Case was seen as major test of the first amendment and whether the US could use broad anti-terrorism statute to prosecute leftwing protesters
Case was seen as major test of the first amendment and whether the US could use broad anti-terrorism statute to prosecute leftwing protesters
There shouldn’t be a law against terrorism. Real terrorism already involves serious crimes (murder etc.). There should not be a law defining “being a terrorist” as illegal.
“found guilty of support for terrorism” is bullshit.
If the bill of rights is not applicable, they are beyond laws.
The rules are made up and the points don’t matter.
Do you think they classified the IRGC as a terrorist organization so that they can have a pretense for going after critics of the war?