is probably just to replace the B-52’s cockpit with sensors and a computer.

  • rem26_art@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    If we do ever build a fleet of spaceships for war, You know the B-52 will be there. They’ll design a whole space plane, build like 3, then decide, “eh, the B-52 can handle this”