• debil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Been on Awesome WM since '08, but once dappled with KDE. Does it still have resource hungry processes that I have no use for (IIRC, Akonadi or daemons related to it were one of those problematic components)?

  • smeg@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    I just want a conventional desktop paradigm that feels relatively integrated. For almost a decade I used Cinnamon until I found myself really wanting Wayland. For the past 5 years or so, I have used GNOME. It’s clean, and with a few tweaks it meets my needs.

  • rozodru@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    since Plasma 6.5 I just daily drive it now. prior to that I was all about WM’s be it Herbstluftwm, Sway, Niri, whatever but after awhile I just got tired of configuring them or dealing with quirks about each one and what have you. Plasma just does everything I need and I don’t have to think about it. And you can even get it to tile now be it manual or dynamic. Plus you can theme the hell out of it. It just works. Plus Konsole has become my favourite terminal. just don’t see a point in using other stuff anymore.

  • Bluewing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ve enjoyed KDE since Mandrake 6. The control you get to have as a user is amazing. Thought to be honest, I really change very little. But the Cube! I will die for that Cube.

    But I have used probably every DE that runs on Linux one time or another. Each has its own charms and quirks. While my laptop lives comfortably with Fedora 43 Kinonite, the cheap mini desktop I’m using right now currently has COSMIC on it. And to be honest, as much as I like LXDE, dnfdragoria as it’s package manager, someone at Fedora needs to take dnfdragoria out back and launch it into the sun. COMIC is far lighter feeling than I thought would be. I will live with it for a while I think.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s a shame about the licensing issues Qt had back in the day, because otherwise there was no reason GTK (and therefore GNOME) ever needed to exist.

        • rajano@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          I know this is a joke, but before I discovered GNU-Linux I used XP and didn’t hate it. I was usable. Microsoft hadn’t yet completely stripped away user autonomy.

            • rajano@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              The next laptop I bought came preinstalled with Windows Vista (AKA Windows Millenium version 2). It was so frustrating I decided to investigate alternatives. I even considered going Macintosh. But I was at a bookstore and saw one of those Linux magazines with a free disc from which I could install Linux. I think it was Ubuntu on the disc (before Unity). I was hooked. I use Trisquel now.

              • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                I mean, everyone liked XP and most everyone tried to keep using it years after Microsoft wanted us to stop. Everyone hated vista.

                But modern gnome is excellent. My joke was trying to point out that hating it while liking the old version seems like a uniquely old man thing to do, just hating change for being change

                • rajano@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Gnome 3 got rid of desktop icons and the menu of Gnome 2, it was also a resource hog. Mate offers what I liked about Gnome 2. Sue me.

                • orlyowl@piefed.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  while liking the old version seems like a uniquely old man thing to do, just hating change for being change

                  Gnome 3 was a huge paradigm shift. Most people who noped out of Gnome afterwards disliked very specific things about it, not just hating change for being change. This is a really dismissive and kind of insulting take.

                • bryndos@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  TIL I am not a one. I never chose XP; I didn’t ever install that cartoonish bloatfest over win2k on my home pc.

                  https://web.archive.org/web/20110523235652im_/http://www.vorck.com/windows/graphics/dogkill.gif

  • Ghostie@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ve used GNOME and I’ve used KDE. Don’t have a problem with GNOME but KDE is just how I like my desktop experience to act. I am intrigued about Cosmic though.

    • Bluewing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I just install the Fedora spin of COSMIC. So far, I have to say that I’m impressed by it. It’s pretty lightweight and nimble on low-end hardware while still having just enough customizing to be satisfying. The DE is also pretty easy and simple to use. It also appears to be very stable and tolerant during use.

      If you got time, I would tell you to just try it. It has quickly gone from “I’m not very sure about this choice.” to “Hey, I kinda like this.”

    • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      KDE and GNOME each have their shortcomings. KDE has never been completely stable for me but it’s so much better than it used to be. GNOME is the best at what it’s good at and the worst at everything else. There’s no grey area with gnome.

      Cosmic looks super promising. I need to play with it.

  • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I’m still stuck on i3 and sway. I hear there’s a version of KDE that is tiling…? But I haven’t found anything definitive on that.

      • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        I’ve heard this which made me assume it was like an option I can just enable, but every search has only come up with some baroque scripting or configuration guides, which seems like a lot more work than just using an actual tiling window manager.

        E: Oh I get it now, you just install Krohnkite. This is a bit of an improvement, I will admit.

    • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      still stuck on i3 and sway

      That’s an odd statement. I’d place i3 and Sway deeper down the rabbit hole, being build-your-own[1] as opposed to packaged deals like KDE.


      1. in the sense of building a configuration - not in the sense of compiling code. ↩︎

      • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I’d place i3 and Sway deeper down the rabbit hole …

        I mean they are, but my mind and fingers have been so twisted by vim that I can’t really interact with floating wms without feeling honestly pretty intense discomfort. I see people having fun with their cool Plasmas etc and I wish I could make the leap, but every time I try I just bristle at all the mouse use. The lack of control makes me feel like I’m trying to use a computer while wearing oven mittens.