• imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    The left lane is for passing. If you’re not passing somebody, move over to the right lane. It’s not that hard people

    • Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      For people who don’t know, the theory of chiropractics is that the light of God somehow shines into the human body through the top of the head, travels down the spine, and on through the nerves. If you can just fix any blockages (aka “subluxations”) in that flow then it will be impossible for disease to exist in the body. Because God’s light.

      The founder of chiropractics was told this information by a ghost.

      I know some people swear by chiropractic adjustments, but this is information I wish I’d known when I had my back injury because going to a chiropractor set my recovery back by at least three years. And the money I lost to that quack could have paid for not only the legit physical therapist that actually got me feeling better, but probably a decent massage chair too.

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    That you need to wash your hands after going to the bathroom. I’ve seen too many grown men walk straight out of the restroom after urinating.

    • Chaos0f7ife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I feel so nasty if I don’t wash my hands after using the bathroom.

      I’m not a germaphobe, but I refuse to touch bathroom handles. I will grab a paper towel and use it to turn on and off the faucet and open the bathroom door.

  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    If the point of getting a job is so that you can eventually retire one day, and you know what you want to do when you retire, you should start doing what you want to do now while you can enjoy it.

    Similarly, If you feel like the place you were born in makes you unhappy, move to a different place. There are so many places.

    • Fondots@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      The problem is that the one thing I want to do that I’m not already doing is “not work”

      I don’t have any grand plans to take up new hobbies or anything in my retirement (though I’m sure I’ll continue collecting hobbies just as I always have) I just want to be able to do them on my own schedule

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        That was my focus too, finding a way to have more time to myself on my own terms.

        I usually suggest teaching English abroad if you’re a native speaker.

        You could chant primary colors at kindergarteners online line for a maximum of 20 hours per week, or in person for a maximum of 10 hours per week and clear $400 easy.

        You could also teach 20 hours a week for 6 months and then live off the savings for years.

        That’s minimum wage 400 bucks a week, we’ll say you spent $400 for monthly expenses wherever you are, tje other 3 weeks are all your necessary expenses for 3 months without working, or one month partying.

        Want to boost your pay? Take an internationally accredited tefl course online for a couple days, pdf tests, that costs 40 bucks and you’ll instantly be paid more than the minimum wage($20 an hour’s the usual minimum) they pay teachers at any job you apply for.

        If having your own time is really the most important thing to you, as it is to me, the process is very simple, especially for native English speakers.

        You don’t need to do it the rest of your life either.

        Work part-time for a few months and then take a year off to figure out If you’re doing what you want to be doing. At least you won’t be wasting time and money figuring it out.

        Do you want to keep vacationing? Then you have already done it and have experience with that.

        The next year you vacation it’ll be even cheaper and easier than it was the first time.

        Do you want to pursue a hobby professionally? You have time to set that up. Or you can pursue the hobby for fun, indefinitely.

        • Fondots@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          You could chant primary colors at kindergarteners online line for a maximum of 20 hours per week, or in person for a maximum of 10 hours per week

          That may work for you, and if it does I’m happy for you, but for me, as much as I want more time for myself and my hobbies, one thing I want even more is to not ever spend any amount of time doing anything even remotely like that.

          I also have no real interest in working abroad even if I didn’t think that job sounded horrible. A week or two of vacation, sure, but by the end of week 2, I’m ready to go home, and that’s really the point here, I want to be able to just stay home, and only leave when it’s to do something I want to do.

          • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            So youre sure you don’t like the situation you’re in, but equally sure you don’t want to leave that situation.

            You have a lot of company.

            Teaching is not the only option, and no, that’s not what I do.

            It doesn’t sound like you’re really looking for solutions yet.

  • BezzelBob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    That the “give heroine to pregnant women and cigs to kids” era of the 18-1900s is the same as the “artificial food additives and lab grown meat” of today

      • BezzelBob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Most notably the fact that it grows so quickly by utilizing cancer cells, also that this is the exact same scenario as the cigarette epidemic, no one knows what exactly are the side effects since this has never been done before. Also it’s ironic how most people stay away from preservatives and artificial chemicals because “theyre bad” but will happily down man’s attempt at playing god

        • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          What’s the actual difference between a cancer cell and a normal cell, aside from the fact that cancer cells don’t kill themselves? Is cancer from a cow transmissible to humans?

          People knew the effects of tobacco for centuries, actually. But also, it became widely known as soon as it started being widely investigated. I have the same argument about vapes all the time. Within like 2 years cigarettes went from being something prescribed by doctors to something that everyone knows gives you cancer. When something is as heavily scrutinized as vapes or lab-grown meat, you can be damned sure the effects will be widely understood within a couple of decades

          • BezzelBob@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            What’s the actual difference between a cancer cell and a normal cell, aside from the fact that cancer cells don’t kill themselves

            You answered your own question

            Is cancer from a cow transmissible to humans?

            Who knows? What’s the whole point. Were playing god without knowing the consequences.

            People knew the effects of tobacco for centuries, actually

            Wrong. Doctors lied about it for years when it first came out and long after

            Within like 2 years cigarettes went from being something prescribed by doctors to something that everyone knows gives you cancer.

            Again, wrong. Early warning signs didn’t show up until the late 50s by then it had been 20-30 years to late. And Dr. Luther Terry didn’t come in for another 14 after that in '64. Even despite this evidence, the tobacco industry went to massive lengths to discredit the research and downplay the health risks by funding biased research, launched propaganda campaigns, and used public relations strategies to create doubt. It wasn’t until '98 that the Master Settlement Agreement came into effect. A whole 68 years before they paid for their crimes.

            When something is as heavily scrutinized as vapes or lab-grown meat, you can be damned sure the effects will be widely understood within a couple of decades

            Decades? You mean the 7+ decades it took for tobacco? After which everyone had died already? Idk about you but I’m not waiting 10-20-30+ years to find out if I get a new disease named after me.

            The fact is people who advocate for this shit don’t understand science and just believe what their told to, just like what everyone believed when big tobacco ran those propaganda campaigns for 70 years, or what some still believe about global warming from big oil’s propaganda campaigns.

            Just because we don’t know something today doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist, humans arent as smart as we give ourselfs credit. And just be we did it in the past, doesn’t mean we’ve learned from those mistakes because clearly you all are still buying the shit they feed you and begging for more.

              • BezzelBob@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                Wow, Ignoring quite literally the entire commet and using a “nuh huh” argument. Classic bootleg reddit user tactic

                • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  I’m ignoring it because you don’t really have anything to say besides “we don’t know what the health effects of lab grown meat will be” when it’s quite literally exactly the same as normal meat. It’s like complaints about GMOs. The process of producing it may be different, but the physical material that you consume is literally identical on a chemical level. It’s nothing like cigarettes.

  • Mango@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Genders aren’t real. Stop bothering me with how you think people should act regarding their ugly bits. I don’t need to know about your sex life and how proud you are for the way you get your happy sensors wiggled.

      • Mango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        It shouldn’t be. If gender roles are bad, and it’s not about genitals, what the fuck else is left for the words? There’s no physical or metaphysical meaning to apply.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          I know it shouldn’t be, I’m just mentioning that it’s controversial because there’s some pretty obvious stuff that people mentioned as a reply to the original question.

  • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    All rich people became rich because people like you and me are paying more for services and things than they’re truly worth, which means we pretty much never get our money’s worth even when we feel like we do.

    There are no good rich people.

    • Omodi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Most rich people became rich because their ancestors got paid a surplus.

  • duffman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    The pursuit of “equity” is a tribalistic and often racist effort that rebuilds and reinforces the systemic racism we’ve been trying to dismantle for decades.

    • jh29a@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      The “equity” from "Private Equity (has consumed America by Sam “Wendover Productions”)? or which one? If you mean equality (also known as equity): do you mean how insisting on equality of e.g. external conditions (taxes, school curricula, etc.) is ableist or something?

      • duffman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Equality and equity are different, as it has been defined by various movements in the US. This definition has been adopted in mainstream usage for a while now. I’m surprised by your question, I feel this would be common knowledge to most people in western societies by this point. But I’m happy to answer if you are asking in good faith.

        Equality is sort of the color-blind approach to treating people equally, with little to no regard for their race. It looks at their individual circumstances, not making broad assumptions based on their racial background. For the record, color blind doesn’t mean we dont seek to identify and correct racial issues, it just means we typically do so without creating race specific policies and instead apply the policies to everyone. My deep appreciation of equality as a fundamental principal is why I oppose equity and the strategic equivocation with which it is used.

        Equity is contrasted to that by putting race front and center, and often above all else when making decisions on resource allocation. It’s how we get policies that broadly focus on racial groups. It’s not always advertised but equity is opposed to equality, so that specific races can be selected to receive benefits, or excluded from receiving benefits.

        Speaking to the movement more broadly, In order to justify equity, anything that can be measured through the lens of race will be(deconstruction) and any difference in outcome will be flagged as racism, but only if white people are on the advantagous side.

        Why is this bad? Don’t POCs need help?

        They often do, but our racial based policies to correct them are often counterproductive, discriminatory, or even harmful. Our need based programs already disproportionately benefit them, and will continue to do so more if we bolster them. Here’s some quick examples of equitable efforts, just to give you an idea of how it manifests. These are extremely condensed, but I could pull links later if you want them.

        • Misguided attempt to remove sat scores from college admissions because of claims it’s inequitable.
        • Despite overwhelming evidence that helmets save lives, helmet laws were cut because some demographics didn’t wear them as often.
        • College students giving free covid masks to minorities but saying white people must pay.
        • There was an attempt to create a math framework that attempts to deconstruct mathematics into a racist construct.
        • When a professor did a comprehensive study of police violence and found no disparity in some aspects of policing, he was advised not to publish the results.