• ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    2 months ago

    Reading Marx is like reading Adam Smith. Both wrote about economic systems before economics was even a thing. All ideas start somewhere but our ideas, and our society, have advanced dramatically in the 140+ years they’ve been dead. They’re more interesting for historical purposes than economic ones.

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      All of Marx’s main concepts, surplus value, classes and class struggle, alienation, are just as relevant today as when they were written. Much like Newton, Marx built the solid foundation that scientific socialists stand on today.

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Das Kapital described crypto before digital computers were even an idea. His work is still relevant.

      • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I thought to look this up cause I think it’s neat and it’s often the case that some technology is described long before you’d think. The first description of using electrical switches to do logic operations came in 1886 in a letter from Charles Sanders Peirce. That’s between Capital volume 2 and 3, and most importantly, AFTER he described the law of value.

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Both wrote about economic systems before economics was even a thing.

      Lol. Lmao, even.

      and our society, have advanced dramatically in the 140+ years they’ve been dead.

      In what manner has this proven Marx wrong?