A U.S. intelligence assessment completed shortly before the United States and Israel launched a war in Iran had determined that American military intervention was not likely to lead to regime change in the Islamic Republic, according to two people familiar with the finding.

The National Intelligence Council’s assessment in February concluded that neither limited airstrikes nor a larger, prolonged military campaign would be likely to result in a new government taking over in Iran, even if the current leadership was killed, according to the two people, who spoke on condition of anonymity to describe the classified report.

The determination undercuts the administration’s assertion that it can complete its objectives in Iran relatively quickly, perhaps in a matter of weeks. The administration has asserted that it was not seeking regime change in Iran, even as the strikes have taken out many figures in the Iranian leadership and President Donald Trump considers whom he would like to see lead the country.

  • zd9@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Krasnov trusts the GRU and the FSB over his own CIA and ODNI. Of course this doesn’t matter.

  • TachyonTele@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Why do the press think they wanted regime change? It’s iran. It’s their dream just to blow the place up.

  • ultranaut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    11 hours ago

    It is kind of funny that Iran already replaced Khomeini with another Khomeini. Except this one is extra shitty, and now also extra pissed off too.

  • kboos1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Trump’s code name should be Blunt Knife because he’s about as useful as one.

    • biofaust@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The one you could use where I am from is “one hand clap”

      Just as effective as clapping with one hand.

    • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 hours ago

      We call people like that “bull tits”.

      “That boy’s about as useful as tits on a bull.”

  • homes@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    They changed leadership. It’s basically the same guy, just his son. The exact same flavor of religious crazy, just younger.

    This analysis is useless

    • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      That’s not what “change in leadership” means; it means different governments with different agendas coming into power. That will not happen as a result of this war.

      • njm1314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        That is however exactly what Donald Trump said leadership change in Venezuela meant.

        • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Very different situations. Maduro was dictator of a relatively smaller nation that would not be the same without him there, while Iran is larger, more powerful, and has a leadership structure less dependent on one person. Even then, kidnapping Maduro does not mean his more pro US replacement is a reliable ally. She could be overthrown and is limited in how much she can help them.

            • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              He understands: Maduro weak, Iran not quite as weak. He just goes along with Israel’s plans because he appreciates how they kill brown people. Maduro was deposed because Venezuela was an easy target to show strength against. It accomplished nothing for the US just like the current war, but Trump never gave a shit about US interests.

      • homes@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Just because you have your own special definition of the phrase doesn’t mean that “a change in leadership“ means the same for everyone else.

        A different person is now in leadership of Iran. That is a change of leadership,

        Stop being weird about this

        Edit: sorry not sorry that facts piss you off. Deal with it, assholes.

        • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Says the person who misses the bigger picture. The US and Israel don’t want to national build, they just want Iran’s military to be weaker. They know that installing a long lasting puppet would be next to impossible, so they instead want to disarm their enemy.

            • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Words mean whatever society agrees they mean. Sometimes the subtext is more important than the literal definition.

              Ad hominem attacks don’t help your case.

  • xxce2AAb@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 hours ago

    But of course Trump and his Merry Men knew better than the unmatched intelligence and military apparatus they have around to call upon.