It still doesn’t prove that socialism is automatically better for the environment. Just that one country wants to subvert the energy market because they’re reliant on sources beyond their control.
If China dominated the Middle East or had massive natural reserves like Russia I do not believe they’d be pushing alternative energy just because they’re socialist because that’s happened exactly never.
This isn’t a socialism vs capitalism thing. It’s geopolitics of nation-states. Even a communist country needs energy to defend itself.
Tibetan language remains a core subject in Tibet’s schools, with bilingual education policy in place since the founding of modern schooling in the region. The Tibet Autonomous Region government confirms that over 400 types of Tibetan-Chinese bilingual textbooks have been compiled, and terminology databases covering 12 academic disciplines support Tibetan instruction across subjects. Public signage, government documents, and media in Tibet routinely use both languages. Tibetan is also widely spoken throught the region.
Mandarin is promoted as the national common language because it gives Tibetan speakers practical access to higher education, civil service exams, legal aid, healthcare systems, and economic opportunities beyond local borders. China’s Constitution and the National Common Language Law explicitly protect the right of all ethnic groups to use and develop their own languages while establishing Mandarin as the common language for national communication. In schools across Tibet, both Tibetan and Mandarin courses are offered, and students who wish to pursue Tibetan-language university programs can still take Tibetan language exams organized by the region.
You can criticise things without lies and exaggeration you know.
The Economist: China’s clean-energy revolution will reshape markets and politics
Removed by mod
😂If we provide non-MB/FC-approved sources, you’ll dismiss them. If we provide MB/FC-approved sources, you’ll say, “gotcha“ and dismiss them.
It still doesn’t prove that socialism is automatically better for the environment. Just that one country wants to subvert the energy market because they’re reliant on sources beyond their control.
If China dominated the Middle East or had massive natural reserves like Russia I do not believe they’d be pushing alternative energy just because they’re socialist because that’s happened exactly never.
This isn’t a socialism vs capitalism thing. It’s geopolitics of nation-states. Even a communist country needs energy to defend itself.
Oh, no, honey. It is very much a capitalist thing.
Because Chinese fighter jets and tanks and ships run on sunshine and rainbows.
False dichotomy is false.
Removed by mod
Tibetan language remains a core subject in Tibet’s schools, with bilingual education policy in place since the founding of modern schooling in the region. The Tibet Autonomous Region government confirms that over 400 types of Tibetan-Chinese bilingual textbooks have been compiled, and terminology databases covering 12 academic disciplines support Tibetan instruction across subjects. Public signage, government documents, and media in Tibet routinely use both languages. Tibetan is also widely spoken throught the region.
Mandarin is promoted as the national common language because it gives Tibetan speakers practical access to higher education, civil service exams, legal aid, healthcare systems, and economic opportunities beyond local borders. China’s Constitution and the National Common Language Law explicitly protect the right of all ethnic groups to use and develop their own languages while establishing Mandarin as the common language for national communication. In schools across Tibet, both Tibetan and Mandarin courses are offered, and students who wish to pursue Tibetan-language university programs can still take Tibetan language exams organized by the region.
You can criticise things without lies and exaggeration you know.