• stinerman@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Not trying to be that guy, but ActivityPub is technically owned by the W3C. I agree with the sentiment of your post regarding the free nature of AP.

        • stinerman@feddit.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          AP is just a protocol. Like HTTP. The IETF owns the HTTP protocol. Anyone is free to implement it, but they decide what HTTP is and how it evolves over time.

          • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            I don’t believe many people implementing AP listen to W3C. W3C can say they own it, but I want to see practical evidence, not just a flag.

            • stinerman@feddit.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              By that definition no one owns any open standard. Either way this was an academic argument to start with, so it’s not worth belaboring.

      • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        The specification yes. But can they silence voices they don’t like, and amplify those they do? No? Then no problem.

    • Owl@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      Seems like there are an awful lot of tankies here though

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Sure but watch this

        Tankies suck! Stalin was a monster. China is an undemocratic oligarchy. Luigi Mangione should go shoot Kim Jong Un.

        See? That’s why the fediverse is better.

        • Owl@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yes that’s cool! But if we were in a community ruled by people who were to disagree with what you wrote you would be banned and censored the same. And some communities are too large and well in place for their userbase to be moved.

          • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 month ago

            If not tankies, then who rules this community? I’ll put it to the test. My guess is that they’ll only ban me if I say something truly horrible, not merely “people who disagree”.

            Enshittification is all about next quarter, not reliable income. Eventually it gets so shitty that the users move.

        • jdr@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          You’re lucky you’re not in the wrong instance!

    • freagle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Y’all, who do you think owned the news media before this latest batch of billionaires owned it? Who do you think it owner it before them?

      Hint: the rich have owned the news media in Western countries since before the fucking Opium Wars. It’s been this way since China was a peasant country and Russia was a Tsarist feudal society.

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    I dunno Bernie. The use of the word oligarchy makes me “feel a little queasy.” But I guess I agree with you.

    • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Oracle probably doesn’t mean anything to the typical person so Bernie didn’t mention it, but Oracle owns a ton of shit which would have made ole Evil Larry an oligarch even before all these media company takeovers.

      • Leon@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Name would be fitting. They’re a law firm pretending to be a software company.

        • freagle@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          They’re a CIA operation pretending to be a software company that is actually a law firm

  • elbiter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    Of course it is. And is also about oligarchs giving orders to the media they control to not call them by that name.

  • Tempus Fugit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yes, now realize every establishment Democrat is also paid off by these demons too. Grassroots progressives or RIP the system, I have no other choice.

    • Leon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      If you’re playing a game by the rules your opponent not only writes, but also actively breaks, and cheats, you’re going to lose.

  • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s been a problem ever since the Industrial Revolution, which oligarchs supplanted the aristocracy while class conflict remained. There were attempts at changing the status quo, or overthrowing it and replacing with a different system, there’s so much discussion and debate, but actual success of the masses – if we must have inclusion of those oppressed regardless of race, creed or faith – has yet to be seen.

    One thing is for certain: this time peaceful and legal options are starting to be exhausted of their energy, as the moneyed enemy isn’t going to yield easily.

  • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    Average American: “That won’t stop me because I can’t read! [Trump approval rating continues going lower].”

    • Renat@szmer.info
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      If one ship cost is one bilion dollars(Elon once bought a yacht for one bilion dollars) he could fund all ships for Achaemenid Empire for Battle of Salamis.

  • Zorque@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 month ago

    More an example of plutocracy, but definitely an example of both.

    Unless he’s specifically talking about corporate holdings, then it’s oligopoly, not oligarchy.